Website review, no card needed

cosabella.fr logo

cosabella.fr website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202636 issues · 84 checks

This review found 36 issues worth fixing on cosabella.fr, 10 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 21.9 MB in 135 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.8 s2.0 sMay 23Nov 72.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20262.6 s
May 30, 20262.6 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.6 s
Jun 20, 20262.7 s
Jun 27, 20262.7 s
Jul 4, 20262.7 s
Jul 11, 20262.7 s
Jul 18, 20262.7 s
Jul 25, 20262.7 s
Aug 1, 20262.7 s
Aug 8, 20262.6 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.6 s
Sep 12, 20262.6 s
Sep 19, 20262.6 s
Sep 26, 20262.5 s
Oct 3, 20262.5 s
Oct 10, 20262.5 s
Oct 17, 20262.4 s
Oct 24, 20262.3 s
Oct 31, 20262.2 s
Nov 7, 20262.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
329 ms148 msMay 23Nov 7294 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026207 ms
May 30, 2026211 ms
Jun 6, 2026212 ms
Jun 13, 2026212 ms
Jun 20, 2026217 ms
Jun 27, 2026221 ms
Jul 4, 2026227 ms
Jul 11, 2026230 ms
Jul 18, 2026230 ms
Jul 25, 2026224 ms
Aug 1, 2026213 ms
Aug 8, 2026203 ms
Aug 15, 2026184 ms
Aug 22, 2026169 ms
Aug 29, 2026179 ms
Sep 5, 2026228 ms
Sep 12, 2026267 ms
Sep 19, 2026286 ms
Sep 26, 2026303 ms
Oct 3, 2026298 ms
Oct 10, 2026308 ms
Oct 17, 2026306 ms
Oct 24, 2026301 ms
Oct 31, 2026299 ms
Nov 7, 2026294 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of cosabella.fr (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. cosabella.fr at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. cosabella.fr at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. cosabella.fr at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. cosabella.fr at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. cosabella.fr at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. cosabella.fr at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. cosabella.fr at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. cosabella.fr at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

8 to fix71
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.3 s · 276 KiB

    About 276 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.4 s

    10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, searchspring.io and Shopify and others), adding 21.1 MB and 263 ms of main-thread time.

  • Shopify adds 71 ms

    71 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 71 ms of main-thread work and 20.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 71

    71/100

    Your mobile performance score is 71. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    500 ms · 168 KiB

    18 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (168 KiB).

  • 2,267 HTML elements

    The page has 2,267 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Main-thread work: 2.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 754 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    280 ms · 66 KiB

    About 66 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 280 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    130 ms · 25 KiB

    25 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 94 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    35 KiB

    2 images could be 35 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 17 ms

    17 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 17 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 9.2 s

    9.2 s

    Your largest element takes 9.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Placeholder”.

  • Time to Interactive: 9.3 s

    9.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 9.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Real visitors wait 2.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 207 ms

    207 ms

    Real visitors wait 207 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.13

    0.13

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.13 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 42% slower for real visitors

    +42%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 207 ms to 294 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Speed Index: 5.1 s

    5.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 10 images without width and height

    10 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

6 checks passed
  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 643 ms

    643 ms

    Real visitors wait 643 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 17% faster for real visitors

    -17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.043

    0.043

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.043, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 58 ms

    58 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 58 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 21.9 MB in 135 requests

    21.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 21.9 MB in 135 requests on a phone: media 20.4 MB (2), scripts 790 KiB (67) and images 315 KiB (28). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 6.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    6.22 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.22 g of CO₂e: 746.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 8389
  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (6 elements)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 5 buttons without a name

    5 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings should not be empty (8 elements)

    Headings should not be empty: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (7 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (7 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 139 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 50 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9284
  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Dolce, Back by Popular Demand” and “Our Most-LovedItalian Lace”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (216 characters)

    Your meta description is 216 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: logo is not an absolute URL ("//cosabella.com/cdn/shop/files/bow_trans_167x167.png?v=…”.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 161 internal links, 14 external

    The homepage links to 161 pages on cosabella.fr and 14 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Title: 54 characters

    Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “Cosabella - Luxury Sexy Lingerie, Bras, Panties & More”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://cosabella.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://cosabella.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,216 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://cosabella.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 page without an H1

    https://cosabella.com/pages/bellissima-rewards has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 74 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 4 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 4 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 21 small tap targets

    21 of 49 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix90
  • A 42-field form

    Your longest form asks for 42 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 699 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 699 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SHOP NEW” and “SHOP DOLCE”.

  • 31 calls to action

    The homepage has 31 calls to action, for example “Shop New”, “Shop All New” and “Shop All Bras”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 34 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity and TikTok Pixel.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo, Meta Pixel and Pinterest Tag (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 19 cookies set on arrival

    19

    Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 22 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 22 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at cosabella.fr, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 12 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Pandectes Gdpr · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Attentive · Gdpr Cookie Consent · Aiod Automatic Discounts · activatedapps.com · nfcube.com · pepperjam.com · global-e.com · rise-ai.com · cloudfront.net · attn.tv

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 36 issues on cosabella.fr, including 17 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25