Website review, no card needed
coconstruct.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202644 issues · 111 checks
This review found 44 issues worth fixing on coconstruct.com, 18 of them high impact, across 111 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 109 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 103 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 98 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 99 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 98 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.8 s
1.5 s
2.3 s
3.1 s
3.9 s
4.6 s
5.4 s
6.2 s
coconstruct.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.8 s · 3.3 MBAbout 3.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.3 s5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.5 s · 655 KiB32 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (655 KiB).
Google CDN adds 1.6 s
1.6 sGoogle CDN costs a phone 1.6 s of main-thread work and 2.6 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
YouTube adds 1.1 s
1.1 sYouTube costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 1.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 12.3 s
A phone's processor spends 12.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 8.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 26
26/100Your mobile performance score is 26 (desktop: 58). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, YouTube and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 6.4 MB and 4.4 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 169 KiBAbout 169 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 483 ms
483 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 483 ms of main-thread work and 361 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Hubspot adds 451 ms
451 msHubspot costs a phone 451 ms of main-thread work and 295 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 394 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
website-files.com adds 152 ms
152 mswebsite-files.com costs a phone 152 ms of main-thread work and 577 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 35 KiB2 images could be 35 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
29 KiB29 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Legacy JavaScript
21 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 58 but mobile only 26. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Time to Interactive: 45.8 s
45.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 45.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 3.2 s
3.2 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 3.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 6.2 s
6.2 sYour largest element takes 6.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “The next chapter starts with Buildertrend CoConstruct's tra…”.
Speed Index: 9.2 s
9.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.1 s
4.1 sThe first text or image appears after 4.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.153
0.153The layout shifts by 0.153 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
14 images without width and height
14 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 109 ms to 98 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 96 ms
96 msReal visitors wait 96 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 301 ms
301 msReal visitors wait 301 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 12% faster for real visitors
-12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 8.3 MB in 189 requests
8.3 MBYour homepage downloads 8.3 MB in 189 requests on a phone: scripts 5.5 MB (57), other files 1.1 MB (53) and images 536 KiB (41). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 2.4 g of CO₂ per visit
2.36 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.36 g of CO₂e: 283.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Links look like plain text
1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.
Links must have discernible text (1 element)
Links must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (10 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 27 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 6 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
24 internal links, 9 external
The homepage links to 24 pages on coconstruct.com and 9 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 153 characters
Your meta description is 153 characters: “CoConstruct and Buildertrend are now a unified brand committed to providing a seamless experience. Sharing our vision h…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “The next chapter starts with Buildertrend”.
Title: 46 characters
Your title is a healthy 46 characters: “Construction Management Software | CoConstruct”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.coconstruct.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.coconstruct.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (959 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page points its canonical at the homepage
/old-home declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.
1 linked page hidden from search
/privacy-policy is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
4 pages share 2 titles
/ and /old-home all use the title “Construction Management Software | CoConstruct”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
1 page without a meta description
/learn-construction-software has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
5 pages share a meta description
/privacy-policy and /info/terms-of-service use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 page without an H1
/updates/bill-management-save-time-and-streamline-your-billing-process has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
11 internal pages checked
We fetched 11 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
2 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 11 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a title
All 11 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=26031261&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=d6774a8e-8f31-4c8f-98c7-671fe88cf2f3&bo=1&sid=9dab65c0cc6011f1b4c713051bbdbcfb&vid=9dab8f20cc6011f1a7ace972a2059def&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=91.
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot set properties of null (setting 'value')”.
4 distorted images
4 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
5 of 5 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
2 broken external links
2 links to other sites are dead, for example https://build.coconstruct.com/key-accounts (404).
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (coconstruct.com).
Valid certificate (78 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for coconstruct.com and is valid for another 78 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://coconstruct.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
coconstruct.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
coconstruct.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 21 years old
21 yearscoconstruct.com was registered in Apr 2005 through Squarespace Domains II LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Apr 2027
coconstruct.com is registered until Apr 2027.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 2 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 693 words of copy
The homepage carries about 693 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Learn more ”, “Learn more” and “Schedule a demo”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Segment.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 85/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 ip4:52.167.114.254 ip4:52.167.216.134 ip4:40.70.186.60 ip4:52.184.178.4 ip4:52.179.215.188 ip4:52.184.159.34 ip4…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “selector1” and “hs1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
10 trackers load before any consent
10Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads FullStory, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and HubSpot and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
18 cookies set on arrival
18Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
45 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 45 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- Webflow
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Segment
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 44 issues on coconstruct.com, including 20 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.