Website review, no card needed
contra.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202630 issues · 94 checks
This review found 30 issues worth fixing on contra.com, 10 of them high impact, across 94 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 6.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 6.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 6.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 6.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 6.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 6.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 5.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 842 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 859 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 873 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 855 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 817 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 782 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 742 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 736 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 734 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 712 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 697 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 673 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 644 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 625 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 602 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 583 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 571 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 562 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 557 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 548 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 543 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 552 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 561 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 577 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 590 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
contra.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.3 s · 448 KiBAbout 448 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.
3,216 HTML elements
The page has 3,216 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 1.4 MB27 images could be 1.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 52
52/100Your mobile performance score is 52. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Render-blocking requests
700 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 700 ms.
Main-thread work: 3.2 s
A phone's processor spends 3.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 246 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 12 ms
12 msYour server sent the HTML in 12 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 7.3 s
7.3 sReal visitors wait 7.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 820 ms
820 msReal visitors wait 820 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 7.5 s
7.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 7.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 16.7 s
16.7 sYour largest element takes 16.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 17.1 s
17.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 17.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.6 s
8.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 486 ms
486 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 486 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.2 s
2.2 sThe first text or image appears after 2.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.1 s to 5.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.07
0.07For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.07 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 754 ms
754 msReal visitors wait 754 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 31% faster for real visitors
-31%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 842 ms to 590 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.013
0.013The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.013, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 12.3 MB in 210 requests
12.3 MBYour homepage downloads 12.3 MB in 210 requests on a phone: media 8.0 MB (4), images 2.6 MB (80) and scripts 1.3 MB (118). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
158 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example vg6gxhldhy2rx4n7dfvn at 1,024 px wide, shown at 24 px. Resized copies would save about 158 KiB.
1 image in older formats
1 image (159 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 3.5 g of CO₂ per visit
3.48 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.48 g of CO₂e: 417.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
7 links without text
7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
SVG elements with an img role do not have an accessible text alternative
SVG elements with an img role do not have an accessible text alternative (29 elements).
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with role="none" or role="presentation" have conflicts
Elements with role="none" or role="presentation" have conflicts (3 elements).
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).
1 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 114 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
SEO
Title is long (69 characters)
Your title is 69 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Contra - A professional network for the jobs and skills of the future”.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
13 H1 headlines
There are 13 <h1> headlines (“Get more creative”, “Projects we love” and “Projects we love”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
269 internal links, 24 external
The homepage links to 269 pages on contra.com and 24 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 124 characters
Your meta description is 124 characters: “Connect with next-gen talent and tools to get work underway. Hire more independents. Start more projects. Get more crea…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://contra.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://contra.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,486 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
3 linked pages hidden from search
/p/ZW3rNW2F-no-codesupply-a-store-for-very-good-websites, /p/g3ZmlRcg-untranslated and /p/3erEm76R-lyft-pink are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.
5 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 5 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /paula_gibert_3hfzq7lb, whose canonical is /paula_gibert_3hfzq7lb/work. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 114 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
113 of 128 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://instagram.com/contra.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
8 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (contra.com).
Valid certificate (72 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE2 verifies for contra.com and is valid for another 72 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://contra.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 53 links work
All 53 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 13 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
DNSSEC is off
contra.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
3 checks passed
Domain is 30 years old
30 yearscontra.com was registered in Jun 1996 through Cloudflare, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Certificate issuers are restricted
CAA records allow only comodoca.com, digicert.com, letsencrypt.org and pki.goog to issue certificates for contra.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.
Registered until Jun 2035
contra.com is registered until Jun 2035.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 7 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 2,177 words of copy
The homepage carries about 2,177 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Sign up”.
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Sign up” and “Contact support”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 2 email links.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 85/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net include:39624632.spf03.hubspotemail.net ~all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
4 cookies set on arrival
4Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Hiring
- Hiring
- 7 open roles
- Teams
- Contra Labs (7)
- Job board
- ashby
- Careers page
- contra.com/careers (opens in a new tab)
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 30 issues on contra.com, including 15 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.