Website review, no card needed

commercehub.com logo

commercehub.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202631 issues · 98 checks

This review found 31 issues worth fixing on commercehub.com, 11 of them high impact, across 98 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.3 s2.4 sMay 9Oct 243.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.2 s
May 16, 20263.2 s
May 23, 20263.1 s
May 30, 20263.1 s
Jun 6, 20263.1 s
Jun 13, 20262.8 s
Jun 20, 20262.7 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.6 s
Jul 11, 20262.9 s
Jul 18, 20263.0 s
Jul 25, 20263.1 s
Aug 1, 20263.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.8 s
Aug 15, 20262.8 s
Aug 22, 20262.8 s
Aug 29, 20262.9 s
Sep 5, 20262.9 s
Sep 12, 20262.9 s
Sep 19, 20262.9 s
Sep 26, 20263.1 s
Oct 3, 20263.1 s
Oct 10, 20263.1 s
Oct 17, 20263.1 s
Oct 24, 20263.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
251 ms149 msMay 9Oct 24221 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026216 ms
May 16, 2026201 ms
May 23, 2026189 ms
May 30, 2026190 ms
Jun 6, 2026183 ms
Jun 13, 2026171 ms
Jun 20, 2026167 ms
Jun 27, 2026161 ms
Jul 4, 2026163 ms
Jul 11, 2026179 ms
Jul 18, 2026193 ms
Jul 25, 2026193 ms
Aug 1, 2026183 ms
Aug 8, 2026179 ms
Aug 15, 2026182 ms
Aug 22, 2026197 ms
Aug 29, 2026214 ms
Sep 5, 2026232 ms
Sep 12, 2026232 ms
Sep 19, 2026219 ms
Sep 26, 2026239 ms
Oct 3, 2026227 ms
Oct 10, 2026228 ms
Oct 17, 2026233 ms
Oct 24, 2026221 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of commercehub.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. commercehub.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. commercehub.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. commercehub.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. commercehub.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. commercehub.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. commercehub.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. commercehub.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. commercehub.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

commercehub.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

7 to fix57
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.7 s · 359 KiB

    About 359 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.9 s

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.5 s · 332 KiB

    23 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (332 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 57

    57/100

    Your mobile performance score is 57 (desktop: 75). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Optanon and pcdn.co and others), adding 1.3 MB and 402 ms of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    450 ms · 77 KiB

    1 image could be 77 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • pcdn.co adds 70 ms

    70 ms

    pcdn.co costs a phone 70 ms of main-thread work and 790 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 116 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    99 KiB

    About 99 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    40 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 40 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 901 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 21 ms

    21 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 21 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.7 s

    10.7 s

    Your largest element takes 10.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.0 s

    5.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 10.7 s

    10.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 10.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.1 s

    7.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    Real visitors wait 3.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 281 ms

    281 ms

    Real visitors wait 281 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 216 ms to 221 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 156 ms

    156 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 156 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.45 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.45 g of CO₂e: 54.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.6 MB in 106 requests

    1.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.6 MB in 106 requests on a phone: scripts 755 KiB (27), images 613 KiB (55) and stylesheets 113 KiB (6). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9596
  • Form elements should have a visible label (2 elements)

    Form elements should have a visible label: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 74 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 8593
  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 85 internal links, 16 external

    The homepage links to 85 pages on commercehub.com and 16 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 140 characters

    Your meta description is 140 characters: “Rithum is the connected commerce operations platform helping brands and retailers list, fulfill, and optimize products …”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Channel Growth + Commerce Operations”.

  • Title: 37 characters

    Your title is a healthy 37 characters: “Commerce Operations Platform | Rithum”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.rithum.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.rithum.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,170 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 page without a meta description

    /products has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 46 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 2 small tap targets

    2 of 7 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Error with Permissions-Policy header: Parse of permissions policy failed because of errors reported by structured heade…”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix81
  • 1 broken link to your own pages

    1 link from your homepage to your own site is broken, for example https://www.rithum.com/?post_type=case_study&p=681 (404).

  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • 2 redirects before the homepage

    Opening https://commercehub.com goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.

  • 3 links through redirect chains

    3 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://complete.channeladvisor.com/.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

6 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (rithum.com).

  • Valid certificate (72 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR1 verifies for commercehub.com and is valid for another 72 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://commercehub.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    rithum.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    rithum.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 23 years old

    23 years

    rithum.com was registered in Oct 2003 through MarkMonitor Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Oct 2027

    rithum.com is registered until Oct 2027.

Content and conversion

2 to fix83
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 16 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 621 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 621 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get started”.

  • 11 calls to action

    The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Contact” and “Get started”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Email authentication

1 to fix70
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be commercehub.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.

  • Email authentication score: 70/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 ip4:12.107.130.0/24 ip4:199.255.192.0/22 ip4:199.127.232.0/22 ip4:54.240.0.0/18 ip4:46.232.183.0/24 ip4:23.83.20…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector2”, “s2” and “mandrill”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 18 cookies set on arrival

    18

    Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 25 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 25 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2025.
  • It runs WordPress 3.7.1; the current release is 7.1.3.

Stack

CMS
WordPress 3.7.1
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
AWS

Hiring

Hiring
10 open roles
Teams
Client Success Brands - AMER (1431) (3), Global Strategic Sales (4470) (2), Marketing (4000) (2), Brands Strategy and Engagement (1480) (1)
Job board
greenhouse

Company

Founded
1997
Headquarters
Albany

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 31 issues on commercehub.com, including 16 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25