Website review, no card needed
bronners.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202652 issues · 112 checks
This review found 52 issues worth fixing on bronners.com, 20 of them high impact, across 112 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
63DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 155 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 157 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 159 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 164 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.7 s |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.7 s
3.1 s
bronners.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Render-blocking requests
9.5 s10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 9.5 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
6.0 s · 1.0 MB18 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.0 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.9 s · 941 KiBAbout 941 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.9 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 35
35/100Your mobile performance score is 35 (desktop: 23). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Improve image delivery
700 ms · 2.9 MB10 images could be 2.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 700 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Accessibe Accessibility Overlay and Facebook and others), adding 1.2 MB and 618 ms of main-thread time.
13 long tasks on the main thread
13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 654 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
390 ms · 154 KiBAbout 154 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 390 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 306 ms
306 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 306 ms of main-thread work and 389 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.6 s
A phone's processor spends 2.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Accessibe Accessibility Overlay adds 119 ms
119 msAccessibe Accessibility Overlay costs a phone 119 ms of main-thread work and 437 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 34 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 34 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
150 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).
Minify JavaScript
17 KiB17 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user INP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.40
0.40For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.40 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 11.5 s
11.5 sThe first text or image appears after 11.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 26.7 s
26.7 sYour largest element takes 26.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 27.6 s
27.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 27.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 11.5 s
11.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 921 ms
921 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 921 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Tap response (INP) got 1934% slower for real visitors
+1934%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 155 ms to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
8 images without width and height
8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
3 checks passed
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 16% faster for real visitors
-16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.3 s to 3.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 8.6 MB in 98 requests
8.6 MBYour homepage downloads 8.6 MB in 98 requests on a phone: images 6.2 MB (25), scripts 2.0 MB (31) and stylesheets 170 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 3.1 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
halloween-2026-mobile.gif is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
2 images far larger than shown
107 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example store-exterior-aerial.jpg at 1,600 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 107 KiB.
About 2.5 g of CO₂ per visit
2.45 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.45 g of CO₂e: 294.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
36 text elements with low contrast
36 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
9 tap targets too small
9 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Hidden but focusable
5 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
7 links without text
7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h1 → h3 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 10 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is long (170 characters)
Your meta description is 170 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
175 internal links, 10 external
The homepage links to 175 pages on bronners.com and 10 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Shop World's Largest Christmas Store”.
Title: 62 characters
Your title is a healthy 62 characters: “Bronner's Christmas Wonderland World's Largest Christmas Store”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.bronners.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.bronners.com/sitemap_www.bronners.com_Index.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (606 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
14 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 14 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /christmas-lights, whose canonical is /christmas-lights?page=1. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 159 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Synchronous `XMLHttpRequest` on the main thread is deprecated because of its detrimental effects to…”).
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught ReferenceError: ltkCallback8367 is not defined”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
38 of 46 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (bronners.com).
Valid certificate (48 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for bronners.com and is valid for another 48 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
http:// redirects to https
http://bronners.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 49 links work
All 49 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 9 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
bronners.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
bronners.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 30 years old
30 yearsbronners.com was registered in Jun 1996 through NameCheap, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Jun 2027
bronners.com is registered until Jun 2027.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 444 words of copy
The homepage carries about 444 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “REGISTER” and “SHOP NOW”.
7 calls to action
The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Quick Order”, “Register” and “Shop Now”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 100/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:35.131.254.218 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:sent-via.netsuite.com include:certcapture.avalara.…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1” and “selector2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
12 cookies set on arrival
12Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
14 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 52 issues on bronners.com, including 23 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.