Website review, no card needed

bury.com logo

bury.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202640 issues · 82 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on bury.com, 18 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: avoid multiple page redirects. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.6 s3.8 sMay 9Oct 244.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.9 s
May 16, 20263.9 s
May 23, 20264.0 s
May 30, 20264.0 s
Jun 6, 20264.2 s
Jun 13, 20264.1 s
Jun 20, 20264.1 s
Jun 27, 20264.1 s
Jul 4, 20264.0 s
Jul 11, 20264.0 s
Jul 18, 20264.0 s
Jul 25, 20264.0 s
Aug 1, 20264.1 s
Aug 8, 20264.4 s
Aug 15, 20264.5 s
Aug 22, 20264.4 s
Aug 29, 20264.4 s
Sep 5, 20264.3 s
Sep 12, 20264.4 s
Sep 19, 20264.3 s
Sep 26, 20264.3 s
Oct 3, 20264.3 s
Oct 10, 20264.2 s
Oct 17, 20264.2 s
Oct 24, 20264.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
101 ms84 msMay 9Oct 2499 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202695 ms
May 16, 202695 ms
May 23, 202695 ms
May 30, 202689 ms
Jun 6, 202691 ms
Jun 13, 202692 ms
Jun 20, 202689 ms
Jun 27, 202692 ms
Jul 4, 202696 ms
Jul 11, 202697 ms
Jul 18, 202696 ms
Jul 25, 202693 ms
Aug 1, 202692 ms
Aug 8, 202687 ms
Aug 15, 202688 ms
Aug 22, 202692 ms
Aug 29, 202686 ms
Sep 5, 202695 ms
Sep 12, 202695 ms
Sep 19, 202692 ms
Sep 26, 202693 ms
Oct 3, 202691 ms
Oct 10, 202693 ms
Oct 17, 202695 ms
Oct 24, 202699 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of bury.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. bury.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. bury.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. bury.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. bury.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. bury.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. bury.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. bury.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. bury.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

8 to fix53
  • Avoid multiple page redirects

    16.0 s

    The page goes through 1 redirect before it starts loading, costing about 16.0 s. Link and advertise the final URL directly.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    10.8 s · 1.3 MB

    About 1.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 10.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.0 s

    13 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.0 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 53

    53/100

    Your mobile performance score is 53 (desktop: 57). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Font display

    800 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 800 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    500 ms · 47 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 47 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 2.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • YouTube adds 51 ms

    51 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 51 ms of main-thread work and 744 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 130 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube and Google Fonts), adding 782 KiB and 51 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    52 KiB

    About 52 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 137 ms

    137 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 137 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    Real visitors wait 4.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Real visitors wait 3.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 15.4 s

    15.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 15.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 30.5 s

    30.5 s

    Your largest element takes 30.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 31.9 s

    31.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 31.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 15.4 s

    15.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 15.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 95 ms to 99 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.9 s to 4.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 98 ms

    98 ms

    Real visitors wait 98 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 154 ms

    154 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 154 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.023

    0.023

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.023, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 34.3 MB in 107 requests

    34.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 34.3 MB in 107 requests on a phone: media 26.2 MB (2), images 4.0 MB (24) and scripts 2.2 MB (28). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 9.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    9.73 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 9.73 g of CO₂e: 1168.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 8892
  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 13 links without text

    13 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 2 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 5 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 8578
  • Title is short (20 characters)

    Your title is only 20 characters: “Strona główna - BURY”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Meta description is long (244 characters)

    Your meta description is 244 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • 144 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 144 pages on bury.com and 5 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.bury.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.bury.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,369 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 2 pages share a title

    / and /en all use the title “Strona główna - BURY”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 15 pages without a meta description

    /en, /de, /es, /o-firmie/dane-i-fakty, /o-firmie/historia and /o-firmie/jakosc and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    /kariera, /dlaczego-bury and /rekrutacja have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 5 pages slow to respond

    /en, /de, /es, /o-firmie/dane-i-fakty and /o-firmie/historia took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 101 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7385
  • 5 small tap targets

    5 of 11 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Creating a worker from 'blob:https://www.bury.com/129e9c2d-9a04-44cc-ad98-24a5c7ce1576' violates the following Content …”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 600 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 600 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 9 cookies set on arrival

    9

    Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 9 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at bury.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
Cf Krk

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on bury.com, including 17 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25