Website review, no card needed
clo-la.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 13 November 202637 issues · 83 checks
This review found 37 issues worth fixing on clo-la.com, 11 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
81B- #37,061 of 109,278 reviewed websitesbeats 60%
- #24,689 of 61,834 online storesbeats 54%
- #23,827 of 56,393 Shopify storesbeats 51%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 1.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 103 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 121 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.8 s · 1.2 MBAbout 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 44
44/100Your mobile performance score is 44. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 7.9 s
A phone's processor spends 7.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (figr.so, Klaviyo and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 3.9 MB and 1.8 s of main-thread time.
figr.so adds 952 ms
952 msfigr.so costs a phone 952 ms of main-thread work and 2.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
7 long tasks on the main thread
7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 972 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Render-blocking requests
850 ms6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 850 ms.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
500 ms · 144 KiB12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (144 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 135 KiBAbout 135 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
481 KiB18 images could be 481 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Klaviyo adds 251 ms
251 msKlaviyo costs a phone 251 ms of main-thread work and 527 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Shopify adds 184 ms
184 msShopify costs a phone 184 ms of main-thread work and 550 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
1,602 HTML elements
The page has 1,602 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
LoyaltyLion adds 96 ms
96 msLoyaltyLion costs a phone 96 ms of main-thread work and 369 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
27 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 27 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify CSS
14 KiB14 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 6 ms
6 msYour server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 14.5 s
14.5 sYour largest element takes 14.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Raya Burgundy set with Icon Black bag on a cream sofa”.
Time to Interactive: 31.3 s
31.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 31.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.9 s
9.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 769 ms
769 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 769 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.5 s
2.5 sThe first text or image appears after 2.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 11% slower for real visitors
+11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 103 ms to 121 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.1 s to 1.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 127 ms
127 msReal visitors wait 127 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 533 ms
533 msReal visitors wait 533 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.5 MB in 526 requests
6.5 MBYour homepage downloads 6.5 MB in 526 requests on a phone: scripts 3.4 MB (212), other files 1.3 MB (254) and images 1.3 MB (31). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit
1.84 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.84 g of CO₂e: 220.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
35 text elements with low contrast
35 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
7 links without text
7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (2 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (1 element)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 137 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
102 internal links, 3 external
The homepage links to 102 pages on clo-la.com and 3 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 84 characters
Your meta description is 84 characters: “Handmade dresses created in limited drops. Designed with intention, crafted to last.”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “clo-la”.
Title: 40 characters
Your title is a healthy 40 characters: “clo-la | Handmade dresses, limited drops”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.clo-la.com/en-us.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.clo-la.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (541 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.clo-la.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
4 pages share 2 titles
https://www.clo-la.com/sv-sv/collections/all and https://www.clo-la.com/en-us/collections/all all use the title “Shop All – Every Dress, Set & Accessory | clo-la”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
4 pages share a meta description
https://www.clo-la.com/sv-sv/collections/all and https://www.clo-la.com/en-us/collections/all use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
4 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 4 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.clo-la.com/sv-sv/collections/all, whose canonical is https://www.clo-la.com/en-us/collections/all. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
15 pages without an H1
https://www.clo-la.com/sv-sv/collections/all, https://www.clo-la.com/sv-sv/collections/bags-1, https://www.clo-la.com/en-us/collections/all, https://www.clo-la.com/en-us/collections/new-in, https://www.clo-la.com/collections/most-loved-test and https://www.clo-la.com/en-us/collections/coming-soon and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 56 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
16 small tap targets
16 of 40 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 185 words
The homepage has only about 185 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Shop all”, “Join our list” and “Contact”.
7 short forms
7 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
19 cookies set on arrival
19Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
41 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 41 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at clo-la.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 6 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Loyalty Rewards And Referrals · Okendo · Gift Box · Restockrocket · amazonaws.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 37 issues on clo-la.com, including 19 speed issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.