Website review, no card needed

bluecurrent.nl logo

bluecurrent.nl website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202637 issues · 76 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on bluecurrent.nl, 15 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.5 s1.2 sMay 2Oct 171.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.3 s
May 9, 20261.2 s
May 16, 20261.3 s
May 23, 20261.3 s
May 30, 20261.2 s
Jun 6, 20261.2 s
Jun 13, 20261.2 s
Jun 20, 20261.2 s
Jun 27, 20261.2 s
Jul 4, 20261.2 s
Jul 11, 20261.3 s
Jul 18, 20261.3 s
Jul 25, 20261.3 s
Aug 1, 20261.4 s
Aug 8, 20261.4 s
Aug 15, 20261.3 s
Aug 22, 20261.4 s
Aug 29, 20261.4 s
Sep 5, 20261.3 s
Sep 12, 20261.3 s
Sep 19, 20261.2 s
Sep 26, 20261.2 s
Oct 3, 20261.3 s
Oct 10, 20261.4 s
Oct 17, 20261.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
123 ms91 msMay 2Oct 17100 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026111 ms
May 9, 2026105 ms
May 16, 202697 ms
May 23, 202697 ms
May 30, 202697 ms
Jun 6, 202697 ms
Jun 13, 202698 ms
Jun 20, 202698 ms
Jun 27, 202696 ms
Jul 4, 202697 ms
Jul 11, 202695 ms
Jul 18, 202699 ms
Jul 25, 2026103 ms
Aug 1, 2026106 ms
Aug 8, 2026104 ms
Aug 15, 2026105 ms
Aug 22, 2026115 ms
Aug 29, 2026119 ms
Sep 5, 2026116 ms
Sep 12, 2026104 ms
Sep 19, 2026102 ms
Sep 26, 2026100 ms
Oct 3, 2026103 ms
Oct 10, 2026103 ms
Oct 17, 2026100 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of bluecurrent.nl (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. bluecurrent.nl at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. bluecurrent.nl at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. bluecurrent.nl at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. bluecurrent.nl at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. bluecurrent.nl at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. bluecurrent.nl at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. bluecurrent.nl at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. bluecurrent.nl at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

9 to fix42
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.3 s · 712 KiB

    About 712 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.4 s

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 2.4 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 42

    42/100

    Your mobile performance score is 42 (desktop: 50). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.2 MB

    3 images could be 1.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, sanity.io and axept.io), adding 3.2 MB and 734 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 730 ms

    730 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 730 ms of main-thread work and 884 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 12 long tasks on the main thread

    12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 271 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 2.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • sanity.io adds 4 ms

    4 ms

    sanity.io costs a phone 4 ms of main-thread work and 2.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    14 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 14 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 12.6 s

    12.6 s

    Your largest element takes 12.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Innovatieve laadpunten en dynamische energieoplossingen die…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 14.7 s

    14.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 14.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 762 ms

    762 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 762 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.19

    0.19

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.19 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Speed Index: 5.0 s

    5.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.173

    0.173

    The layout shifts by 0.173 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 111 ms to 100 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 98 ms

    98 ms

    Real visitors wait 98 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.6 s

    0.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 348 ms

    348 ms

    Real visitors wait 348 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix33
  • Page weight: 4.2 MB in 103 requests

    4.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.2 MB in 103 requests on a phone: images 2.3 MB (26), scripts 1.5 MB (28) and fonts 300 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.19 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.19 g of CO₂e: 142.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 7687
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 8 text elements with low contrast

    8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (6 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)

    Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

1 checks passed
  • 37 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 10085
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.bluecurrent.nl/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • Only 3 internal links

    The homepage links to only 3 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 83 characters

    Your meta description is 83 characters: “Innovative charge points for any situation where sustainable mobility plays a role.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Smart charging and energy solutions!”.

  • Title: 52 characters

    Your title is a healthy 52 characters: “Blue Current - Together towards a sustainable future”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

2 to fix63
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    25%

    A phone browser shows 594 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 150. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

100
  • 1 page with very little text

    /legal has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 1 internal page checked

    We fetched 1 page linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 1 page we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 1 page that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 1 page that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Error: <svg> attribute width: Expected length, "auto".”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    6 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix60
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 594 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 594 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Know more or get a quote”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 8 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at bluecurrent.nl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Vercel

Hiring

Hiring
18 open roles
Teams
Advanced Manufacturing (4), Tech Operations Team (3), Cell Engineering Team (2), R&D (2)
Job board
greenhouse

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on bluecurrent.nl, including 17 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25