Website review, no card needed

checkwriters.com logo

checkwriters.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202642 issues · 103 checks

This review found 42 issues worth fixing on checkwriters.com, 18 of them high impact, across 103 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
8.1 s944 msMay 2Oct 171.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.2 s
May 9, 20262.2 s
May 16, 20262.2 s
May 23, 20262.2 s
May 30, 20262.2 s
Jun 6, 20262.2 s
Jun 13, 20262.3 s
Jun 20, 20262.3 s
Jun 27, 20262.9 s
Jul 4, 20264.3 s
Jul 11, 20265.5 s
Jul 18, 20266.8 s
Jul 25, 20267.2 s
Aug 1, 20267.3 s
Aug 8, 20267.0 s
Aug 15, 20265.9 s
Aug 22, 20264.6 s
Aug 29, 20263.0 s
Sep 5, 20261.8 s
Sep 12, 20261.9 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20261.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
140 ms114 msMay 2Oct 17117 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026121 ms
May 9, 2026120 ms
May 16, 2026122 ms
May 23, 2026121 ms
May 30, 2026122 ms
Jun 6, 2026133 ms
Jun 13, 2026136 ms
Jun 20, 2026137 ms
Jun 27, 2026136 ms
Jul 4, 2026126 ms
Jul 11, 2026125 ms
Jul 18, 2026123 ms
Jul 25, 2026129 ms
Aug 1, 2026130 ms
Aug 8, 2026128 ms
Aug 15, 2026123 ms
Aug 22, 2026120 ms
Aug 29, 2026120 ms
Sep 5, 2026124 ms
Sep 12, 2026126 ms
Sep 19, 2026128 ms
Sep 26, 2026124 ms
Oct 3, 2026119 ms
Oct 10, 2026121 ms
Oct 17, 2026117 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

11 to fix36
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    10.6 s · 2.3 MB

    About 2.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 10.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.3 s

    17 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.1 s · 848 KiB

    3 images could be 848 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.6 s · 288 KiB

    About 288 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

  • YouTube adds 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    YouTube costs a phone 1.2 s of main-thread work and 2.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 36

    36/100

    Your mobile performance score is 36 (desktop: 70). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, wirewax.com and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 4.4 MB and 1.9 s of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    800 ms · 853 KiB

    13 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (853 KiB).

  • wirewax.com adds 478 ms

    478 ms

    wirewax.com costs a phone 478 ms of main-thread work and 835 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 19 long tasks on the main thread

    19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 342 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 70 but mobile only 36. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Minify CSS

    10 KiB

    10 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 16 ms

    16 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 16 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 16.8 s

    16.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 16.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 24.1 s

    24.1 s

    Your largest element takes 24.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Five-Star Service. FIRST-CLASS PAYROLL.”.

  • Speed Index: 16.8 s

    16.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 16.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 35.8 s

    35.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 35.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 801 ms

    801 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 801 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 121 ms to 117 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 144 ms

    144 ms

    Real visitors wait 144 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 635 ms

    635 ms

    Real visitors wait 635 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 16% faster for real visitors

    -16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002

    0.002

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 6.0 MB in 186 requests

    6.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.0 MB in 186 requests on a phone: scripts 3.8 MB (34), images 1.2 MB (16) and stylesheets 416 KiB (92). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    Screenshot-2025-11-03-at-18.46.42-2.jpg weighs 714 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    566 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Screenshot-2025-11-03-at-18.46.42-2.jpg at 2,486 px wide, shown at 468 px. Resized copies would save about 566 KiB.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (757 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (757 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.71 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.71 g of CO₂e: 205.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

1 to fixGoogle 9599
  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 20 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 37 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 38 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 1 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 8574
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is long (67 characters)

    Your title is 67 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Checkwriters – Payroll and HR that Elevates the Customer Experience”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 72 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 72 pages on checkwriters.com and 6 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Five-Star Service.First-Class Payroll.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.checkwriters.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.checkwriters.com/wp-sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (659 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix78
  • 2 pages share a title

    /platform-overview.html and /applicant-tracking-background-screening.html all use the title “Applicant Tracking & Background Screening – Checkwriters”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 11 pages without a meta description

    /contact, /app.html, /platform-overview.html, /applicant-tracking-background-screening.html, /onboarding.html and /payroll.html and 5 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 5 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 5 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /app.html, whose canonical is /app. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    /platform-overview.html, /our-integrations and /about-us have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    /customer-success took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 50 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    11 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 11 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 7370
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.checkwriters.com/.

  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 3 small tap targets

    3 of 9 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix86
  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • 4 links through redirect chains

    4 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://checkwriters.com/performance-reviews-management.html.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

5 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (checkwriters.com).

  • Valid certificate (75 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for checkwriters.com and is valid for another 75 days.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://checkwriters.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 46 links work

    All 46 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 6 external) answered without errors; 16 did not answer within 5 s.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    checkwriters.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    checkwriters.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 30 years old

    30 years

    checkwriters.com was registered in Sep 1996 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Sep 2028

    checkwriters.com is registered until Sep 2028.

Content and conversion

100
  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 572 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 572 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact” and “Request Meeting”.

  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Watch our interactive software demo!” and “Request Meeting”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 6 testimonial or review blocks and 2 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and HubSpot.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 0 email links.

Email authentication

85
  • Email authentication score: 85/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 ip4:50.239.235.49 ip4:162.255.117.70 include:usb._netblocks.mimecast.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:651389…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “k1” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 27 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 27 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 42 issues on checkwriters.com, including 19 speed issues and 5 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25