Website review, no card needed

cariuma.sk logo

cariuma.sk website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 November 202643 issues · 81 checks

This review found 43 issues worth fixing on cariuma.sk, 10 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 55.4 MB in 337 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.7 s1.4 sMay 23Jul 251.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20261.6 s
May 30, 20261.5 s
Jun 6, 20261.5 s
Jun 13, 20261.5 s
Jun 20, 20261.5 s
Jun 27, 20261.5 s
Jul 4, 20261.5 s
Jul 11, 20261.5 s
Jul 18, 20261.5 s
Jul 25, 20261.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
205 ms119 msMay 23Jul 25129 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026187 ms
May 30, 2026165 ms
Jun 6, 2026156 ms
Jun 13, 2026176 ms
Jun 20, 2026183 ms
Jun 27, 2026195 ms
Jul 4, 2026182 ms
Jul 11, 2026175 ms
Jul 18, 2026152 ms
Jul 25, 2026129 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of cariuma.sk (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. cariuma.sk at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. cariuma.sk at 1.7 s1.7 s
  3. cariuma.sk at 2.6 s2.6 s
  4. cariuma.sk at 3.4 s3.4 s
  5. cariuma.sk at 4.3 s4.3 s
  6. cariuma.sk at 5.2 s5.2 s
  7. cariuma.sk at 6.0 s6.0 s
  8. cariuma.sk at 6.9 s6.9 s

Speed

9 to fix60
  • Improve image delivery

    450 ms · 618 KiB

    7 images could be 618 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, cariuma.cz and Facebook and others), adding 1.3 MB and 886 ms of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 60

    60/100

    Your mobile performance score is 60. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 335 KiB

    12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (335 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    474 KiB

    About 474 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Main-thread work: 3.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 265 ms

    265 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 265 ms of main-thread work and 357 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • cariuma.cz adds 231 ms

    231 ms

    cariuma.cz costs a phone 231 ms of main-thread work and 365 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,835 HTML elements

    The page has 1,835 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Render-blocking requests

    200 ms

    8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 200 ms.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 39 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 39 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 184 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 8 ms

    8 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix59
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.6 s

    11.6 s

    Your largest element takes 11.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 17.2 s

    17.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 17.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.7 s

    6.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 312 ms

    312 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 312 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 17 images without width and height

    17 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

2 checks passed
  • Tap response (INP) got 20% faster for real visitors

    -20%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 187 ms to 129 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.022

    0.022

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.022, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix53
  • Page weight: 55.4 MB in 337 requests

    55.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 55.4 MB in 337 requests on a phone: media 51.1 MB (3), scripts 1.5 MB (82) and images 1.4 MB (49). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    HP_Suede_SK_Mobile_V2.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 6 images in older formats

    6 images (536 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 15.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    15.70 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 15.70 g of CO₂e: 1884.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 8188
  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • 4 text elements with low contrast

    4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 3 tap targets too small

    3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 24 images without alt text

    24 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (12 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (6 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 50 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 60 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 10 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9276
  • Title is long (79 characters)

    Your title is 79 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Pohodlné udržateľné topánky & najlepšie skate tenisky – C A R I U M A – CARIUMA”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Cariuma Logo” and “Cariuma Logo”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (205 characters)

    Your meta description is 205 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 153 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 153 pages on cariuma.sk and 5 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://cariuma.sk/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://cariuma.sk/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (640 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://cariuma.sk/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://cariuma.sk/pages/reforestation is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 7 pages without a meta description

    https://cariuma.sk/collections/leather-women, https://cariuma.sk/collections/skate-men, https://cariuma.sk/collections/collaborations-women, https://cariuma.sk/collections/catiba-pro-2-0-men, https://cariuma.sk/collections/uba-men and https://cariuma.sk/collections/naioca-men and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 5 pages without an H1

    https://cariuma.sk/collections/men, https://cariuma.sk/collections/women, https://cariuma.sk/collections/leather-women, https://cariuma.sk/pages/about-us and https://cariuma.sk/pages/about-us-sustainability have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    https://cariuma.sk/collections/luan-pro-men took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 53 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9291
  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    36 of 41 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 415 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 415 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 5 short forms

    5 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 2 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 13 cookies set on arrival

    13

    Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 23 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 23 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at cariuma.sk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 7 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Pandectes Gdpr · Langify · Judge Me Reviews · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Gdpr Cookie Consent · Stape Remix · useamp.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 43 issues on cariuma.sk, including 15 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25