Website review, no card needed

coconstruct.com logo

coconstruct.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202644 issues · 111 checks

This review found 44 issues worth fixing on coconstruct.com, 18 of them high impact, across 111 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.5 s1.1 sMay 2Oct 171.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.4 s
May 9, 20261.4 s
May 16, 20261.4 s
May 23, 20261.4 s
May 30, 20261.4 s
Jun 6, 20261.3 s
Jun 13, 20261.3 s
Jun 20, 20261.4 s
Jun 27, 20261.4 s
Jul 4, 20261.5 s
Jul 11, 20261.4 s
Jul 18, 20261.3 s
Jul 25, 20261.3 s
Aug 1, 20261.3 s
Aug 8, 20261.4 s
Aug 15, 20261.5 s
Aug 22, 20261.4 s
Aug 29, 20261.3 s
Sep 5, 20261.3 s
Sep 12, 20261.2 s
Sep 19, 20261.4 s
Sep 26, 20261.3 s
Oct 3, 20261.3 s
Oct 10, 20261.3 s
Oct 17, 20261.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
111 ms92 msMay 2Oct 1798 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026109 ms
May 9, 2026103 ms
May 16, 202698 ms
May 23, 202699 ms
May 30, 202699 ms
Jun 6, 202699 ms
Jun 13, 202695 ms
Jun 20, 202694 ms
Jun 27, 202694 ms
Jul 4, 202694 ms
Jul 11, 202695 ms
Jul 18, 202699 ms
Jul 25, 202695 ms
Aug 1, 202695 ms
Aug 8, 202697 ms
Aug 15, 202696 ms
Aug 22, 2026102 ms
Aug 29, 2026109 ms
Sep 5, 2026104 ms
Sep 12, 2026104 ms
Sep 19, 2026109 ms
Sep 26, 2026104 ms
Oct 3, 2026103 ms
Oct 10, 2026100 ms
Oct 17, 202698 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of coconstruct.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. coconstruct.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. coconstruct.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  3. coconstruct.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  4. coconstruct.com at 3.1 s3.1 s
  5. coconstruct.com at 3.9 s3.9 s
  6. coconstruct.com at 4.6 s4.6 s
  7. coconstruct.com at 5.4 s5.4 s
  8. coconstruct.com at 6.2 s6.2 s

coconstruct.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

13 to fix26
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.8 s · 3.3 MB

    About 3.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.3 s

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.5 s · 655 KiB

    32 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (655 KiB).

  • Google CDN adds 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Google CDN costs a phone 1.6 s of main-thread work and 2.6 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • YouTube adds 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    YouTube costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 1.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 12.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 12.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 8.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 26

    26/100

    Your mobile performance score is 26 (desktop: 58). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, YouTube and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 6.4 MB and 4.4 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 169 KiB

    About 169 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 483 ms

    483 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 483 ms of main-thread work and 361 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Hubspot adds 451 ms

    451 ms

    Hubspot costs a phone 451 ms of main-thread work and 295 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 394 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • website-files.com adds 152 ms

    152 ms

    website-files.com costs a phone 152 ms of main-thread work and 577 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 35 KiB

    2 images could be 35 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    29 KiB

    29 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    21 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 58 but mobile only 26. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 45.8 s

    45.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 45.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 3.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 6.2 s

    6.2 s

    Your largest element takes 6.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “The next chapter starts with Buildertrend CoConstruct's tra…”.

  • Speed Index: 9.2 s

    9.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.153

    0.153

    The layout shifts by 0.153 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 14 images without width and height

    14 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 109 ms to 98 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 96 ms

    96 ms

    Real visitors wait 96 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 301 ms

    301 ms

    Real visitors wait 301 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 8.3 MB in 189 requests

    8.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 8.3 MB in 189 requests on a phone: scripts 5.5 MB (57), other files 1.1 MB (53) and images 536 KiB (41). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 2.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.36 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.36 g of CO₂e: 283.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 9091
  • Links look like plain text

    1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.

  • Links must have discernible text (1 element)

    Links must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (10 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 27 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 6 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9291
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 24 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 24 pages on coconstruct.com and 9 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 153 characters

    Your meta description is 153 characters: “CoConstruct and Buildertrend are now a unified brand committed to providing a seamless experience. Sharing our vision h…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “The next chapter starts with Buildertrend”.

  • Title: 46 characters

    Your title is a healthy 46 characters: “Construction Management Software | CoConstruct”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.coconstruct.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.coconstruct.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (959 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

6 to fix64
  • 1 page points its canonical at the homepage

    /old-home declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    /privacy-policy is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 4 pages share 2 titles

    / and /old-home all use the title “Construction Management Software | CoConstruct”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    /learn-construction-software has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 5 pages share a meta description

    /privacy-policy and /info/terms-of-service use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 page without an H1

    /updates/bill-management-save-time-and-streamline-your-billing-process has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 11 internal pages checked

    We fetched 11 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

2 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 11 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a title

    All 11 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 6974
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=26031261&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=d6774a8e-8f31-4c8f-98c7-671fe88cf2f3&bo=1&sid=9dab65c0cc6011f1b4c713051bbdbcfb&vid=9dab8f20cc6011f1a7ace972a2059def&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=91.

  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot set properties of null (setting 'value')”.

  • 4 distorted images

    4 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    5 of 5 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix94
  • 2 broken external links

    2 links to other sites are dead, for example https://build.coconstruct.com/key-accounts (404).

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (coconstruct.com).

  • Valid certificate (78 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for coconstruct.com and is valid for another 78 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://coconstruct.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    coconstruct.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    coconstruct.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 21 years old

    21 years

    coconstruct.com was registered in Apr 2005 through Squarespace Domains II LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Apr 2027

    coconstruct.com is registered until Apr 2027.

Content and conversion

2 to fix70
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 693 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 693 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Learn more ”, “Learn more” and “Schedule a demo”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Segment.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.

Email authentication

85
  • Email authentication score: 85/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 ip4:52.167.114.254 ip4:52.167.216.134 ip4:40.70.186.60 ip4:52.184.178.4 ip4:52.179.215.188 ip4:52.184.159.34 ip4…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “selector1” and “hs1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 10 trackers load before any consent

    10

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads FullStory, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and HubSpot and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 18 cookies set on arrival

    18

    Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 45 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 45 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Webflow
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Segment

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 44 issues on coconstruct.com, including 20 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25