Website review, no card needed
cerascreen.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202629 issues · 103 checks
This review found 29 issues worth fixing on cerascreen.com, 13 of them high impact, across 103 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
85B- #10,708 of 81,751 reviewed websitesbeats 83%
- #6,094 of 40,547 online storesbeats 80%
- #5,884 of 35,927 Shopify storesbeats 78%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 1.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 118 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 103 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.8 s
1.6 s
2.4 s
3.2 s
3.9 s
4.7 s
5.5 s
6.3 s
cerascreen.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Render-blocking requests
3.4 s3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.4 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.2 s · 400 KiBAbout 400 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 59
59/100Your mobile performance score is 59. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Shopify and Clarity and others), adding 1.6 MB and 689 ms of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
600 ms · 151 KiB16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (151 KiB).
Main-thread work: 3.7 s
A phone's processor spends 3.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Google Tag Manager adds 259 ms
259 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 259 ms of main-thread work and 298 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
264 KiB24 images could be 264 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Shopify adds 124 ms
124 msShopify costs a phone 124 ms of main-thread work and 853 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,075 HTML elements
The page has 2,075 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 190 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 8 KiB8 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Reduce unused CSS
61 KiBAbout 61 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Duplicated JavaScript
11 KiB11 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 71 ms
71 msYour server sent the HTML in 71 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 10.4 s
10.4 sYour largest element takes 10.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Wir verwenden Cookies, um dir das bestmögliche Erlebnis auf…”. Most of its time is element render delay (6.2 s).
Speed Index: 10.6 s
10.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 11.3 s
11.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 11.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.1 s
3.1 sThe first text or image appears after 3.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
9 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 127 ms
127 msReal visitors wait 127 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 418 ms
418 msReal visitors wait 418 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 13% faster for real visitors
-13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 118 ms to 103 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 149 ms
149 msScripts block the page for only 149 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.9 MB in 203 requests
2.9 MBYour homepage downloads 2.9 MB in 203 requests on a phone: scripts 1.1 MB (76), images 780 KiB (53) and other files 681 KiB (64). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit
0.81 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.81 g of CO₂e: 97.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
28 text elements with low contrast
28 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
4 tap targets too small
4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
[role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text (1 element)
[role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
6 images without alt text
6 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (74 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 74 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (5 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (9 elements).
1 checks passed
51 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Moderne Laboranalyse.Klarheit für deine Gesundhei…” and “Müde? Bauchbeschwerden?Finde heraus, was dahinter…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
293 internal links, 15 external
The homepage links to 293 pages on cerascreen.com and 15 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 140 characters
Your meta description is 140 characters: “Selbsttests für Zuhause (Mangelerscheinung, Allergie & Intoleranz erkennen) ✓ ausgewählte Nahrungsergänzungsmittel ✓ Ge…”.
Title: 41 characters
Your title is a healthy 41 characters: “Teste dich – gesund leben mit cerascreen®”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.cerascreen.de/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: FAQPage, OnlineStore and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.cerascreen.de/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,564 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
15 pages without an H1
/pages/versand-zahlung, /collections/testkits, /products/vitamin-d-test, /products/omega-3-test, /products/aminosaeuren-test and /products/cortisol-test and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
14 pages with very little text
/pages/versand-zahlung, /products/vitamin-d-test, /products/omega-3-test, /products/aminosaeuren-test, /products/cortisol-test and /products/histamin-intoleranz-test and 8 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 83 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
38 of 41 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
Short HSTS lifetime
HSTS is set, but max-age is 91 days; one year is the recommended minimum.
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (cerascreen.de).
Valid certificate (45 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for cerascreen.com and is valid for another 45 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
http:// redirects to https
http://cerascreen.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 52 links work
All 52 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 12 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
1 checks passed
Certificate issuers are restricted
CAA records allow only ssl.com, digicert.com, globalsign.com and letsencrypt.org to issue certificates for cerascreen.de, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 702 words of copy
The homepage carries about 702 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
8 short forms
8 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 7 testimonial or review blocks, 12 customer or partner logos, a star rating and 3 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be cerascreen.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.
Email authentication score: 75/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:_spf.google.com -all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “s1”, “s2” and “mandrill”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Usercentrics) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
10 cookies set on arrival
10Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
34 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 34 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Usercentrics
A consent management tool (Usercentrics) loads with the page.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 7 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
None of the apps your storefront loads is on the list of apps with a known security problem.
Apps your storefront loads
Pixelpro Easy Pixel Install · Microsoft Clarity · Tiktok Pixel For Adtrace · Reviews Co Uk Product And Merchant Review Collection · Essential Pre Order Presale · cloudfront.net · trustpilot.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 29 issues on cerascreen.com, including 14 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.