Website review, no card needed

codecamp.com.au logo

codecamp.com.au website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202645 issues · 110 checks

This review found 45 issues worth fixing on codecamp.com.au, 15 of them high impact, across 110 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.6 s1.3 sMay 9Oct 242.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.7 s
May 16, 20261.6 s
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20262.5 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.8 s
Jun 20, 20262.7 s
Jun 27, 20262.7 s
Jul 4, 20262.7 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.3 s
Jul 25, 20261.8 s
Aug 1, 20261.6 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20263.1 s
Aug 22, 20263.4 s
Aug 29, 20263.3 s
Sep 5, 20263.3 s
Sep 12, 20263.4 s
Sep 19, 20263.3 s
Sep 26, 20263.2 s
Oct 3, 20263.2 s
Oct 10, 20262.9 s
Oct 17, 20262.6 s
Oct 24, 20262.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
162 ms133 msMay 9Oct 24145 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026145 ms
May 16, 2026142 ms
May 23, 2026145 ms
May 30, 2026142 ms
Jun 6, 2026143 ms
Jun 13, 2026143 ms
Jun 20, 2026143 ms
Jun 27, 2026142 ms
Jul 4, 2026140 ms
Jul 11, 2026140 ms
Jul 18, 2026138 ms
Jul 25, 2026139 ms
Aug 1, 2026143 ms
Aug 8, 2026136 ms
Aug 15, 2026157 ms
Aug 22, 2026159 ms
Aug 29, 2026159 ms
Sep 5, 2026158 ms
Sep 12, 2026159 ms
Sep 19, 2026156 ms
Sep 26, 2026155 ms
Oct 3, 2026154 ms
Oct 10, 2026146 ms
Oct 17, 2026144 ms
Oct 24, 2026145 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

12 to fix35
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    7.5 s · 1.4 MB

    About 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.1 s

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.1 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.6 s · 385 KiB

    19 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (385 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 35

    35/100

    Your mobile performance score is 35 (desktop: 63). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, YouTube and Facebook and others), adding 3.0 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    850 ms · 199 KiB

    About 199 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 850 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 465 ms

    465 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 465 ms of main-thread work and 723 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • YouTube adds 388 ms

    388 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 388 ms of main-thread work and 981 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 1,683 HTML elements

    The page has 1,683 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • website-files.com adds 104 ms

    104 ms

    website-files.com costs a phone 104 ms of main-thread work and 486 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 108 ms

    108 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 108 ms of main-thread work and 354 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 19 long tasks on the main thread

    19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 228 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 51 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 51 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 16 KiB

    16 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 8 KiB

    8 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Improve image delivery

    143 KiB

    10 images could be 143 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 63 but mobile only 35. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 10.1 s

    10.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 10.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 25.8 s

    25.8 s

    Your largest element takes 25.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Australia's favourite holiday and after-school program! Cod…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 28.3 s

    28.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 28.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.1 s

    10.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 861 ms

    861 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 861 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 40% slower for real visitors

    +40%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 29 images without width and height

    29 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 145 ms to 145 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 154 ms

    154 ms

    Real visitors wait 154 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.08

    0.08

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.08 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 656 ms

    656 ms

    Real visitors wait 656 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.075

    0.075

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.075, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix81
  • Page weight: 3.9 MB in 140 requests

    3.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.9 MB in 140 requests on a phone: scripts 3.0 MB (49), fonts 411 KiB (16) and images 296 KiB (33). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    645cc5184224ffc2c3a3daf4_Westpac_Landscape.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.12 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.12 g of CO₂e: 134.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 9092
  • 33 text elements with low contrast

    33 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (31 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 31 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 30 links without text

    30 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 6 form fields without a label

    6 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h6, h3 → h6 and h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 168 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9284
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 5 H1 headlines

    There are 5 <h1> headlines (“Australia's favourite holiday and after-school pr…”, “What parents say” and “Our teachers”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 26 links with vague text

    26 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • Meta description is long (232 characters)

    Your meta description is 232 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 185 internal links, 61 external

    The homepage links to 185 pages on codecamp.com.au and 61 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Title: 61 characters

    Your title is a healthy 61 characters: “Code Camp | Australia's favourite holiday & after-school fun!”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.codecamp.com.au/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.codecamp.com.au/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,495 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 1 page without a meta description

    /camps/robotics-masters has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 13 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 13 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /camps/little-coders, whose canonical is /program/little-coders. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 74 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 6974
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=25000973&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=5d60d32e-7f14-480a-8d6f-c7bd8b7eb308&bo=1&sid=65fe5160d30b11f1af95cd9b1362f830&vid=65fe8760d30b11f1bb931183142fd569&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=91.

  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “ProductReview reviews-horizontal widget: you're trying to initialise the widget again and because this action could slo…”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    10 of 10 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix79
  • 1 broken link to your own pages

    1 link from your homepage to your own site is broken, for example https://www.codecamp.com.au/online-after-school-programs (404).

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.codecamp.com.au/camps/youtube-creators.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

5 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (codecamp.com.au).

  • Valid certificate (42 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for codecamp.com.au and is valid for another 42 days.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://codecamp.com.au redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    codecamp.com.au has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    codecamp.com.au's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,991 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,991 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 32 calls to action

    The homepage has 32 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Learn More” and “Sign Up”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 testimonial or review blocks, a star rating, 19 trust badges and “over 1110 reviews”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Email authentication

95
  • Email authentication score: 95/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:helpscoutemail.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:emsd1.com include:_spf.s…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “k1” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 9 trackers load before any consent

    9

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and LinkedIn Insight and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 21 cookies set on arrival

    21

    Opening the homepage sets 21 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 51 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 51 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Webflow
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Webflow

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 45 issues on codecamp.com.au, including 21 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25