Website review, no card needed

coro.net logo

coro.net website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202649 issues · 90 checks

This review found 49 issues worth fixing on coro.net, 21 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.7 s2.1 sMay 16Oct 313.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.0 s
May 23, 20263.1 s
May 30, 20263.1 s
Jun 6, 20263.0 s
Jun 13, 20262.6 s
Jun 20, 20262.3 s
Jun 27, 20262.3 s
Jul 4, 20262.3 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.8 s
Jul 25, 20262.8 s
Aug 1, 20262.8 s
Aug 8, 20262.8 s
Aug 15, 20263.0 s
Aug 22, 20263.1 s
Aug 29, 20263.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.9 s
Sep 12, 20262.7 s
Sep 19, 20262.8 s
Sep 26, 20262.7 s
Oct 3, 20263.1 s
Oct 10, 20263.3 s
Oct 17, 20263.5 s
Oct 24, 20263.4 s
Oct 31, 20263.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
285 ms123 msMay 16Oct 31249 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026169 ms
May 23, 2026152 ms
May 30, 2026151 ms
Jun 6, 2026146 ms
Jun 13, 2026143 ms
Jun 20, 2026146 ms
Jun 27, 2026142 ms
Jul 4, 2026148 ms
Jul 11, 2026152 ms
Jul 18, 2026151 ms
Jul 25, 2026179 ms
Aug 1, 2026170 ms
Aug 8, 2026162 ms
Aug 15, 2026151 ms
Aug 22, 2026143 ms
Aug 29, 2026162 ms
Sep 5, 2026181 ms
Sep 12, 2026178 ms
Sep 19, 2026178 ms
Sep 26, 2026176 ms
Oct 3, 2026182 ms
Oct 10, 2026222 ms
Oct 17, 2026239 ms
Oct 24, 2026266 ms
Oct 31, 2026249 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of coro.net (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. coro.net at 1.6 s1.6 s
  2. coro.net at 3.1 s3.1 s
  3. coro.net at 4.7 s4.7 s
  4. coro.net at 6.3 s6.3 s
  5. coro.net at 7.9 s7.9 s
  6. coro.net at 9.4 s9.4 s
  7. coro.net at 11.0 s11.0 s
  8. coro.net at 12.6 s12.6 s

Speed

14 to fix21
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.8 s

    19 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.8 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.4 s · 1.3 MB

    About 1.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.3 s · 695 KiB

    26 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (695 KiB).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.6 s of main-thread work and 819 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Unpkg adds 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Unpkg costs a phone 1.4 s of main-thread work and 96 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 14.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 14.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 8.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • hsappstatic.net adds 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    hsappstatic.net costs a phone 1.2 s of main-thread work and 715 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 21

    21/100

    Your mobile performance score is 21. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Unpkg and hsappstatic.net and others), adding 3.0 MB and 5.9 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    750 ms · 156 KiB

    About 156 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google CDN adds 603 ms

    603 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 603 ms of main-thread work and 736 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 649 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Hubspot adds 447 ms

    447 ms

    Hubspot costs a phone 447 ms of main-thread work and 306 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,302 HTML elements

    The page has 2,302 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 9 KiB

    9 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    32 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 32 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 16 ms

    16 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 16 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

14 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.7 s

    11.7 s

    Your largest element takes 11.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 30.7 s

    30.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 30.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 4.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 8.2 s

    8.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Real visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 231 ms

    231 ms

    Real visitors wait 231 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.19

    0.19

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.19 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 60% slower for real visitors

    +60%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 169 ms to 249 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.193

    0.193

    The layout shifts by 0.193 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 4.5 MB in 159 requests

    4.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.5 MB in 159 requests on a phone: scripts 3.2 MB (62), other files 843 KiB (50) and stylesheets 248 KiB (20). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.29 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.29 g of CO₂e: 154.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8592
  • Input buttons must have discernible text (1 element)

    Input buttons must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (7 elements)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (51 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 51 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 29 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 8589
  • 3 H1 headlines

    There are 3 <h1> headlines (“Workspace security built for Lean IT teams”, “Cybersecurity Made Easy” and “SE LabsCalls Coro "Outstanding"”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (FAQPage, Organization, SoftwareApplication and WPFooter) but with 1 problem, for example “SoftwareApplication: no offers (price) block”.

  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 170 internal links, 28 external

    The homepage links to 170 pages on coro.net and 28 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 134 characters

    Your meta description is 134 characters: “Cloud-based cybersecurity for every part of your company. We protect email, data, cloud apps, devices, and even users. …”.

  • Title: 48 characters

    Your title is a healthy 48 characters: “Coro | Cybersecurity Made Easy For Lean IT Teams”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.coro.net/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.coro.net/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,666 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.coro.net/llms.txt (12 KiB, 28 links, though it should open with a “# Title” line), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 3 pages share a title

    https://www.coro.net/partners/coro-compass, https://www.coro.net/partners/tsds-agents and https://www.coro.net/partners/software-vendors all use the title “Partner With A Modern Cybersecurity Company | Coro”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 10 pages without a meta description

    https://www.coro.net/platform, https://www.coro.net/platform/modules, https://www.coro.net/integrations, https://www.coro.net/platform/deployment, https://www.coro.net/platform/managed-services and https://www.coro.net/platform/pricing and 4 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages share a meta description

    https://www.coro.net/partners/coro-compass, https://www.coro.net/partners/tsds-agents and https://www.coro.net/partners/software-vendors use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 3 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 3 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.coro.net/integrations, whose canonical is https://www.coro.net/platform/integrations. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 4 pages slow to respond

    https://www.coro.net/platform, https://www.coro.net/integrations, https://www.coro.net/partners/tsds-agents and https://www.coro.net/partners/software-vendors took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 58 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 7370
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=211010448&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=308e6499-70ed-4b26-84ed-9a1e5161c662&bo=1&sid=d3b75680d87211f1a94301bc127e9b36&vid=d3b780b0d87211f190dfbbfd907e2f00&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=9.

  • 4 small tap targets

    4 of 10 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_EMPTY_RESPONSE”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix60
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 23 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,174 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,174 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 9 calls to action

    The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Get Started”, “Pricing” and “Book a live demo”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and HubSpot.

Privacy and tracking

  • 9 trackers load before any consent

    9

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Termly) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 32 cookies set on arrival

    32

    Opening the homepage sets 32 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 52 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 52 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Termly

    A consent management tool (Termly) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at coro.net, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 49 issues on coro.net, including 28 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25