Website review, no card needed
codecamp.com.au website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202645 issues · 110 checks
This review found 45 issues worth fixing on codecamp.com.au, 15 of them high impact, across 110 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 145 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 142 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 145 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 145 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
7.5 s · 1.4 MBAbout 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.5 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.1 s7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.1 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.6 s · 385 KiB19 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (385 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 35
35/100Your mobile performance score is 35 (desktop: 63). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, YouTube and Facebook and others), adding 3.0 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
850 ms · 199 KiBAbout 199 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 850 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 465 ms
465 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 465 ms of main-thread work and 723 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
YouTube adds 388 ms
388 msYouTube costs a phone 388 ms of main-thread work and 981 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.9 s
A phone's processor spends 3.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
1,683 HTML elements
The page has 1,683 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
website-files.com adds 104 ms
104 mswebsite-files.com costs a phone 104 ms of main-thread work and 486 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google CDN adds 108 ms
108 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 108 ms of main-thread work and 354 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
19 long tasks on the main thread
19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 228 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 51 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 51 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 16 KiB16 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 8 KiB8 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Improve image delivery
143 KiB10 images could be 143 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 63 but mobile only 35. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
First Contentful Paint: 10.1 s
10.1 sThe first text or image appears after 10.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 25.8 s
25.8 sYour largest element takes 25.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Australia's favourite holiday and after-school program! Cod…”.
Time to Interactive: 28.3 s
28.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 28.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.1 s
10.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 861 ms
861 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 861 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 40% slower for real visitors
+40%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
29 images without width and height
29 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 145 ms to 145 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 154 ms
154 msReal visitors wait 154 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.08
0.08For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.08 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 656 ms
656 msReal visitors wait 656 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.075
0.075The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.075, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.9 MB in 140 requests
3.9 MBYour homepage downloads 3.9 MB in 140 requests on a phone: scripts 3.0 MB (49), fonts 411 KiB (16) and images 296 KiB (33). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
645cc5184224ffc2c3a3daf4_Westpac_Landscape.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit
1.12 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.12 g of CO₂e: 134.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
33 text elements with low contrast
33 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (31 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 31 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
30 links without text
30 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
6 form fields without a label
6 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h6, h3 → h6 and h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 168 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
5 H1 headlines
There are 5 <h1> headlines (“Australia's favourite holiday and after-school pr…”, “What parents say” and “Our teachers”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
26 links with vague text
26 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
Meta description is long (232 characters)
Your meta description is 232 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
185 internal links, 61 external
The homepage links to 185 pages on codecamp.com.au and 61 external pages.
5 checks passed
Title: 61 characters
Your title is a healthy 61 characters: “Code Camp | Australia's favourite holiday & after-school fun!”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.codecamp.com.au/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.codecamp.com.au/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,495 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
/camps/robotics-masters has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
13 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 13 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /camps/little-coders, whose canonical is /program/little-coders. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 74 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=25000973&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=5d60d32e-7f14-480a-8d6f-c7bd8b7eb308&bo=1&sid=65fe5160d30b11f1af95cd9b1362f830&vid=65fe8760d30b11f1bb931183142fd569&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=91.
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “ProductReview reviews-horizontal widget: you're trying to initialise the widget again and because this action could slo…”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
10 of 10 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
1 broken link to your own pages
1 link from your homepage to your own site is broken, for example https://www.codecamp.com.au/online-after-school-programs (404).
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.codecamp.com.au/camps/youtube-creators.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (codecamp.com.au).
Valid certificate (42 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for codecamp.com.au and is valid for another 42 days.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://codecamp.com.au redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
codecamp.com.au has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
codecamp.com.au's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,991 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,991 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
32 calls to action
The homepage has 32 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Learn More” and “Sign Up”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 2 testimonial or review blocks, a star rating, 19 trust badges and “over 1110 reviews”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 95/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:helpscoutemail.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:emsd1.com include:_spf.s…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “k1” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
9 trackers load before any consent
9Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and LinkedIn Insight and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
21 cookies set on arrival
21Opening the homepage sets 21 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
51 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 51 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- Webflow
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Webflow
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 45 issues on codecamp.com.au, including 21 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.