Website review, no card needed

catit.fr logo

catit.fr website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202625 issues · 73 checks

This review found 25 issues worth fixing on catit.fr, 8 of them high impact, across 73 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.6 s1.6 sMay 23Nov 72.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20262.1 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20261.7 s
Jun 13, 20261.7 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20261.7 s
Jul 4, 20261.7 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.8 s
Aug 1, 20261.7 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.8 s
Aug 29, 20261.8 s
Sep 5, 20262.0 s
Sep 12, 20262.2 s
Sep 19, 20262.4 s
Sep 26, 20262.5 s
Oct 3, 20262.4 s
Oct 10, 20262.4 s
Oct 17, 20262.4 s
Oct 24, 20262.4 s
Oct 31, 20262.4 s
Nov 7, 20262.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
151 ms106 msMay 23Nov 7111 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026145 ms
May 30, 2026146 ms
Jun 6, 2026145 ms
Jun 13, 2026145 ms
Jun 20, 2026142 ms
Jun 27, 2026135 ms
Jul 4, 2026128 ms
Jul 11, 2026120 ms
Jul 18, 2026116 ms
Jul 25, 2026114 ms
Aug 1, 2026114 ms
Aug 8, 2026113 ms
Aug 15, 2026113 ms
Aug 22, 2026113 ms
Aug 29, 2026114 ms
Sep 5, 2026114 ms
Sep 12, 2026113 ms
Sep 19, 2026112 ms
Sep 26, 2026112 ms
Oct 3, 2026112 ms
Oct 10, 2026112 ms
Oct 17, 2026113 ms
Oct 24, 2026113 ms
Oct 31, 2026112 ms
Nov 7, 2026111 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of catit.fr (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. catit.fr at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. catit.fr at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. catit.fr at 1.5 s1.5 s
  4. catit.fr at 2.0 s2.0 s
  5. catit.fr at 2.5 s2.5 s
  6. catit.fr at 3.0 s3.0 s
  7. catit.fr at 3.5 s3.5 s
  8. catit.fr at 4.0 s4.0 s

Speed

3 to fix73
  • Improve image delivery

    2.0 s · 392 KiB

    1 image could be 392 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 73

    73/100

    Your mobile performance score is 73. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    550 ms

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 550 ms.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    143 KiB

    8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (143 KiB).

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Bazaarvoice, wayvia.com and Cloudflare and others), adding 184 KiB and 114 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    124 KiB

    About 124 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    52 KiB

    About 52 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 51 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    10 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 533 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 120 ms

    120 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 120 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix50
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.4 s

    5.4 s

    Your largest element takes 5.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 6.9 s

    6.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 24% slower for real visitors

    +24%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 6.8 s

    6.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 6.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

5 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 23% faster for real visitors

    -23%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 145 ms to 111 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 1 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix83
  • 30 images below the first screen load straight away

    30 images further down the page (1.5 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (663 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.38 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.38 g of CO₂e: 46.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.4 MB in 69 requests

    1.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.4 MB in 69 requests on a phone: images 595 KiB (11), scripts 528 KiB (49) and fonts 172 KiB (4). That is a lean page.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9696
  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 12 links without text

    12 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 53 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 38 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 39 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 1 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10091
  • Meta description is long (211 characters)

    Your meta description is 211 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization and WebPage) but with 1 problem, for example “BreadcrumbList: itemListElement is an empty list”.

  • 122 internal links, 42 external

    The homepage links to 122 pages on catit.fr and 42 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Bienvenue sur le site de la marque Catit”.

  • Title: 49 characters

    Your title is a healthy 49 characters: “Bienvenue sur le site officiel de la marque Catit”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.catit.com/fr/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.catit.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (899 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.catit.com/llms.txt (3 KiB, 16 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.catit.com/fr and https://www.catit.com/fr-fr all use the title “Bienvenue sur le site officiel de la marque Catit”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.catit.com/fr/enregistrement-produits and https://www.catit.com/fr/preferences-pour-site-web have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    / and https://www.catit.com/ja use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 4 pages slow to respond

    https://www.catit.com/fr/ca/contact, https://www.catit.com/pl, https://www.catit.com/ja and https://www.catit.com/fr/aide-conseils/jouets/jardiniere-dherbe-senses took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 86 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    21 of 25 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 794 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 794 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 8 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at catit.fr, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
Shopify;Shopify Plus
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 25 issues on catit.fr, including 11 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25