Website review, no card needed
bury.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202640 issues · 82 checks
This review found 40 issues worth fixing on bury.com, 18 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: avoid multiple page redirects. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
71CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 95 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 95 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 95 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 91 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 91 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 99 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Avoid multiple page redirects
16.0 sThe page goes through 1 redirect before it starts loading, costing about 16.0 s. Link and advertise the final URL directly.
Reduce unused JavaScript
10.8 s · 1.3 MBAbout 1.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 10.8 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.0 s13 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.0 s.
Mobile performance score: 53
53/100Your mobile performance score is 53 (desktop: 57). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Font display
800 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 800 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
500 ms · 47 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 47 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 2.6 s
A phone's processor spends 2.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
YouTube adds 51 ms
51 msYouTube costs a phone 51 ms of main-thread work and 744 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
11 long tasks on the main thread
11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 130 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube and Google Fonts), adding 782 KiB and 51 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
52 KiBAbout 52 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Minify JavaScript
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 137 ms
137 msYour server sent the HTML in 137 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.1 s
4.1 sReal visitors wait 4.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.8 s
3.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 3.6 s
3.6 sReal visitors wait 3.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 15.4 s
15.4 sThe first text or image appears after 15.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 30.5 s
30.5 sYour largest element takes 30.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.
Time to Interactive: 31.9 s
31.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 31.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 15.4 s
15.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 15.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 95 ms to 99 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.9 s to 4.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 98 ms
98 msReal visitors wait 98 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 154 ms
154 msScripts block the page for only 154 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.023
0.023The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.023, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 34.3 MB in 107 requests
34.3 MBYour homepage downloads 34.3 MB in 107 requests on a phone: media 26.2 MB (2), images 4.0 MB (24) and scripts 2.2 MB (28). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 9.7 g of CO₂ per visit
9.73 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 9.73 g of CO₂e: 1168.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
13 links without text
13 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 2 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 5 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (20 characters)
Your title is only 20 characters: “Strona główna - BURY”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Meta description is long (244 characters)
Your meta description is 244 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
One H1 headline
Your <h1> is empty.
144 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 144 pages on bury.com and 5 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.bury.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.bury.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,369 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
/ and /en all use the title “Strona główna - BURY”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
15 pages without a meta description
/en, /de, /es, /o-firmie/dane-i-fakty, /o-firmie/historia and /o-firmie/jakosc and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 pages without an H1
/kariera, /dlaczego-bury and /rekrutacja have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
5 pages slow to respond
/en, /de, /es, /o-firmie/dane-i-fakty and /o-firmie/historia took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 101 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 small tap targets
5 of 11 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Creating a worker from 'blob:https://www.bury.com/129e9c2d-9a04-44cc-ad98-24a5c7ce1576' violates the following Content …”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 600 words of copy
The homepage carries about 600 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
9 cookies set on arrival
9Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
9 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at bury.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Cf Krk
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 40 issues on bury.com, including 17 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.