Website review, no card needed

ccmuseum.com logo

ccmuseum.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202648 issues · 108 checks

This review found 48 issues worth fixing on ccmuseum.com, 17 of them high impact, across 108 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.2 s1.7 sMay 16Oct 312.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.0 s
May 23, 20262.0 s
May 30, 20262.0 s
Jun 6, 20262.0 s
Jun 13, 20262.0 s
Jun 20, 20261.9 s
Jun 27, 20261.9 s
Jul 4, 20262.0 s
Jul 11, 20262.0 s
Jul 18, 20262.0 s
Jul 25, 20262.1 s
Aug 1, 20262.1 s
Aug 8, 20262.0 s
Aug 15, 20262.0 s
Aug 22, 20261.9 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.8 s
Sep 12, 20261.9 s
Sep 19, 20261.9 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20262.0 s
Oct 24, 20262.1 s
Oct 31, 20262.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
134 ms100 msMay 16Oct 31130 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026108 ms
May 23, 2026113 ms
May 30, 2026111 ms
Jun 6, 2026107 ms
Jun 13, 2026108 ms
Jun 20, 2026105 ms
Jun 27, 2026108 ms
Jul 4, 2026110 ms
Jul 11, 2026111 ms
Jul 18, 2026111 ms
Jul 25, 2026110 ms
Aug 1, 2026109 ms
Aug 8, 2026109 ms
Aug 15, 2026105 ms
Aug 22, 2026111 ms
Aug 29, 2026113 ms
Sep 5, 2026106 ms
Sep 12, 2026106 ms
Sep 19, 2026108 ms
Sep 26, 2026104 ms
Oct 3, 2026108 ms
Oct 10, 2026112 ms
Oct 17, 2026128 ms
Oct 24, 2026130 ms
Oct 31, 2026130 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

9 to fix49
  • Render-blocking requests

    3.9 s

    38 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.9 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.2 s · 448 KiB

    About 448 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.1 s · 198 KiB

    5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (198 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.0 s · 119 KiB

    About 119 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 49

    49/100

    Your mobile performance score is 49. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and TVSquared and others), adding 925 KiB and 546 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 355 ms

    355 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 355 ms of main-thread work and 536 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 29 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 29 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 2.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Minify CSS

    130 ms · 13 KiB

    13 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • 10 long tasks on the main thread

    10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 108 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Improve image delivery

    37 KiB

    1 image could be 37 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 61 ms

    61 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 61 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 13.5 s

    13.5 s

    Your largest element takes 13.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Corpus Christi Museum of Science and History”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.9 s

    5.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 13.6 s

    13.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 13.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.7 s

    8.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Real visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.25

    0.25

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.25 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.137

    0.137

    The layout shifts by 0.137 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 18% slower for real visitors

    +18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 108 ms to 130 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 163 ms

    163 ms

    Real visitors wait 163 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 611 ms

    611 ms

    Real visitors wait 611 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 177 ms

    177 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 177 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix75
  • Page weight: 2.1 MB in 143 requests

    2.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.1 MB in 143 requests on a phone: scripts 1.2 MB (55), fonts 399 KiB (11) and stylesheets 272 KiB (64). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    154 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example BZ-6704-scaled.webp at 2,560 px wide, shown at 330 px. Resized copies would save about 154 KiB.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (181 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.59 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.59 g of CO₂e: 71.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 6786
  • 4 text elements with low contrast

    4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 9 images without alt text

    9 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (10 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

1 checks passed
  • 30 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 38 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 30 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 6975
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 3 links crawlers can't follow

    3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 44 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 44 pages on ccmuseum.com and 8 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Title: 51 characters

    Your title is a healthy 51 characters: “Home - Corpus Christi Museum of Science and History”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.ccmuseum.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.ccmuseum.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (28 KiB, 159 links, though it should open with a “# Title” line), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 14 pages without a meta description

    /visit, /museum-exhibits, /events, /education-programs, /education-programs/teachers-and-students and /education-programs/scouts and 8 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 5 pages without an H1

    /visit, /museum-exhibits, /education-programs, /membership and /support-your-museum have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 28 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    6 of 7 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

3 to fix71
  • 5 broken links to your own pages

    5 links from your homepage to your own site are broken, for example https://www.ccmuseum.com/?page_id=23757 (404).

  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example http://instagram.com/corpuschristimuseum.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

4 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (ccmuseum.com).

  • Valid certificate (73 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR1 verifies for ccmuseum.com and is valid for another 73 days.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://ccmuseum.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

1 to fix
  • Domain expires in 82 days

    ccmuseum.com is registered until Jan 2027. Make sure auto-renew is on and the card on file is current.

  • No CAA record

    ccmuseum.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    ccmuseum.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

1 checks passed
  • Domain is 23 years old

    23 years

    ccmuseum.com was registered in Jan 2003 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

Content and conversion

3 to fix75
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Only about 141 words

    The homepage has only about 141 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Buy Tickets” and “Subscribe”.

  • 11 calls to action

    The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Buy Tickets”, “Request Group Trip” and “Buy Tickets Now”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage.

Email authentication

2 to fix35
  • No DMARC policy

    ccmuseum.com has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.

  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Email authentication score: 35/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

1 checks passed
  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 exists:%{i}.spf.hc4332-1.iphmx.com include:amazonses.com include:eautofeedback.com include:spf.protection.outloo…”.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 9 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • 5 plugins are behind their latest release.header-footer-elementor 2.8.2 → 2.9.6 · elementor 3.34.3 → 4.3.6 · essential-addons-for-elementor-lite 6.5.9 → 6.8.8 · elementskit-lite 3.7.8 → 4.1.0 · mailchimp-top-bar 1.7.3 → 1.7.8

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
Liquid Web

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 48 issues on ccmuseum.com, including 18 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25