Website review, no card needed

chocolatechocolate.com logo

chocolatechocolate.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202630 issues · 79 checks

This review found 30 issues worth fixing on chocolatechocolate.com, 9 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.8 s1.3 sMay 23Nov 71.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20261.6 s
May 30, 20261.6 s
Jun 6, 20261.6 s
Jun 13, 20261.7 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20261.7 s
Jul 4, 20261.7 s
Jul 11, 20261.6 s
Jul 18, 20261.5 s
Jul 25, 20261.5 s
Aug 1, 20261.4 s
Aug 8, 20261.3 s
Aug 15, 20261.4 s
Aug 22, 20261.4 s
Aug 29, 20261.4 s
Sep 5, 20261.4 s
Sep 12, 20261.4 s
Sep 19, 20261.4 s
Sep 26, 20261.4 s
Oct 3, 20261.4 s
Oct 10, 20261.4 s
Oct 17, 20261.4 s
Oct 24, 20261.4 s
Oct 31, 20261.4 s
Nov 7, 20261.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
125 ms96 msMay 23Nov 7108 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 202699 ms
May 30, 2026106 ms
Jun 6, 2026113 ms
Jun 13, 2026112 ms
Jun 20, 2026113 ms
Jun 27, 2026111 ms
Jul 4, 2026112 ms
Jul 11, 2026119 ms
Jul 18, 2026120 ms
Jul 25, 2026121 ms
Aug 1, 2026120 ms
Aug 8, 2026117 ms
Aug 15, 2026122 ms
Aug 22, 2026121 ms
Aug 29, 2026120 ms
Sep 5, 2026119 ms
Sep 12, 2026112 ms
Sep 19, 2026111 ms
Sep 26, 2026111 ms
Oct 3, 2026111 ms
Oct 10, 2026106 ms
Oct 17, 2026105 ms
Oct 24, 2026107 ms
Oct 31, 2026105 ms
Nov 7, 2026108 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of chocolatechocolate.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. chocolatechocolate.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. chocolatechocolate.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  3. chocolatechocolate.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  4. chocolatechocolate.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  5. chocolatechocolate.com at 3.8 s3.8 s
  6. chocolatechocolate.com at 4.5 s4.5 s
  7. chocolatechocolate.com at 5.3 s5.3 s
  8. chocolatechocolate.com at 6.0 s6.0 s

Speed

8 to fix63
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.3 s · 414 KiB

    About 414 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.6 s · 374 KiB

    13 images could be 374 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 63

    63/100

    Your mobile performance score is 63. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, cloudfront.net and qikify.com and others), adding 1.5 MB and 543 ms of main-thread time.

  • Shopify adds 401 ms

    401 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 401 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    500 ms

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 500 ms.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    300 ms · 73 KiB

    12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (73 KiB).

  • Main-thread work: 2.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 971 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 87 KiB

    About 87 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 145 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    50 ms · 8 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 8 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 50 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 6 ms

    6 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 21.2 s

    21.2 s

    Your largest element takes 21.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 21.2 s

    21.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 21.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.4 s

    7.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 28 images without width and height

    28 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 99 ms to 108 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 99 ms

    99 ms

    Real visitors wait 99 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 489 ms

    489 ms

    Real visitors wait 489 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 119 ms

    119 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 119 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.006

    0.006

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.006, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 3.5 MB in 299 requests

    3.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.5 MB in 299 requests on a phone: scripts 1.5 MB (147), images 963 KiB (24) and other files 838 KiB (106). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (60 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.00 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.00 g of CO₂e: 120.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 8492
  • ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (1 element)

    ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Hidden but focusable

    5 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 44 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10084
  • Title is long (108 characters)

    Your title is 108 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Handcrafted Artisan Chocolates - Truffles, Caramels & Chocolate Bars – Chocolate Chocolat…”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (203 characters)

    Your meta description is 203 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 92 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 92 pages on chocolatechocolate.com and 9 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Chocolate Chocolate Chocolate Company”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.chocolatechocolate.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.chocolatechocolate.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (585 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.chocolatechocolate.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 9 pages without a meta description

    https://www.chocolatechocolate.com/collections/fall-collection, https://www.chocolatechocolate.com/collections/frontpage, https://www.chocolatechocolate.com/collections/gift-ideas, https://www.chocolatechocolate.com/collections/caramel, https://www.chocolatechocolate.com/collections/dark-chocolate and https://www.chocolatechocolate.com/collections/milk-chocolate and 3 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.chocolatechocolate.com/collections/gift-ideas has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 34 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9684
  • 5 broken images

    5 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.chocolatechocolate.com/.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    18 of 22 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix75
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 4 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 361 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 361 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “THE FALL SHOP IS OPEN! [ SHOP NOW ]” and “SHOP NOW”.

  • 19 calls to action

    The homepage has 19 calls to action, for example “Shop Chocolates”, “Contact Us” and “The Fall Shop is OPEN! [ SHOP NOW ]”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Microsoft Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 21 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 21 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at chocolatechocolate.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 11 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Consentmo Gdpr · Inbox · Giftship · Judge Me Reviews · Gdpr Backpack · Https Appointly Com · Smart Menu · smile.io · trafficmanager.net · chimpstatic.com · cloudfront.net

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Shopify

Company

Headquarters
Saint Louis

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 30 issues on chocolatechocolate.com, including 13 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25
chocolatechocolate.com website review: scores and fixes