Website review, no card needed

CodeRabbit logo

coderabbit.ai website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202634 issues · 101 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on coderabbit.ai, 14 of them high impact, across 101 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

Read the full growth playbook for CodeRabbit

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.8 s1.6 sJun 6Oct 242.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Jun 6, 20261.9 s
Jun 13, 20261.7 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20261.9 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.8 s
Aug 1, 20262.0 s
Aug 8, 20262.2 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.4 s
Aug 29, 20262.4 s
Sep 5, 20262.4 s
Sep 12, 20262.4 s
Sep 19, 20262.5 s
Sep 26, 20262.6 s
Oct 3, 20262.6 s
Oct 10, 20262.6 s
Oct 17, 20262.6 s
Oct 24, 20262.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
473 ms167 msJun 6Oct 24404 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Jun 6, 2026236 ms
Jun 13, 2026202 ms
Jun 20, 2026217 ms
Jun 27, 2026229 ms
Jul 4, 2026220 ms
Jul 11, 2026241 ms
Jul 18, 2026239 ms
Jul 25, 2026230 ms
Aug 1, 2026255 ms
Aug 8, 2026279 ms
Aug 15, 2026299 ms
Aug 22, 2026360 ms
Aug 29, 2026426 ms
Sep 5, 2026431 ms
Sep 12, 2026438 ms
Sep 19, 2026427 ms
Sep 26, 2026420 ms
Oct 3, 2026408 ms
Oct 10, 2026405 ms
Oct 17, 2026403 ms
Oct 24, 2026404 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of coderabbit.ai (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. coderabbit.ai at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. coderabbit.ai at 1.4 s1.4 s
  3. coderabbit.ai at 2.1 s2.1 s
  4. coderabbit.ai at 2.7 s2.7 s
  5. coderabbit.ai at 3.4 s3.4 s
  6. coderabbit.ai at 4.1 s4.1 s
  7. coderabbit.ai at 4.8 s4.8 s
  8. coderabbit.ai at 5.5 s5.5 s

coderabbit.ai does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

9 to fix38
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.5 s · 910 KiB

    About 910 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.6 s · 647 KiB

    27 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (647 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 38

    38/100

    Your mobile performance score is 38 (desktop: 64). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and TikTok and others), adding 1.1 MB and 937 ms of main-thread time.

  • Render-blocking requests

    750 ms

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    500 ms · 135 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 135 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 279 ms

    279 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 279 ms of main-thread work and 356 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,892 HTML elements

    The page has 1,892 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 52 KiB

    About 52 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 201 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 64 but mobile only 38. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    9 KiB

    9 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 12 ms

    12 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 12 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 15.3 s

    15.3 s

    Your largest element takes 15.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “The future isn't writing code. It's r e v i e w i n g i t .…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 21.1 s

    21.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 21.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.5 s

    4.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.1 s

    8.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 895 ms

    895 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 895 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 417 ms

    417 ms

    Real visitors wait 417 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 84% slower for real visitors

    +84%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 236 ms to 404 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 47% slower for real visitors

    +47%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

2 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.8 MB in 177 requests

    2.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.8 MB in 177 requests on a phone: scripts 2.4 MB (76), stylesheets 112 KiB (6) and other files 84 KiB (62). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.81 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.81 g of CO₂e: 96.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9494
  • Hidden but focusable

    1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (5 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 59 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 50 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 3 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 9298
  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 49 internal links, 14 external

    The homepage links to 49 pages on coderabbit.ai and 14 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 144 characters

    Your meta description is 144 characters: “Ship more software, faster, with code you trust. Independent AI code review, PR triage, change explanations, and contin…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “The future isn't writing code. It's reviewing it.securing it.prioritizing it.reviewing it.”.

  • Title: 57 characters

    Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “CodeRabbit | Governance & Control for Agentic Development”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.coderabbit.ai/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.coderabbit.ai/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,724 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (54 KiB, 288 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

3 to fix75
  • 1 page without a title

    /feed has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    /feed has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    /feed has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 38 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 7397
  • 3 third-party cookies

    3 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    13 of 15 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix94
  • 1 broken external link

    1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://bsky.app/profile/coderabbitai.bsky.social (404).

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (coderabbit.ai).

  • Valid certificate (39 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR1 verifies for coderabbit.ai and is valid for another 39 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://coderabbit.ai redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • security.txt published

    A security.txt file tells researchers how to report a problem with your site.

Domain and trust

  • DNSSEC is off

    coderabbit.ai's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 3 years old

    3 years

    coderabbit.ai was registered in Apr 2023 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Certificate issuers are restricted

    CAA records allow only letsencrypt.org, pki.goog, sectigo.com and globalsign.com to issue certificates for coderabbit.ai, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.

  • Registered until Apr 2027

    coderabbit.ai is registered until Apr 2027.

Content and conversion

2 to fix83
  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,103 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,103 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Try it for free”.

  • 10 calls to action

    The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Pricing”, “Contact Us” and “Get a free trial”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 130 testimonial or review blocks, 1 customer or partner logo and “Trusted by 17K customers”.

Email authentication

100
  • Email authentication score: 100/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:43613284.spf05.hubspotemail.net include:_spf.firebasemail.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:_spf.g…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “k2” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 10 trackers load before any consent

    10

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Ketch) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 17 cookies set on arrival

    17

    Opening the homepage sets 17 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 34 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 34 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Ketch

    A consent management tool (Ketch) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Hosting
Vercel

Hiring

Hiring
46 open roles
Teams
Sales (19), Product (7), Marketing (6), Engineering (4)
Job board
ashby

Company

Founded
2023
Headquarters
Walnut Creek

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on coderabbit.ai, including 21 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25