Website review, no card needed
costa-verde.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202641 issues · 104 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on costa-verde.com, 17 of them high impact, across 104 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
72C- #62,652 of 81,523 reviewed websitesbeats 20%
- #34,133 of 40,367 online storesbeats 13%
- #1,395 of 2,109 WooCommerce storesbeats 29%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 146 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 149 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 151 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 147 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 171 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.8 s
1.6 s
2.4 s
3.3 s
4.1 s
4.9 s
5.7 s
6.5 s
costa-verde.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Render-blocking requests
2.3 s37 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.1 s · 883 KiBAbout 883 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 43
43/100Your mobile performance score is 43 (desktop: 57). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.2 s
A phone's processor spends 4.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Facebook and others), adding 1.8 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.
Font display
850 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 850 ms).
Google Tag Manager adds 637 ms
637 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 637 ms of main-thread work and 707 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 77 KiBAbout 77 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Google CDN adds 295 ms
295 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 295 ms of main-thread work and 734 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
16 long tasks on the main thread
16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 358 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
228 KiB6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (228 KiB).
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Improve image delivery
34 KiB2 images could be 34 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Legacy JavaScript
12 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify CSS
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 3 ms
3 msYour server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user TTFB: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors wait 2.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 8.4 s
8.4 sYour largest element takes 8.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Mistletoe”. Most of its time is resource load delay (5.4 s).
Speed Index: 13.5 s
13.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 13.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 20.6 s
20.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 20.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 744 ms
744 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 744 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.5 s
3.5 sReal visitors wait 3.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.9 s
2.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s
2.9 sThe first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
17 images without width and height
17 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 16% slower for real visitors
+16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 146 ms to 171 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 197 ms
197 msReal visitors wait 197 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.2 MB in 164 requests
5.2 MBYour homepage downloads 5.2 MB in 164 requests on a phone: images 2.2 MB (32), scripts 2.0 MB (73) and fonts 427 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit
1.47 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.47 g of CO₂e: 175.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
29 text elements with low contrast
29 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (8 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
9 links without text
9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (3 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
51 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (25 characters)
Your title is only 25 characters: “Costa Verde | Loja Online”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
3 links crawlers can't follow
3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
84 internal links, 16 external
The homepage links to 84 pages on costa-verde.com and 16 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 131 characters
Your meta description is 131 characters: “Visite a loja online Costa Verde, aceda às nossas coleções e produtos, saiba onde pode comprar os nossos artigos e visi…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://costa-verde.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://costa-verde.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (742 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
/carrinho-costa-verde is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /visita-virtual, whose canonical is /fr?page_id=49334. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
10 pages slow to respond
/loja-online, /colecoes-costa-verde, /colecoes-moods, /colecoes-gift, /sustentabilidade and /sustentabilidade/inovacao and 4 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 52 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
12 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Every page has a meta description
All 11 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
Every page has a title
All 11 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
57 of 64 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
6 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (costa-verde.com).
Valid certificate (65 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for costa-verde.com and is valid for another 65 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
http:// redirects to https
http://costa-verde.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 54 links work
All 54 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 14 external) answered without errors; 1 did not answer within 5 s.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
costa-verde.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
costa-verde.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 26 years old
26 yearscosta-verde.com was registered in Oct 2000 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Oct 2028
costa-verde.com is registered until Oct 2028.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 553 words of copy
The homepage carries about 553 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
3 checks passed
2 short forms
2 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo and 2 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.
Email authentication
No DMARC policy
costa-verde.com has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.
Email authentication score: 50/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 a mx ip4:51.255.161.198 ip6:2a03:4000:63:f9f:587b:d9ff:fe79:5714 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “mail”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
14 cookies set on arrival
14Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
17 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 41 issues on costa-verde.com, including 20 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.