Website review, no card needed

cielodaily.com logo

cielodaily.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 November 202629 issues · 74 checks

This review found 29 issues worth fixing on cielodaily.com, 12 of them high impact, across 74 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.0 s2.6 sMay 23Oct 172.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20263.0 s
May 30, 20262.7 s
Jun 6, 20262.8 s
Jun 13, 20262.8 s
Jun 20, 20262.8 s
Jun 27, 20262.8 s
Jul 4, 20262.8 s
Jul 11, 20262.8 s
Jul 18, 20262.8 s
Jul 25, 20262.8 s
Aug 1, 20262.8 s
Aug 8, 20262.8 s
Aug 15, 20262.8 s
Aug 22, 20262.8 s
Aug 29, 20262.7 s
Sep 5, 20262.6 s
Sep 12, 20262.6 s
Sep 19, 20262.7 s
Sep 26, 20262.7 s
Oct 3, 20262.7 s
Oct 10, 20262.7 s
Oct 17, 20262.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
115 ms90 msMay 23Oct 1099 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 202696 ms
May 30, 202695 ms
Jun 6, 202698 ms
Jun 13, 2026104 ms
Jun 20, 2026106 ms
Jun 27, 2026106 ms
Jul 4, 2026112 ms
Jul 11, 2026104 ms
Jul 18, 2026101 ms
Jul 25, 2026100 ms
Aug 1, 2026101 ms
Aug 8, 2026103 ms
Aug 15, 2026104 ms
Aug 22, 2026108 ms
Aug 29, 2026103 ms
Sep 5, 2026100 ms
Sep 12, 202695 ms
Sep 19, 202693 ms
Sep 26, 202694 ms
Oct 3, 202695 ms
Oct 10, 202699 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of cielodaily.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. cielodaily.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. cielodaily.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. cielodaily.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. cielodaily.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. cielodaily.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. cielodaily.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. cielodaily.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. cielodaily.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

10 to fix57
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    4.0 s · 929 KiB

    23 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (929 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.8 s · 485 KiB

    About 485 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.2 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.2 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 57

    57/100

    Your mobile performance score is 57. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Improve image delivery

    500 ms · 337 KiB

    5 images could be 337 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Hotjar, Attentive and Shopify and others), adding 1.8 MB and 610 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    630 ms · 56 KiB

    About 56 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 630 ms faster on a phone.

  • Hotjar adds 279 ms

    279 ms

    Hotjar costs a phone 279 ms of main-thread work and 280 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Attentive adds 85 ms

    85 ms

    Attentive costs a phone 85 ms of main-thread work and 980 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 19 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    150 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 119 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 6 ms

    6 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix66
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 22.0 s

    22.0 s

    Your largest element takes 22.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “health should free you Daily foundations that simplify your…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 22.2 s

    22.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 22.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.8 s

    4.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.2 s

    9.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 96 ms to 99 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

2 checks passed
  • Total Blocking Time: 91 ms

    91 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 91 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 8.8 MB in 267 requests

    8.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 8.8 MB in 267 requests on a phone: media 4.7 MB (1), images 1.3 MB (12) and scripts 1.3 MB (87). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 2.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.50 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.50 g of CO₂e: 300.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 10095
  • Links must have discernible text (1 element)

    Links must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 5 images without alt text

    5 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 3 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9274
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is long (84 characters)

    Your title is 84 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Cielo | Science-backed supplements designed to bridge nutritional gaps – Cielo Daily”.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: logo is not an absolute URL ("https:files/Cielo-Logo_Dusk_2025-New.png")”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 38 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 38 pages on cielodaily.com and 4 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 159 characters

    Your meta description is 159 characters: “Transform your daily health and wellness with three targeted formulations: the multivitamin, the inflammatory health su…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://cielodaily.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://cielodaily.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://cielodaily.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (660 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix93
  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://cielodaily.com/pages/manufacturing and https://cielodaily.com/pages/ingredients-center use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 4 pages without an H1

    https://cielodaily.com/collections/all, https://cielodaily.com/pages/about, https://cielodaily.com/pages/manufacturing and https://cielodaily.com/pages/ingredients-center have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 14 internal pages checked

    We fetched 14 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    4 pages of 14 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 4 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 4 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    10 of 11 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 602 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 602 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop Now”.

  • 9 calls to action

    The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “Shop Now” and “Learn More”.

  • 6 short forms

    6 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Hotjar.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Hotjar and Klaviyo (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 22 cookies set on arrival

    22

    Opening the homepage sets 22 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 33 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 33 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at cielodaily.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 13 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Consentmo Gdpr · Powerful Form Builder · Reelup Shoppable Videos Reels · Mntn · Attentive · Yotpo Product Reviews · Gdpr Backpack · Restockrocket · rechargecdn.com · klaviyo.com · attn.tv · shareasale.com · hextom.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Hotjar
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 29 issues on cielodaily.com, including 14 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25