Website review, no card needed
bt.no website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202633 issues · 95 checks
This review found 33 issues worth fixing on bt.no, 15 of them high impact, across 95 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
81BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 773 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 781 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 771 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 763 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 751 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 731 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 716 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 702 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 697 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 706 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 719 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 720 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 708 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 698 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 679 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 673 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 671 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 665 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 660 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 656 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 648 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 635 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 637 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 628 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 625 ms |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 68 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 67 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 67 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 67 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 67 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 69 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 71 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 73 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 80 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.9 s
1.3 s
1.8 s
2.2 s
2.7 s
3.1 s
3.6 s
bt.no does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.6 s · 362 KiBAbout 362 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
1.4 s · 295 KiB4 images could be 295 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.3 s · 406 KiB34 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (406 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 54
54/100Your mobile performance score is 54 (desktop: 65). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Legacy JavaScript
450 ms · 51 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 51 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (schibsted.tech, schibsted.media and Bing Ads and others), adding 1.3 MB and 262 ms of main-thread time.
Main-thread work: 2.5 s
A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
vgc.no adds 0 ms
0 msvgc.no costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 787 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Duplicated JavaScript
200 ms · 6 KiB6 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.
5 long tasks on the main thread
5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 191 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 129 ms
129 msYour server sent the HTML in 129 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 13.5 s
13.5 sYour largest element takes 13.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
First Contentful Paint: 6.3 s
6.3 sThe first text or image appears after 6.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 13.5 s
13.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 13.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.9 s
7.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 222 ms
222 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 222 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 19% slower for real visitors
+19%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 68 ms to 80 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 0.5 s
0.5 sReal visitors wait 0.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 78 ms
78 msReal visitors wait 78 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.4 s
0.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 197 ms
197 msReal visitors wait 197 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 19% faster for real visitors
-19%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.8 s to 0.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.8 MB in 177 requests
4.8 MBYour homepage downloads 4.8 MB in 177 requests on a phone: fonts 2.0 MB (22), images 1.6 MB (21) and scripts 994 KiB (92). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image in older formats
1 image (174 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit
1.37 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.37 g of CO₂e: 164.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
3 images without alt text
3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 checks passed
51 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 2 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (15 characters)
Your title is only 15 characters: “Bergens Tidende”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (NewsMediaOrganization) but with 1 problem, for example “NewsMediaOrganization: missing @context (expected "https://schema.org")”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
93 internal links, 16 external
The homepage links to 93 pages on bt.no and 16 external pages.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 107 characters
Your meta description is 107 characters: “Vestlandets største regionavis med alltid oppdaterte nyheter innenfor innenriks, utenriks, sport og kultur.”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.bt.no/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.bt.no/sitemaps/files/articles-48hrs.xml.
AI search readiness
robots.txt blocks 2 AI answer engine crawlers
2 of 6Your robots.txt shuts out Claude search (Claude-SearchBot) and Perplexity (PerplexityBot). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 4 crawlers
robots.txt blocks ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.
2 checks passed
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (395 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page is broken
Your homepage links to /minside, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.
1 linked page hidden from search
/direkte/trafikken-direkte is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages share a title
/ and /varsler all use the title “Bergens Tidende”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
1 page without a meta description
/spesial/tips-oss has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /nyheter/innenriks, whose canonical is /innenriks. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
2 pages without an H1
/v%C3%A6ret and /varsler have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages with very little text
/v%C3%A6ret and /varsler have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 78 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
1 checks passed
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 400 ()”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
18 of 19 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
Short HSTS lifetime
HSTS is set, but max-age is 182 days; one year is the recommended minimum.
6 links through redirect chains
6 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.bt.no/minside.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
8 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (bt.no).
Valid certificate (128 days left)
The certificate from Amazon · Amazon RSA 2048 M04 verifies for bt.no and is valid for another 128 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
http:// redirects to https
http://bt.no redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 55 links work
All 55 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 15 external) answered without errors; 2 did not answer within 5 s.
security.txt published
A security.txt file tells researchers how to report a problem with your site.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
bt.no has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
bt.no's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
1 checks passed
Domain is 14 years old
14 yearsbt.no was registered in Jun 2012 through Name SRS. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 300 words of copy
The homepage carries about 300 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo and 3 trust badges.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 6 email links.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 95/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_u.bt.no._spf.smart.ondmarc.com ~all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google” and “selector1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Xandr (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
17 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Astro
- Hosting
- CloudFront
Company
- Founded
- 1868
- Headquarters
- Bergen
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 33 issues on bt.no, including 13 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.