Website review, no card needed

conseilfleursdebach.fr logo

conseilfleursdebach.fr website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202633 issues · 80 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on conseilfleursdebach.fr, 12 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.6 s1.5 sMay 23Nov 71.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20261.5 s
May 30, 20261.6 s
Jun 6, 20261.6 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.6 s
Jun 27, 20261.5 s
Jul 4, 20261.5 s
Jul 11, 20261.5 s
Jul 18, 20261.5 s
Jul 25, 20261.5 s
Aug 1, 20261.5 s
Aug 8, 20261.6 s
Aug 15, 20261.6 s
Aug 22, 20261.6 s
Aug 29, 20261.6 s
Sep 5, 20261.6 s
Sep 12, 20261.6 s
Sep 19, 20261.6 s
Sep 26, 20261.6 s
Oct 3, 20261.6 s
Oct 10, 20261.6 s
Oct 17, 20261.6 s
Oct 24, 20261.6 s
Oct 31, 20261.5 s
Nov 7, 20261.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
167 ms141 msMay 23Nov 7151 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026144 ms
May 30, 2026146 ms
Jun 6, 2026147 ms
Jun 13, 2026149 ms
Jun 20, 2026150 ms
Jun 27, 2026152 ms
Jul 4, 2026155 ms
Jul 11, 2026158 ms
Jul 18, 2026162 ms
Jul 25, 2026162 ms
Aug 1, 2026164 ms
Aug 8, 2026162 ms
Aug 15, 2026159 ms
Aug 22, 2026155 ms
Aug 29, 2026147 ms
Sep 5, 2026149 ms
Sep 12, 2026149 ms
Sep 19, 2026150 ms
Sep 26, 2026154 ms
Oct 3, 2026153 ms
Oct 10, 2026154 ms
Oct 17, 2026153 ms
Oct 24, 2026151 ms
Oct 31, 2026152 ms
Nov 7, 2026151 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of conseilfleursdebach.fr (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. conseilfleursdebach.fr at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. conseilfleursdebach.fr at 2.1 s2.1 s
  3. conseilfleursdebach.fr at 3.1 s3.1 s
  4. conseilfleursdebach.fr at 4.2 s4.2 s
  5. conseilfleursdebach.fr at 5.2 s5.2 s
  6. conseilfleursdebach.fr at 6.2 s6.2 s
  7. conseilfleursdebach.fr at 7.3 s7.3 s
  8. conseilfleursdebach.fr at 8.3 s8.3 s

Speed

5 to fix41
  • Improve image delivery

    2.8 s · 1.5 MB

    14 images could be 1.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.8 s · 266 KiB

    About 266 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 41

    41/100

    Your mobile performance score is 41. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    450 ms · 203 KiB

    32 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (203 KiB).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 171 ms

    171 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 171 ms of main-thread work and 351 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Clarity and others), adding 771 KiB and 383 ms of main-thread time.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 142 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    106 KiB

    About 106 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Minify CSS

    8 KiB

    8 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 479 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 308 ms

    308 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 308 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 16.2 s

    16.2 s

    Your largest element takes 16.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Les fleurs de Bach n° 55 Déficit de concentration et l'hype…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 18.2 s

    18.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 18.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 11.7 s

    11.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.786

    0.786

    The layout shifts by 0.786 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 144 ms to 151 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 151 ms

    151 ms

    Real visitors wait 151 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.08

    0.08

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.08 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 610 ms

    610 ms

    Real visitors wait 610 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 65 ms

    65 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 65 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix55
  • 10 images far larger than shown

    1.0 MB

    10 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example les-fleurs-de-bach-n-71-stress-general_s1.png at 500 px wide, shown at 81 px. Resized copies would save about 1.0 MB.

  • Page weight: 2.8 MB in 66 requests

    2.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.8 MB in 66 requests on a phone: images 1.8 MB (29), scripts 640 KiB (15) and fonts 170 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 16 images in older formats

    16 images (1.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (93 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.78 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.78 g of CO₂e: 93.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8481
  • 7 text elements with low contrast

    7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Links look like plain text

    1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.

  • 12 images without alt text

    12 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

1 checks passed
  • 21 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 28 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 21 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 8591
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 297 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 297 pages on conseilfleursdebach.fr and 8 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 122 characters

    Your meta description is 122 characters: “Fleurs de Bach ? Mariepure a déjà plus de 30 ans d'expérience. Trouvez les fleurs de Bach les mieux appropriées pour vo…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Toutes les infos sur les fleurs de Bach”.

  • Title: 53 characters

    Your title is a healthy 53 characters: “Fleurs de Bach | Conseil fleurs de Bach par Mariepure”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.conseilfleursdebach.fr/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.conseilfleursdebach.fr/sitemap_ssl.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.conseilfleursdebach.fr/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

2 to fix88
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://www.conseilfleursdebach.fr/chercher.htm is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.conseilfleursdebach.fr/chercher.htm has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    https://www.conseilfleursdebach.fr/les-fleurs-de-bach-et-les-enfants/bebe-pleurnicheur.htm and https://www.conseilfleursdebach.fr/les-fleurs-de-bach-et-les-enfants/harcelement-scolaire.htm took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 102 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10087
  • 7 small tap targets

    7 of 21 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://cdn.conseilfleursdebach.fr/bb_2024/css/1756215385.css' from origin 'https://www.co…”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix71
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 143 words

    The homepage has only about 143 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

4 checks passed
  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Contact”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 testimonial or review blocks and 2 customer or partner logos.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 21 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 21 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at conseilfleursdebach.fr, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Combell NV

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on conseilfleursdebach.fr, including 10 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25