Website review, no card needed

compudopt.org logo

compudopt.org website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202647 issues · 106 checks

This review found 47 issues worth fixing on compudopt.org, 16 of them high impact, across 106 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.9 s1.4 sApr 25Oct 101.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20261.8 s
May 2, 20261.8 s
May 9, 20261.8 s
May 16, 20261.8 s
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20261.8 s
Jun 13, 20261.8 s
Jun 20, 20261.6 s
Jun 27, 20261.6 s
Jul 4, 20261.5 s
Jul 11, 20261.5 s
Jul 18, 20261.5 s
Jul 25, 20261.5 s
Aug 1, 20261.5 s
Aug 8, 20261.5 s
Aug 15, 20261.5 s
Aug 22, 20261.5 s
Aug 29, 20261.6 s
Sep 5, 20261.6 s
Sep 12, 20261.6 s
Sep 19, 20261.6 s
Sep 26, 20261.6 s
Oct 3, 20261.5 s
Oct 10, 20261.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
278 ms151 msApr 25Oct 10263 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 2026208 ms
May 2, 2026207 ms
May 9, 2026213 ms
May 16, 2026225 ms
May 23, 2026233 ms
May 30, 2026235 ms
Jun 6, 2026232 ms
Jun 13, 2026229 ms
Jun 20, 2026200 ms
Jun 27, 2026188 ms
Jul 4, 2026171 ms
Jul 11, 2026167 ms
Jul 18, 2026166 ms
Jul 25, 2026169 ms
Aug 1, 2026185 ms
Aug 8, 2026201 ms
Aug 15, 2026218 ms
Aug 22, 2026225 ms
Aug 29, 2026237 ms
Sep 5, 2026241 ms
Sep 12, 2026244 ms
Sep 19, 2026258 ms
Sep 26, 2026262 ms
Oct 3, 2026261 ms
Oct 10, 2026263 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

11 to fix17
  • Improve image delivery

    3.3 s · 4.3 MB

    10 images could be 4.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.7 s

    37 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.7 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 17

    17/100

    Your mobile performance score is 17 (desktop: 64). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Unpkg and others), adding 1.2 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 730 ms

    730 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 730 ms of main-thread work and 515 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    460 KiB

    10 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (460 KiB).

  • Facebook adds 423 ms

    423 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 423 ms of main-thread work and 265 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 10 long tasks on the main thread

    10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 339 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    312 KiB

    About 312 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Google Fonts adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    Google Fonts costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 388 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 64 but mobile only 17. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 33 ms

    33 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 33 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 20.0 s

    20.0 s

    Your largest element takes 20.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 27.1 s

    27.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 27.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 11.2 s

    11.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.578

    0.578

    The layout shifts by 0.578 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.5 s

    4.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 736 ms

    736 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 736 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user INP: 243 ms

    243 ms

    Real visitors wait 243 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 26% slower for real visitors

    +26%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 208 ms to 263 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • 21 images without width and height

    21 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 781 ms

    781 ms

    Real visitors wait 781 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 14% faster for real visitors

    -14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

6 to fix29
  • Page weight: 18.0 MB in 139 requests

    18.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 18.0 MB in 139 requests on a phone: images 12.1 MB (54), media 4.4 MB (1) and scripts 981 KiB (29). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 8 images over 500 KB

    8 images weigh 7.6 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 14 images in older formats

    14 images (8.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    CompudoptNewportNightOut-16-edit-2000px-768x768.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (801 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 7 images far larger than shown

    150 KiB

    7 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example United-Way-of-Dallas-Logo-768x495.jpeg at 390 px wide, shown at 121 px. Resized copies would save about 150 KiB.

  • About 5.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    5.11 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.11 g of CO₂e: 612.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8793
  • 19 tap targets too small

    19 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 6 text elements with low contrast

    6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 44 images without alt text

    44 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (19 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 19 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h2 → h6 and h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 8586
  • Title is long (74 characters)

    Your title is 74 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Tech Access: Free Computers, Low-Cost Internet, Tech Education | Compudopt”.

  • 4 H1 headlines

    There are 4 <h1> headlines (“Empowering communities with digital access.”, “Get Connected with low-cost 5G internet” and “Transforming communities through tech education”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 86 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 86 pages on compudopt.org and 8 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 155 characters

    Your meta description is 155 characters: “Compudopt recycles and refurbishes donated computers, provides free computers, low-cost internet, and tech education to…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.compudopt.org/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Article, ImageObject, Organization, Person and WebPage.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.compudopt.org/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,114 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 4 pages share 2 titles

    /programs/compudopt-connect-low-cost-internet and /compudopt-connect-low-cost-internet all use the title “Compudopt Connect Low Cost Internet | Compudopt”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 3 pages without a meta description

    /tech-support, /ways-to-give and /ways-to-give/donate have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 4 pages share a meta description

    /programs/compudopt-connect-low-cost-internet and /compudopt-connect-low-cost-internet use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 3 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 3 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /programs/compudopt-connect-low-cost-internet, whose canonical is /compudopt-connect-low-cost-internet. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 42 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 7 small tap targets

    7 of 14 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Unexpected token '<'”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix86
  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

5 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (compudopt.org).

  • Valid certificate (85 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for compudopt.org and is valid for another 85 days.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://compudopt.org redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 46 links work

    All 46 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 6 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    compudopt.org has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    compudopt.org's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 19 years old

    19 years

    compudopt.org was registered in Aug 2007 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Aug 2027

    compudopt.org is registered until Aug 2027.

Content and conversion

2 to fix81
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 392 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 392 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • 8 calls to action

    The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Sign up for a computer giveaway!”, “Contact Us” and “Learn More”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (5 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 27 testimonial or review blocks and 3 customer or partner logos.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Email authentication

1 to fix70
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be compudopt.org is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.

  • Email authentication score: 70/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.google.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:sendgrid.net ~all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 21 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 21 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • 1 plugin is behind its latest release.weglot 6.4.2 → 6.4.3

Stack

CMS
WordPress 7.1.3
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 47 issues on compudopt.org, including 21 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25