Website review, no card needed
brother.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202636 issues · 94 checks
This review found 36 issues worth fixing on brother.com, 10 of them high impact, across 94 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 228 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 221 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 218 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 219 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 224 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 217 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 229 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 257 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 278 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 276 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 278 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 280 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 285 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 296 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 305 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 308 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 305 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 296 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 286 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 287 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 289 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 295 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.1 s
1.7 s
2.3 s
2.8 s
3.4 s
4.0 s
4.5 s
brother.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.8 s · 3.9 MB51 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.9 MB).
Mobile performance score: 48
48/100Your mobile performance score is 48 (desktop: 55). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Reduce unused JavaScript
750 ms · 729 KiBAbout 729 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
600 ms · 536 KiB21 images could be 536 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
600 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 600 ms.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Tealium, Optanon and Bazaarvoice and others), adding 1.1 MB and 416 ms of main-thread time.
10 long tasks on the main thread
10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 383 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Main-thread work: 3.3 s
A phone's processor spends 3.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Optanon adds 75 ms
75 msOptanon costs a phone 75 ms of main-thread work and 654 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 35 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 35 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
23 KiBAbout 23 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 25 ms
25 msYour server sent the HTML in 25 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user INP: 558 ms
558 msReal visitors wait 558 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Time to Interactive: 20.0 s
20.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 20.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 5.1 s
5.1 sYour largest element takes 5.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Speed Index: 6.9 s
6.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s
3.3 sThe first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 663 ms
663 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 663 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.12
0.12For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.12 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 30% slower for real visitors
+30%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 228 ms to 295 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.119
0.119The layout shifts by 0.119 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
2 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 39% faster for real visitors
-39%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.3 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.8 MB in 98 requests
5.8 MBYour homepage downloads 5.8 MB in 98 requests on a phone: media 2.5 MB (1), scripts 1.6 MB (32) and images 1.4 MB (39). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
15 images below the first screen load straight away
15 images further down the page (583 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
5 images far larger than shown
78 KiB5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example REFRESH_36_jpg at 900 px wide, shown at 275 px. Resized copies would save about 78 KiB.
2 images in older formats
2 images (445 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit
1.64 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.64 g of CO₂e: 197.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
All page content should be contained by landmarks (6 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 45 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 1 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (70 characters)
Your title is 70 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Printers, Sewing Machines, Label Makers & Business Solutions | Brother”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
33 internal links, 1 external
The homepage links to 33 pages on brother.com and 1 external page.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 129 characters
Your meta description is 129 characters: “From fun crafts to home organization to serious home office productivity, Brother has what you need for your home or ho…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Brother - Printers, Sewing Machines, Label Makers for Home & Business”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.brother-usa.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: OnlineStore.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.brother-usa.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (970 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
/ink-toner/learn-more/refresh-auto-reorder has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 29 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
25 of 28 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
http:// does not redirect
http://brother.com does not redirect to https, so some visitors land on the insecure version.
1 broken external link
1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://refresh.brother-usa.com/TermsOfUse (500).
Short HSTS lifetime
HSTS is set, but max-age is 180 days; one year is the recommended minimum.
2 redirects before the homepage
Opening https://brother.com goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (brother-usa.com).
Valid certificate (64 days left)
The certificate from Starfield Technologies · Starfield TLS Intermediate CA DV - R1v1 verifies for brother.com and is valid for another 64 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
brother-usa.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
brother-usa.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 26 years old
26 yearsbrother-usa.com was registered in Apr 2000 through GoDaddy Corporate Domains, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Apr 2028
brother-usa.com is registered until Apr 2028.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
About 373 words of copy
The homepage carries about 373 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop All” and “Shop Deals”.
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Shop All”, “Shop Deals” and “Learn More”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be brother.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.
Email authentication score: 75/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:rnmk.com include:mktomail.com include:amazonses.com include:spf.const…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “k1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
19 cookies set on arrival
19Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
21 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 21 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
2 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Hosting
- AWS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 36 issues on brother.com, including 21 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.