Website review, no card needed
bricklink.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202653 issues · 118 checks
This review found 53 issues worth fixing on bricklink.com, 22 of them high impact, across 118 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
69DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 994 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 992 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 994 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 999 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 104 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 104 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 102 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 102 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 101 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 97 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.9 s
1.7 s
2.6 s
3.4 s
4.3 s
5.1 s
6.0 s
6.9 s
bricklink.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Improve image delivery
14.4 s · 2.7 MB31 images could be 2.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 14.4 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
12.6 s · 2.3 MB42 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.3 MB).
Render-blocking requests
10.3 s12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 10.3 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.1 s · 332 KiBAbout 332 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 21
21/100Your mobile performance score is 21 (desktop: 60). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Reduce unused CSS
620 ms · 119 KiBAbout 119 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 620 ms faster on a phone.
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 404 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
310 ms · 14 KiB14 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
awswaf.com adds 281 ms
281 msawswaf.com costs a phone 281 ms of main-thread work and 317 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.3 s
A phone's processor spends 2.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (awswaf.com and lego.com), adding 490 KiB and 281 ms of main-thread time.
Font display
200 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 200 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
100 ms · 17 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 17 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 60 but mobile only 21. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 21 ms
21 msYour server sent the HTML in 21 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.43
0.43For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.43 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 10.5 s
10.5 sThe first text or image appears after 10.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 33.7 s
33.7 sYour largest element takes 33.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “BrickLink® Designer Program Series 9. Last chance, pre-orde…”.
Time to Interactive: 33.8 s
33.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 33.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.5 s
10.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.438
0.438The layout shifts by 0.438 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 610 ms
610 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 610 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
23 images without width and height
23 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 104 ms to 97 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.1 s to 1.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 117 ms
117 msReal visitors wait 117 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.1 MB in 111 requests
6.1 MBYour homepage downloads 6.1 MB in 111 requests on a phone: images 4.1 MB (67), fonts 1.1 MB (7) and scripts 775 KiB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
9 images in older formats
9 images (901 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (31 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit
1.74 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.74 g of CO₂e: 208.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (2 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
36 text elements with low contrast
36 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
13 tap targets too small
13 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (2 elements)
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
8 images without alt text
8 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (21 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 21 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
38 links without text
38 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h5, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
39 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 13 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“New tool: Split & Merge” and “Check your design with Color Validator”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
Meta description is long (189 characters)
Your meta description is 189 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.bricklink.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
20 internal links, 0 external
The homepage links to 20 pages on bricklink.com and 0 external pages.
2 checks passed
Title: 57 characters
Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “BrickLink - Buy and sell LEGO Parts, Sets and Minifigures”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
Some text only appears after JavaScript runs
41%The HTML your server sends has 226 of the 548 words a browser shows. AI crawlers don't run JavaScript, so they miss the rest.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 1 crawler
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Other pages
2 pages without a title
/catalogList.asp and /messageList.asp have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
4 pages without a meta description
/catalogList.asp, /v3/studio/gallery.page, /v3/studio/download.page and /messageList.asp have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
5 pages share a meta description
/catalog.asp, /v2/community/newsview.page, /catalogTree.asp, /browse.asp and /help.asp use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
9 pages without an H1
/catalog.asp, /v2/community/newsview.page, /catalogList.asp, /catalogTree.asp, /v3/studio/gallery.page and /v3/studio/download.page and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
5 pages with very little text
/v2/community/newsview.page, /catalogTree.asp, /v3/studio/gallery.page, /v3/studio/download.page and /help.asp have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
9 internal pages checked
We fetched 9 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 9 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Best practices
51 small tap targets
51 of 128 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://static.bricklink.com/vendor/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.css' from origin 'https…”.
4 low-resolution images
4 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
3 redirects before the homepage
Opening https://bricklink.com goes through 3 redirects before the homepage loads.
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.bricklink.com/v2/community/newsview.page?msgid=1239834.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
8 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (bricklink.com).
Valid certificate (161 days left)
The certificate from Amazon · Amazon RSA 2048 M01 verifies for bricklink.com and is valid for another 161 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://bricklink.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 13 links work
All 13 links checked from your homepage (13 internal, 0 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
bricklink.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
bricklink.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 24 years old
24 yearsbricklink.com was registered in Jan 2002 through CSC Corporate Domains, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Jan 2027
bricklink.com is registered until Jan 2027.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 548 words of copy
The homepage carries about 548 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more” and “Shop in stores”.
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Join”, “Learn more” and “Shop in stores”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Matomo.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 100/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com ip4:54.209.67.9 ip4:18.210.58.96 ip4:3.213.113.25 ip4:54.208.31.131 ip4:54.82…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “k2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
21 cookies set on arrival
21Opening the homepage sets 21 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
3 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2015.
Stack
- Analytics
- Matomo
Company
- Founded
- 2000
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 53 issues on bricklink.com, including 21 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.