Website review, no card needed
caxton.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202632 issues · 93 checks
This review found 32 issues worth fixing on caxton.com, 9 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
78CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 97 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 97 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 110 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
caxton.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.9 s20 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.5 s · 286 KiBAbout 286 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 57
57/100Your mobile performance score is 57. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
600 ms · 148 KiBAbout 148 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
350 ms · 35 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 35 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.
Google CDN adds 180 ms
180 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 180 ms of main-thread work and 349 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Cloudflare CDN and FontAwesome CDN and others), adding 462 KiB and 217 ms of main-thread time.
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 212 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.4 s
A phone's processor spends 1.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 462 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 9.6 s
9.6 sYour largest element takes 9.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “A relentless pursuit of excellence.”.
First Contentful Paint: 6.3 s
6.3 sThe first text or image appears after 6.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 9.6 s
9.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 9.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.4 s
6.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.6 s
2.6 sReal visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 854 ms
854 msReal visitors wait 854 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 97 ms to 110 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 101 ms
101 msReal visitors wait 101 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.07
0.07For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.07 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 162 ms
162 msScripts block the page for only 162 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.004
0.004The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.004, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.0 MB in 51 requests
2.0 MBYour homepage downloads 2.0 MB in 51 requests on a phone: images 1.1 MB (7), scripts 591 KiB (21) and stylesheets 180 KiB (15). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit
0.57 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.57 g of CO₂e: 68.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h2 → h5 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 2 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.caxton.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at caxton.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
10 internal links, 3 external
The homepage links to 10 pages on caxton.com and 3 external pages.
3 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “A relentless pursuit of excellence.”.
Title: 32 characters
Your title is a healthy 32 characters: “Caxton | Global Macro Hedge Fund”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.caxton.com/.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
1 checks passed
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (938 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
3 pages without a meta description
/careers, /disclosures and /terms-of-use have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page without an H1
/careers has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages slow to respond
/careers, /disclosures and /terms-of-use took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
3 internal pages checked
We fetched 3 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 3 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 3 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Refused to apply style from 'https://www.caxton.com/wp-content/uploads/font-awesome/v5.15.4/css/svg-with-js.css' becaus…”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
8 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (caxton.com).
Valid certificate (74 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for caxton.com and is valid for another 74 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://caxton.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 8 links work
All 8 links checked from your homepage (5 internal, 3 external) answered without errors; 2 did not answer within 5 s.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
caxton.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 890 words of copy
The homepage carries about 890 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact” and “Join our team”.
1 short form
A short form (4 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 100/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf1.caxton.com ip4:204.122.12.0/28 ip4:204.122.8.0/28 ip4:74.217.224…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
7 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Company
- Founded
- 1983
- Headquarters
- Berkeley Square
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 32 issues on caxton.com, including 14 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.