Website review, no card needed

cdr.com logo

cdr.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202628 issues · 93 checks

This review found 28 issues worth fixing on cdr.com, 11 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 22.7 MB in 14 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.0 s1.3 sMay 9Oct 241.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.6 s
May 16, 20261.7 s
May 23, 20261.5 s
May 30, 20261.6 s
Jun 6, 20261.7 s
Jun 13, 20261.8 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20261.9 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20261.7 s
Jul 18, 20261.7 s
Jul 25, 20261.6 s
Aug 1, 20261.6 s
Aug 8, 20261.6 s
Aug 15, 20261.5 s
Aug 22, 20261.6 s
Aug 29, 20261.5 s
Sep 5, 20261.4 s
Sep 12, 20261.4 s
Sep 19, 20261.4 s
Sep 26, 20261.4 s
Oct 3, 20261.5 s
Oct 10, 20261.5 s
Oct 17, 20261.6 s
Oct 24, 20261.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
105 ms78 msMay 9Oct 2486 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202696 ms
May 16, 202696 ms
May 23, 202695 ms
May 30, 202696 ms
Jun 6, 202697 ms
Jun 13, 202697 ms
Jun 20, 202697 ms
Jun 27, 2026102 ms
Jul 4, 202697 ms
Jul 11, 202694 ms
Jul 18, 202691 ms
Jul 25, 202690 ms
Aug 1, 202691 ms
Aug 8, 202693 ms
Aug 15, 202693 ms
Aug 22, 202686 ms
Aug 29, 202684 ms
Sep 5, 202681 ms
Sep 12, 202683 ms
Sep 19, 202685 ms
Sep 26, 202686 ms
Oct 3, 202687 ms
Oct 10, 202686 ms
Oct 17, 202684 ms
Oct 24, 202686 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of cdr.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. cdr.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. cdr.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. cdr.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. cdr.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. cdr.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. cdr.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. cdr.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. cdr.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

cdr.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

4 to fix72
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.9 s

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 1.9 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.2 s · 221 KiB

    About 221 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.1 s · 235 KiB

    About 235 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 72

    72/100

    Your mobile performance score is 72 (desktop: 98). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Font display

    150 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 113 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Document request latency

    59 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Improve image delivery

    30 KiB

    2 images could be 30 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 98 but mobile only 72. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    7 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (7 KiB).

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 261 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 12 ms

    12 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 12 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    Your largest element takes 4.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Building Businesses, Building Value”.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 6.0 s

    6.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 6.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 88 ms

    88 ms

    Real visitors wait 88 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 11% faster for real visitors

    -11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 96 ms to 86 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.01

    0.01

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.01, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 32 ms

    32 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 32 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 22.7 MB in 14 requests

    22.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 22.7 MB in 14 requests on a phone: media 21.3 MB (2), scripts 341 KiB (2) and fonts 340 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (61 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 6.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    6.43 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.43 g of CO₂e: 771.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9695
  • 6 text elements with low contrast

    6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 4 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 38 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 40 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 2 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9278
  • Title is long (109 characters)

    Your title is 109 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “CD&R | Building Businesses Building Value — Clayton Dubilier & Rice, LLC | Building Busin…”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 3 H1 headlines

    There are 3 <h1> headlines (“Building Businesses, Building Value”, “Menu” and “Menu”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 37 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 37 pages on cdr.com and 6 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 79 characters

    Your meta description is 79 characters: “We are a global investment firm that invests in and builds valuable businesses.”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.cdr.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (388 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix98
  • 7 pages share a meta description

    /cdr-foundation, /news/cd-and-r-and-mckesson-corporation-sign-agreement-to-acquire-option-care-health, /news/giovanni-caforio-appointed-operating-advisor-to-cd-and-r-funds, /news/cd-and-r-named-a-top-private-equity-firm-of-2026-by-growthcap, /news/john-chiminski-former-catalent-chair-and-ceo-to-serve-as-cd-and-r-operating-advisor and /privacy-and-terms-of-use and 1 other use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 5 pages slow to respond

    /team, /team/advisors, /portfolio, /firm/sustainability and /cdr-foundation took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 16 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Ignoring duplicate Content-Security-Policy directive 'frame-ancestors'.”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    10 of 11 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (cdr.com).

  • Valid certificate (46 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for cdr.com and is valid for another 46 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://cdr.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 21 links work

    All 21 links checked from your homepage (17 internal, 4 external) answered without errors; 1 did not answer within 5 s.

Domain and trust

1 to fix
  • Domain expires in 22 days

    cdr.com is registered until Nov 2026. If it lapses, the site and its email stop working and someone else can buy the name. Renew it, and turn on auto-renew.

  • No CAA record

    cdr.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    cdr.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

1 checks passed
  • Domain is 29 years old

    29 years

    cdr.com was registered in Nov 1996 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

Content and conversion

4 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 329 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 329 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

Email authentication

90
  • Email authentication score: 90/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:208.211.150.3 ip4:208.211.150.8 ip4:193.132.25.132 ip4:193.132.25.135 ip4:149.72.231.47 ip4:149.72.196.66 ip…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “selector2” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 28 issues on cdr.com, including 11 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25