Website review, no card needed

ccjk.com logo

ccjk.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202638 issues · 102 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on ccjk.com, 9 of them high impact, across 102 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.4 s3.0 sMay 9Oct 243.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.0 s
May 16, 20263.1 s
May 23, 20263.3 s
May 30, 20263.3 s
Jun 6, 20263.2 s
Jun 13, 20263.3 s
Jun 20, 20263.2 s
Jun 27, 20263.3 s
Jul 4, 20263.3 s
Jul 11, 20263.2 s
Jul 18, 20263.1 s
Jul 25, 20263.2 s
Aug 1, 20263.2 s
Aug 8, 20263.1 s
Aug 15, 20263.2 s
Aug 22, 20263.1 s
Aug 29, 20263.1 s
Sep 5, 20263.1 s
Sep 12, 20263.1 s
Sep 19, 20263.2 s
Sep 26, 20263.3 s
Oct 3, 20263.3 s
Oct 10, 20263.3 s
Oct 17, 20263.3 s
Oct 24, 20263.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
158 ms139 msMay 9Oct 24149 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026145 ms
May 16, 2026147 ms
May 23, 2026150 ms
May 30, 2026153 ms
Jun 6, 2026143 ms
Jun 13, 2026141 ms
Jun 20, 2026141 ms
Jun 27, 2026142 ms
Jul 4, 2026150 ms
Jul 11, 2026149 ms
Jul 18, 2026149 ms
Jul 25, 2026149 ms
Aug 1, 2026147 ms
Aug 8, 2026143 ms
Aug 15, 2026146 ms
Aug 22, 2026152 ms
Aug 29, 2026156 ms
Sep 5, 2026154 ms
Sep 12, 2026152 ms
Sep 19, 2026147 ms
Sep 26, 2026146 ms
Oct 3, 2026147 ms
Oct 10, 2026152 ms
Oct 17, 2026149 ms
Oct 24, 2026149 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of ccjk.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. ccjk.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. ccjk.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. ccjk.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. ccjk.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. ccjk.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. ccjk.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. ccjk.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. ccjk.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

ccjk.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

6 to fix95
  • Render-blocking requests

    650 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 650 ms.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 21 KiB

    About 21 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    279 KiB

    About 279 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 210 ms

    210 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 210 ms of main-thread work and 315 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,924 HTML elements

    The page has 1,924 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • tidio.co adds 68 ms

    68 ms

    tidio.co costs a phone 68 ms of main-thread work and 515 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, tidio.co and Clarity and others), adding 882 KiB and 348 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 54 KiB

    4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (54 KiB).

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 159 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Improve image delivery

    4 KiB

    1 image could be 4 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

3 checks passed
  • Mobile performance score: 95

    95/100

    Your mobile performance score is 95 (desktop: 88). That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).

  • Main-thread work: 1.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 693 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 77 ms

    77 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 77 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 8.2 s

    8.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 8.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors wait 3.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.16

    0.16

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.16 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 4.0 s

    4.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 145 ms to 149 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 149 ms

    149 ms

    Real visitors wait 149 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Your largest element renders in 2.5 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Managed AI Translation Services”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 72 ms

    72 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 72 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix68
  • Page weight: 3.8 MB in 85 requests

    3.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.8 MB in 85 requests on a phone: images 2.8 MB (52), scripts 830 KiB (16) and fonts 135 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (857 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    63 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example home_banner_bg.webp at 3,840 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 63 KiB.

  • About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.09 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.09 g of CO₂e: 130.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 8086
  • 4 buttons without a name

    4 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 87 text elements with low contrast

    87 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Form elements should have a visible label (4 elements)

    Form elements should have a visible label: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Links must have discernible text (1 element)

    Links must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 7 form fields without a label

    7 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (4 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (4 elements)

    Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h5, h2 → h6 and h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 9 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 6989
  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, Organization, Product and WebPage) but with 1 problem, for example “Product: no offers (price) block”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 6 links crawlers can't follow

    6 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 6 links with vague text

    6 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 130 internal links, 10 external

    The homepage links to 130 pages on ccjk.com and 10 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 147 characters

    Your meta description is 147 characters: “Best translation company for documents, software, websites, video games, medical and more. Get professional translation…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Managed AI Translation Services”.

  • Title: 48 characters

    Your title is a healthy 48 characters: “Professional Translation Services Company | CCJK”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.ccjk.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.ccjk.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • Parts of the site are closed to 4 AI crawlers

    Your robots.txt lets ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude (Claude-User) and Perplexity (PerplexityBot) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.

3 checks passed
  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,864 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (13 KiB, 31 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 69 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9285
  • 5 small tap targets

    5 of 7 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix94
  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (ccjk.com).

  • Valid certificate (76 days left)

    The certificate from Amazon · Amazon RSA 2048 M04 verifies for ccjk.com and is valid for another 76 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://ccjk.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 47 links work

    All 47 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 7 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    ccjk.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    ccjk.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 24 years old

    24 years

    ccjk.com was registered in Mar 2002 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Mar 2032

    ccjk.com is registered until Mar 2032.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • A 8-field form

    Your longest form asks for 8 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,618 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,618 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Start My Free Pilot”.

  • 15 calls to action

    The homepage has 15 calls to action, for example “Start My Free Pilot”, “Get free quote” and “Contact Us”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 testimonial or review blocks, 47 customer or partner logos, a star rating and 7 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

Email authentication

2 to fix60
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be ccjk.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.

  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Email authentication score: 60/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

1 checks passed
  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.abchk.net ~all”.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 21 cookies set on arrival

    21

    Opening the homepage sets 21 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 10 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • It runs WordPress 3.7.1; the current release is 7.1.3.

Stack

CMS
WordPress 3.7.1
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
AWS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on ccjk.com, including 13 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25