Website review, no card needed

ccas.fr logo

ccas.fr website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202644 issues · 96 checks

This review found 44 issues worth fixing on ccas.fr, 15 of them high impact, across 96 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.3 s1.3 sMay 9Oct 241.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.8 s
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20262.0 s
Jun 6, 20262.1 s
Jun 13, 20262.2 s
Jun 20, 20262.0 s
Jun 27, 20261.9 s
Jul 4, 20261.7 s
Jul 11, 20261.6 s
Jul 18, 20261.6 s
Jul 25, 20261.7 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20261.9 s
Aug 15, 20261.9 s
Aug 22, 20261.8 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.6 s
Sep 12, 20261.6 s
Sep 19, 20261.6 s
Sep 26, 20261.6 s
Oct 3, 20261.5 s
Oct 10, 20261.5 s
Oct 17, 20261.4 s
Oct 24, 20261.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
163 ms156 msMay 9Oct 24157 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026160 ms
May 16, 2026161 ms
May 23, 2026160 ms
May 30, 2026161 ms
Jun 6, 2026162 ms
Jun 13, 2026161 ms
Jun 20, 2026161 ms
Jun 27, 2026162 ms
Jul 4, 2026161 ms
Jul 11, 2026161 ms
Jul 18, 2026161 ms
Jul 25, 2026161 ms
Aug 1, 2026160 ms
Aug 8, 2026160 ms
Aug 15, 2026160 ms
Aug 22, 2026159 ms
Aug 29, 2026159 ms
Sep 5, 2026160 ms
Sep 12, 2026161 ms
Sep 19, 2026160 ms
Sep 26, 2026160 ms
Oct 3, 2026158 ms
Oct 10, 2026157 ms
Oct 17, 2026157 ms
Oct 24, 2026157 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of ccas.fr (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. ccas.fr at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. ccas.fr at 1.3 s1.3 s
  3. ccas.fr at 1.9 s1.9 s
  4. ccas.fr at 2.6 s2.6 s
  5. ccas.fr at 3.2 s3.2 s
  6. ccas.fr at 3.9 s3.9 s
  7. ccas.fr at 4.5 s4.5 s
  8. ccas.fr at 5.2 s5.2 s

ccas.fr does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

9 to fix44
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    10.9 s · 1.2 MB

    About 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 10.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.4 s

    24 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.4 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.8 s · 379 KiB

    81 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (379 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 44

    44/100

    Your mobile performance score is 44 (desktop: 70). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Improve image delivery

    900 ms · 538 KiB

    6 images could be 538 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Vimeo, tarteaucitron.io and Google Fonts), adding 2.2 MB and 645 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    670 ms · 159 KiB

    About 159 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 670 ms faster on a phone.

  • Vimeo adds 513 ms

    513 ms

    Vimeo costs a phone 513 ms of main-thread work and 2.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    200 ms · 18 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 18 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • 18 long tasks on the main thread

    18 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 196 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    150 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 70 but mobile only 44. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 118 ms

    118 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 118 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 24.1 s

    24.1 s

    Your largest element takes 24.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 24.5 s

    24.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 24.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 11.1 s

    11.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.0 s

    4.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 528 ms

    528 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 528 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 160 ms to 157 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 157 ms

    157 ms

    Real visitors wait 157 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.10

    0.10

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.10 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 536 ms

    536 ms

    Real visitors wait 536 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 20% faster for real visitors

    -20%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix75
  • Page weight: 3.9 MB in 127 requests

    3.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.9 MB in 127 requests on a phone: scripts 2.1 MB (47), images 1.1 MB (25) and stylesheets 318 KiB (26). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 7 images in older formats

    7 images (784 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.11 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.11 g of CO₂e: 132.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8891
  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (43 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 43 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 5 form fields without a label

    5 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5, h2 → h5 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 26 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 37 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

8 to fixGoogle 10064
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Canonical points to another host

    Your canonical URL points to nosoffres.ccas.fr, not ccas.fr, so Google may credit that host instead.

  • Meta description is long (162 characters)

    Your meta description is 162 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Article, Organization, Person and WebPage) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: url points at a different host (https://nosoffres.ccas.fr)”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://ccas.fr/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at ccas.fr/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

1 checks passed
  • Title: 57 characters

    Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “Activités Sociales des Industries Electriques et Gazières”.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (765 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 5488
  • 2 third-party cookies

    2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'nodeName')”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    31 of 33 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

3 to fix81
  • 1 broken external link

    1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://gdscatalogueur.ccas.fr/search?gamme=0 (508).

  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

5 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (ccas.fr).

  • Valid certificate (24 days left)

    The certificate from GlobalSign nv-sa · GlobalSign GCC R3 DV TLS CA 2020 verifies for ccas.fr and is valid for another 24 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://ccas.fr redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    ccas.fr has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 28 years old

    28 years

    ccas.fr was registered in May 1998 through Orange Business Services SA, direction EOLAS. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Mar 2028

    ccas.fr is registered until Mar 2028.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 359 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 359 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact presse”.

  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Matomo.

Email authentication

3 to fix0
  • No DMARC policy

    ccas.fr has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.

  • No SPF record

    ccas.fr has no SPF record, so mail servers can't tell which servers may send email as you. Your mail lands in spam more often, and anyone can send mail pretending to be you.

  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Email authentication score: 0/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 8 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

  • It runs WordPress 7.0.7; the current release is 7.1.3.
  • 1 plugin is behind its latest release.contact-form-7 6.1.7 → 6.2.3

Stack

CMS
WordPress 7.0.7
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Matomo
Hosting
Telecom - Orange

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 44 issues on ccas.fr, including 14 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25