Website review, no card needed
clae.eu website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202623 issues · 68 checks
This review found 23 issues worth fixing on clae.eu, 7 of them high impact, across 68 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 20.2 MB in 385 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
80B- #34,702 of 88,976 reviewed websitesbeats 55%
- #21,448 of 46,343 online storesbeats 47%
- #20,488 of 41,597 Shopify storesbeats 44%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 1.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 112 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 142 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Main-thread work: 5.0 s
A phone's processor spends 5.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 923 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 63
63/100Your mobile performance score is 63. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
620 ms · 183 KiBAbout 183 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 620 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
600 ms4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 600 ms.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
500 ms · 97 KiB16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (97 KiB).
2,548 HTML elements
The page has 2,548 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Klaviyo, Hotjar and Shopify and others), adding 919 KiB and 421 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 32 KiBAbout 32 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
173 KiB5 images could be 173 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 19 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
1 long task on the main thread
1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 68 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 52 ms
52 msYour server sent the HTML in 52 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 11.1 s
11.1 sYour largest element takes 11.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 11.2 s
11.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 11.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.1 s
7.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Tap response (INP) got 28% slower for real visitors
+28%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 112 ms to 142 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s
2.9 sThe first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 122 ms
122 msReal visitors wait 122 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 504 ms
504 msReal visitors wait 504 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 18 ms
18 msScripts block the page for only 18 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 20.2 MB in 385 requests
20.2 MBYour homepage downloads 20.2 MB in 385 requests on a phone: media 16.9 MB (3), other files 1.4 MB (255) and scripts 968 KiB (81). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 5.7 g of CO₂ per visit
5.73 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.73 g of CO₂e: 687.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
4 tap targets too small
4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Links do not have a discernible name
Links do not have a discernible name (2 elements).
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).
SEO
Title is short (13 characters)
Your title is only 13 characters: “CLAE Footwear”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
229 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 229 pages on clae.eu and 8 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 101 characters
Your meta description is 101 characters: “Shop modern silhouettes that emphasize uncommon comfort and versatility for today's active lifestyle.”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “CLAE Footwear”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://clae.eu/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://clae.eu/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
/collections/accessories has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
4 pages without an H1
/collections/shoes, /blogs/journal/clae-x-union-los-angeles, /collections/sale and /collections/sneakers have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 82 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 console errors
5 errors were logged to the browser console during Google's test (“Access to fetch at 'https://wisepops.net/id?h=qJqRsMN6ji&vid=&eid=' from origin 'https://clae.eu' h…”).
Requests the notification permission on page load
Requests the notification permission on page load.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,039 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,039 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
7 calls to action
The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Shop Essentials”, “What we make and howBranding Learn More” and “Learn More”.
8 short forms
8 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Hotjar.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at clae.eu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 11 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
T Lab Ai Translate · Oxi Social Login Wishlist · Wisepops Popup Builder Cro · Geoip Country Redirect · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Avada Seo Suite · Pushowl · Rivo Loyalty Rewards Referrals · Polar Analytics · Back In Stock · nfcube.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Bootstrap
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Hotjar
- Hosting
- Shopify
Company
- Headquarters
- Denver
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 23 issues on clae.eu, including 11 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.