Website review, no card needed

bt.no logo

bt.no website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202633 issues · 95 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on bt.no, 15 of them high impact, across 95 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
804 ms602 msMay 9Oct 24625 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 2026773 ms
May 16, 2026781 ms
May 23, 2026771 ms
May 30, 2026763 ms
Jun 6, 2026751 ms
Jun 13, 2026731 ms
Jun 20, 2026716 ms
Jun 27, 2026702 ms
Jul 4, 2026697 ms
Jul 11, 2026706 ms
Jul 18, 2026719 ms
Jul 25, 2026720 ms
Aug 1, 2026708 ms
Aug 8, 2026698 ms
Aug 15, 2026679 ms
Aug 22, 2026673 ms
Aug 29, 2026671 ms
Sep 5, 2026665 ms
Sep 12, 2026660 ms
Sep 19, 2026656 ms
Sep 26, 2026648 ms
Oct 3, 2026635 ms
Oct 10, 2026637 ms
Oct 17, 2026628 ms
Oct 24, 2026625 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
82 ms65 msMay 9Oct 2480 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202668 ms
May 16, 202667 ms
May 23, 202667 ms
May 30, 202667 ms
Jun 6, 202667 ms
Jun 13, 202669 ms
Jun 20, 202671 ms
Jun 27, 202673 ms
Jul 4, 202677 ms
Jul 11, 202679 ms
Jul 18, 202679 ms
Jul 25, 202679 ms
Aug 1, 202680 ms
Aug 8, 202679 ms
Aug 15, 202679 ms
Aug 22, 202679 ms
Aug 29, 202679 ms
Sep 5, 202679 ms
Sep 12, 202679 ms
Sep 19, 202679 ms
Sep 26, 202679 ms
Oct 3, 202679 ms
Oct 10, 202680 ms
Oct 17, 202680 ms
Oct 24, 202680 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of bt.no (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. bt.no at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. bt.no at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. bt.no at 1.3 s1.3 s
  4. bt.no at 1.8 s1.8 s
  5. bt.no at 2.2 s2.2 s
  6. bt.no at 2.7 s2.7 s
  7. bt.no at 3.1 s3.1 s
  8. bt.no at 3.6 s3.6 s

bt.no does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

8 to fix54
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.6 s · 362 KiB

    About 362 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.4 s · 295 KiB

    4 images could be 295 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.3 s · 406 KiB

    34 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (406 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 54

    54/100

    Your mobile performance score is 54 (desktop: 65). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    450 ms · 51 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 51 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (schibsted.tech, schibsted.media and Bing Ads and others), adding 1.3 MB and 262 ms of main-thread time.

  • Main-thread work: 2.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • vgc.no adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    vgc.no costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 787 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    200 ms · 6 KiB

    6 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 191 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Render-blocking requests

    150 ms

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 129 ms

    129 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 129 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 13.5 s

    13.5 s

    Your largest element takes 13.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.3 s

    6.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 13.5 s

    13.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 13.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.9 s

    7.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 222 ms

    222 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 222 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 19% slower for real visitors

    +19%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 68 ms to 80 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 0.5 s

    0.5 s

    Real visitors wait 0.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 78 ms

    78 ms

    Real visitors wait 78 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.4 s

    0.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 197 ms

    197 ms

    Real visitors wait 197 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 19% faster for real visitors

    -19%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.8 s to 0.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 4.8 MB in 177 requests

    4.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.8 MB in 177 requests on a phone: fonts 2.0 MB (22), images 1.6 MB (21) and scripts 994 KiB (92). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (174 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.37 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.37 g of CO₂e: 164.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 10095
  • Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 3 images without alt text

    3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 51 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 2 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 10076
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (15 characters)

    Your title is only 15 characters: “Bergens Tidende”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (NewsMediaOrganization) but with 1 problem, for example “NewsMediaOrganization: missing @context (expected "https://schema.org")”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 93 internal links, 16 external

    The homepage links to 93 pages on bt.no and 16 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 107 characters

    Your meta description is 107 characters: “Vestlandets største regionavis med alltid oppdaterte nyheter innenfor innenriks, utenriks, sport og kultur.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.bt.no/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.bt.no/sitemaps/files/articles-48hrs.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix65
  • robots.txt blocks 2 AI answer engine crawlers

    2 of 6

    Your robots.txt shuts out Claude search (Claude-SearchBot) and Perplexity (PerplexityBot). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 4 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.

2 checks passed
  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (395 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

6 to fix45
  • 1 linked page is broken

    Your homepage links to /minside, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.

  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    /direkte/trafikken-direkte is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 2 pages share a title

    / and /varsler all use the title “Bergens Tidende”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    /spesial/tips-oss has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /nyheter/innenriks, whose canonical is /innenriks. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    /v%C3%A6ret and /varsler have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    /v%C3%A6ret and /varsler have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 78 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

1 checks passed
  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 400 ()”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    18 of 19 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • Short HSTS lifetime

    HSTS is set, but max-age is 182 days; one year is the recommended minimum.

  • 6 links through redirect chains

    6 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.bt.no/minside.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (bt.no).

  • Valid certificate (128 days left)

    The certificate from Amazon · Amazon RSA 2048 M04 verifies for bt.no and is valid for another 128 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://bt.no redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 55 links work

    All 55 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 15 external) answered without errors; 2 did not answer within 5 s.

  • security.txt published

    A security.txt file tells researchers how to report a problem with your site.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    bt.no has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    bt.no's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

1 checks passed
  • Domain is 14 years old

    14 years

    bt.no was registered in Jun 2012 through Name SRS. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 300 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 300 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo and 3 trust badges.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 6 email links.

Email authentication

95
  • Email authentication score: 95/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_u.bt.no._spf.smart.ondmarc.com ~all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google” and “selector1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Xandr (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 17 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Astro
Hosting
CloudFront

Company

Founded
1868
Headquarters
Bergen

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on bt.no, including 13 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25