Website review, no card needed

citigroup.com logo

citigroup.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202637 issues · 99 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on citigroup.com, 11 of them high impact, across 99 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.6 s2.7 sMay 9Oct 243.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.8 s
May 16, 20262.8 s
May 23, 20262.8 s
May 30, 20262.8 s
Jun 6, 20262.9 s
Jun 13, 20262.9 s
Jun 20, 20262.9 s
Jun 27, 20262.9 s
Jul 4, 20262.9 s
Jul 11, 20263.0 s
Jul 18, 20262.9 s
Jul 25, 20263.0 s
Aug 1, 20263.0 s
Aug 8, 20263.0 s
Aug 15, 20263.1 s
Aug 22, 20263.1 s
Aug 29, 20263.1 s
Sep 5, 20263.2 s
Sep 12, 20263.2 s
Sep 19, 20263.3 s
Sep 26, 20263.4 s
Oct 3, 20263.5 s
Oct 10, 20263.4 s
Oct 17, 20263.4 s
Oct 24, 20263.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
259 ms222 msMay 9Oct 24255 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026230 ms
May 16, 2026228 ms
May 23, 2026226 ms
May 30, 2026228 ms
Jun 6, 2026228 ms
Jun 13, 2026230 ms
Jun 20, 2026234 ms
Jun 27, 2026239 ms
Jul 4, 2026246 ms
Jul 11, 2026250 ms
Jul 18, 2026241 ms
Jul 25, 2026238 ms
Aug 1, 2026236 ms
Aug 8, 2026234 ms
Aug 15, 2026238 ms
Aug 22, 2026240 ms
Aug 29, 2026245 ms
Sep 5, 2026252 ms
Sep 12, 2026253 ms
Sep 19, 2026254 ms
Sep 26, 2026250 ms
Oct 3, 2026247 ms
Oct 10, 2026253 ms
Oct 17, 2026253 ms
Oct 24, 2026255 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of citigroup.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. citigroup.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. citigroup.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  3. citigroup.com at 3.1 s3.1 s
  4. citigroup.com at 4.1 s4.1 s
  5. citigroup.com at 5.2 s5.2 s
  6. citigroup.com at 6.2 s6.2 s
  7. citigroup.com at 7.3 s7.3 s
  8. citigroup.com at 8.3 s8.3 s

citigroup.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

10 to fix44
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.9 s

    23 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 44

    44/100

    Your mobile performance score is 44 (desktop: 58). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    600 ms · 591 KiB

    25 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (591 KiB).

  • Document request latency

    900 ms

    The HTML itself could arrive about 900 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Reduce initial server response time

    895 ms

    Reduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 895 ms on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 668 KiB

    About 668 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 79 KiB

    About 79 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 13 long tasks on the main thread

    13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 359 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 3.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Server response: 995 ms

    995 ms

    Your server takes 995 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 183 KiB

    3 images could be 183 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    200 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 200 ms).

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Facebook, Adobe Tag Manager and Twitter Online Conversion Tracking and others), adding 261 KiB and 167 ms of main-thread time.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    53 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 53 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 17.5 s

    17.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 17.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 11.6 s

    11.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.0 s

    7.0 s

    Your largest element takes 7.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors wait 3.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 253 ms

    253 ms

    Real visitors wait 253 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 566 ms

    566 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 566 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 5 images without width and height

    5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 230 ms to 255 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 18% slower for real visitors

    +18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.03

    0.03

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.025

    0.025

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.025, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix60
  • 1 image over 500 KB

    6adb72dd039bc8fffded6fbc.jpg weighs 515 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • Page weight: 2.7 MB in 107 requests

    2.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.7 MB in 107 requests on a phone: scripts 1.4 MB (26), images 551 KiB (36) and HTML 489 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    252 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 6adb72dd039bc8fffded6fbc.jpg at 1,248 px wide, shown at 351 px. Resized copies would save about 252 KiB.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.77 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.77 g of CO₂e: 92.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9797
  • Positive tabindex

    1 element has a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (36 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 36 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 8 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10097
  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 20 internal links, 0 external

    The homepage links to 20 pages on citigroup.com and 0 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 136 characters

    Your meta description is 136 characters: “Citi is a leading global bank for institutions with cross-border needs, a global provider in wealth management and a U.…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Citigroup.com Homepage”.

  • Title: 52 characters

    Your title is a healthy 52 characters: “Citi | Global Investment Bank and Financial Services”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.citigroup.com/global.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.citigroup.com/global/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix75
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    27%

    A phone browser shows 490 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 132. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

Other pages

2 to fix93
  • 8 pages share a meta description

    /global/investors/quarterly-earnings, /global/investors/sec-filings and /global/investors/corporate-governance use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    /global/about-us and /global/businesses/services have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 3 pages with very little text

    /global/businesses, /global/news/article/2026/third-quarter-2026-earnings-call and /global/investors/sec-filings have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 13 internal pages checked

    We fetched 13 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 13 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 13 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Minified React error #418; visit https://reactjs.org/docs/error-decoder.html?invariant=418 for the full message or use …”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    17 of 18 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • 3 redirects before the homepage

    Opening https://citigroup.com goes through 3 redirects before the homepage loads.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (citigroup.com).

  • Valid certificate (92 days left)

    The certificate from DigiCert Inc · DigiCert EV RSA CA G2 verifies for citigroup.com and is valid for another 92 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://citigroup.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 19 links work

    All 19 links checked from your homepage (19 internal, 0 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • DNSSEC is off

    citigroup.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 28 years old

    28 years

    citigroup.com was registered in Apr 1998 through CSC Corporate Domains, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Certificate issuers are restricted

    CAA records allow only digicert.com, globalsign.com and to issue certificates for citigroup.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.

  • Registered until Apr 2032

    citigroup.com is registered until Apr 2032.

Content and conversion

4 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 490 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 490 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Learn more about Citi”.

Email authentication

2 to fix75
  • SPF does not block other senders (no all)

    Your SPF record doesn't end in -all or ~all, so it doesn't stop other servers sending as you: “v=spf1 a:1._spf.citigroup.com a:2._spf.citigroup.com include:spf-00123c01.pphosted.com redirect=ext1._spf.citigroup.com”.

  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Email authentication score: 75/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

1 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads LinkedIn Insight, Meta Pixel and X (Twitter) Ads (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 20 cookies set on arrival

    20

    Opening the homepage sets 20 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Hosting
Akamai

Company

Employees
219,000
Founded
1812
Headquarters
388 Greenwich Street

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on citigroup.com, including 21 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25