Website review, no card needed
coatdefense.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202635 issues · 83 checks
This review found 35 issues worth fixing on coatdefense.com, 13 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
85B- #14,962 of 109,350 reviewed websitesbeats 82%
- #9,513 of 61,859 online storesbeats 79%
- #9,250 of 56,401 Shopify storesbeats 78%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 2.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 146 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 218 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.8 s
1.7 s
2.5 s
3.3 s
4.1 s
5.0 s
5.8 s
6.6 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.5 s · 646 KiBAbout 646 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.1 s · 258 KiB25 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (258 KiB).
Main-thread work: 5.9 s
A phone's processor spends 5.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 56
56/100Your mobile performance score is 56. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (alia-prod.com, Clarity and loox.io and others), adding 1.6 MB and 765 ms of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
450 ms · 465 KiB20 images could be 465 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
750 ms10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.
1,931 HTML elements
The page has 1,931 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
loox.io adds 126 ms
126 msloox.io costs a phone 126 ms of main-thread work and 479 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
LoyaltyLion adds 56 ms
56 msLoyaltyLion costs a phone 56 ms of main-thread work and 359 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
130 ms · 73 KiBAbout 73 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 130 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 29 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 29 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
7 long tasks on the main thread
7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 166 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify CSS
10 ms · 6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 9 ms
9 msYour server sent the HTML in 9 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 19.2 s
19.2 sYour largest element takes 19.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 21.9 s
21.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 21.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.2 s
10.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.4 s
4.4 sThe first text or image appears after 4.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 47% slower for real visitors
+47%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 146 ms to 218 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
3 images without width and height
3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) got 15% slower for real visitors
+15%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 154 ms
154 msReal visitors wait 154 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 797 ms
797 msReal visitors wait 797 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 140 ms
140 msScripts block the page for only 140 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.2 MB in 402 requests
4.2 MBYour homepage downloads 4.2 MB in 402 requests on a phone: scripts 1.8 MB (119), other files 1.1 MB (194) and images 963 KiB (50). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit
1.19 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.19 g of CO₂e: 143.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (1 element)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (3 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 84 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
54 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 54 passed and 4 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (12 characters)
Your title is only 12 characters: “Coat Defense”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Coat Defense” and “Naturally Fabulous for You and Your Animals”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
234 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 234 pages on coatdefense.com and 8 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 136 characters
Your meta description is 136 characters: “Providing effective solutions for skin and coat health that are safe for animals, the humans who care for them, and the…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://coatdefense.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://coatdefense.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no https://coatdefense.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,089 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a title
https://coatdefense.com/customer_authentication/redirect has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
1 linked page hidden from search
https://coatdefense.com/customer_authentication/redirect is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
1 page without a meta description
https://coatdefense.com/customer_authentication/redirect has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page without an H1
https://coatdefense.com/customer_authentication/redirect has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page slow to respond
https://coatdefense.com/customer_authentication/redirect took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 50 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
2 checks passed
Linked pages load
1 page of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://files.alia-prod.com/CDLogoFittoWebcropped410x884c208c035145668da7e25ce4b8c5ac.png-1736828301690.
17 small tap targets
17 of 70 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_CERT_AUTHORITY_INVALID”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
About 588 words of copy
The homepage carries about 588 words of visible text.
7 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop All”.
7 calls to action
The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Shop All Product”, “Shop All” and “Sign up”.
14 short forms
14 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 449 testimonial or review blocks, 40 customer or partner logos and a star rating.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Klaviyo, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
34 cookies set on arrival
34Opening the homepage sets 34 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
54 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 54 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at coatdefense.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 17 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Intelligems A B Testing · Mntn · Loyalty Rewards And Referrals · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Triplewhale · Microsoft Clarity · Hulk Form Builder · Stape Remix · Applovin Shop Integration · Upcart · hulkapps.com · stamped.io · nice-team.net · goaffpro.com · merchantyard.com · getredo.com · loox.io
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Bootstrap
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Company
- Headquarters
- Ashburn
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 35 issues on coatdefense.com, including 18 speed issues and 3 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.