Website review, no card needed

colloky.cl logo

colloky.cl website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202658 issues · 112 checks

This review found 58 issues worth fixing on colloky.cl, 28 of them high impact, across 112 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.5 s2.7 sMay 16Oct 313.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.3 s
May 23, 20263.3 s
May 30, 20263.1 s
Jun 6, 20262.9 s
Jun 13, 20262.8 s
Jun 20, 20262.8 s
Jun 27, 20263.0 s
Jul 4, 20263.2 s
Jul 11, 20263.2 s
Jul 18, 20263.1 s
Jul 25, 20263.1 s
Aug 1, 20263.0 s
Aug 8, 20263.1 s
Aug 15, 20263.1 s
Aug 22, 20263.2 s
Aug 29, 20263.3 s
Sep 5, 20263.4 s
Sep 12, 20263.4 s
Sep 19, 20263.3 s
Sep 26, 20263.3 s
Oct 3, 20263.1 s
Oct 10, 20262.9 s
Oct 17, 20262.9 s
Oct 24, 20262.9 s
Oct 31, 20263.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
327 ms236 msMay 16Oct 31302 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026251 ms
May 23, 2026246 ms
May 30, 2026249 ms
Jun 6, 2026252 ms
Jun 13, 2026253 ms
Jun 20, 2026255 ms
Jun 27, 2026256 ms
Jul 4, 2026262 ms
Jul 11, 2026271 ms
Jul 18, 2026273 ms
Jul 25, 2026271 ms
Aug 1, 2026277 ms
Aug 8, 2026276 ms
Aug 15, 2026279 ms
Aug 22, 2026287 ms
Aug 29, 2026288 ms
Sep 5, 2026293 ms
Sep 12, 2026296 ms
Sep 19, 2026297 ms
Sep 26, 2026295 ms
Oct 3, 2026316 ms
Oct 10, 2026310 ms
Oct 17, 2026309 ms
Oct 24, 2026310 ms
Oct 31, 2026302 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of colloky.cl (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. colloky.cl at 1.3 s1.3 s
  2. colloky.cl at 2.5 s2.5 s
  3. colloky.cl at 3.8 s3.8 s
  4. colloky.cl at 5.0 s5.0 s
  5. colloky.cl at 6.3 s6.3 s
  6. colloky.cl at 7.5 s7.5 s
  7. colloky.cl at 8.8 s8.8 s
  8. colloky.cl at 10.0 s10.0 s

colloky.cl does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

13 to fix27
  • Improve image delivery

    11.8 s · 3.2 MB

    8 images could be 3.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 11.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    5.8 s · 953 KiB

    About 953 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.8 s faster on a phone.

  • vtexassets.com adds 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    vtexassets.com costs a phone 1.3 s of main-thread work and 8.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.1 s

    38 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.1 s.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 555 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 27

    27/100

    Your mobile performance score is 27. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 9.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 9.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (vtexassets.com, Google Tag Manager and Google CDN and others), adding 10.8 MB and 4.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Google CDN adds 741 ms

    741 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 741 ms of main-thread work and 739 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 601 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    412 KiB

    23 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (412 KiB).

  • Facebook adds 377 ms

    377 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 377 ms of main-thread work and 283 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • TikTok adds 315 ms

    315 ms

    TikTok costs a phone 315 ms of main-thread work and 288 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    180 ms · 70 KiB

    About 70 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 180 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    189 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 189 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 26 ms

    26 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 26 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.52

    0.52

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.52 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 7.8 s

    7.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 7.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 35.3 s

    35.3 s

    Your largest element takes 35.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 39.2 s

    39.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 39.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 14.9 s

    14.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 14.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user INP: 259 ms

    259 ms

    Real visitors wait 259 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 23% slower for real visitors

    +23%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 251 ms to 302 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 945 ms

    945 ms

    Real visitors wait 945 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 19 images without width and height

    19 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

3 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 10% faster for real visitors

    -10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.003

    0.003

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.003, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix47
  • Page weight: 7.8 MB in 208 requests

    7.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.8 MB in 208 requests on a phone: images 3.9 MB (34), scripts 2.9 MB (67) and other files 727 KiB (53). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 4 images over 500 KB

    4 images weigh 2.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    7dd9a40e-6f61-45df-9c9e-ea16d65b6b8c___b79eafd3abba8ffc4cd57 is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 2.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.22 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.22 g of CO₂e: 266.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 7584
  • 3 buttons without a name

    3 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 5 text elements with low contrast

    5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 5 tap targets too small

    5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (6 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 14 links without text

    14 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 16 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 9 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10083
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 33 internal links, 2 external

    The homepage links to 33 pages on colloky.cl and 2 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 145 characters

    Your meta description is 145 characters: “Encuentra los mejores modelos de calzado, ropa y accesorio infantil. Compra 100% online con despacho a domicilio y hast…”.

  • Title: 43 characters

    Your title is a healthy 43 characters: “Colloky: Ropa y Calzado Infantil de Calidad”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.colloky.cl/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.colloky.cl/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (172 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

5 to fix67
  • 4 pages without a title

    /calzado, /ropa, /accesorios and /escolar have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 6 linked pages hidden from search

    /821, /822, /823, /824, /826 and /825 are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 4 pages without a meta description

    /calzado, /ropa, /accesorios and /escolar have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 6 pages share a meta description

    /821, /822, /823, /824, /826 and /825 use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 7 pages without an H1

    /calzado, /ropa, /accesorios, /escolar, /outlet and /guia-tallas-zapatos and 1 other have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 4 pages slow to respond

    /calzado, /accesorios, /escolar and /sale took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 30 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 7370
  • 9 broken images

    9 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.colloky.cl/.

  • 11 small tap targets

    11 of 34 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'register')”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix88
  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://vtex.com/.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

6 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (colloky.cl).

  • Valid certificate (49 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR1 verifies for colloky.cl and is valid for another 49 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://colloky.cl redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 34 links work

    All 34 links checked from your homepage (32 internal, 2 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    colloky.cl has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

Content and conversion

4 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Only about 170 words

    The homepage has only about 170 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

Email authentication

95
  • Email authentication score: 95/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.colloky_cl._d.easydmarc.pro ~all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel, Microsoft Ads and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 18 cookies set on arrival

    18

    Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 31 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 31 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
React
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
GoDaddy

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 58 issues on colloky.cl, including 25 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25