Website review, no card needed

cotesushi.com logo

cotesushi.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202639 issues · 105 checks

This review found 39 issues worth fixing on cotesushi.com, 12 of them high impact, across 105 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.0 s859 msMay 9Oct 24998 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.0 s
May 16, 2026971 ms
May 23, 2026940 ms
May 30, 2026906 ms
Jun 6, 2026888 ms
Jun 13, 2026894 ms
Jun 20, 2026901 ms
Jun 27, 2026907 ms
Jul 4, 2026905 ms
Jul 11, 2026901 ms
Jul 18, 2026894 ms
Jul 25, 2026902 ms
Aug 1, 2026893 ms
Aug 8, 2026896 ms
Aug 15, 2026890 ms
Aug 22, 2026878 ms
Aug 29, 2026894 ms
Sep 5, 2026914 ms
Sep 12, 2026930 ms
Sep 19, 2026952 ms
Sep 26, 2026980 ms
Oct 3, 2026995 ms
Oct 10, 20261.0 s
Oct 17, 20261.0 s
Oct 24, 2026998 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
136 ms120 msMay 9Oct 24133 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026124 ms
May 16, 2026123 ms
May 23, 2026122 ms
May 30, 2026122 ms
Jun 6, 2026124 ms
Jun 13, 2026125 ms
Jun 20, 2026127 ms
Jun 27, 2026129 ms
Jul 4, 2026129 ms
Jul 11, 2026130 ms
Jul 18, 2026129 ms
Jul 25, 2026128 ms
Aug 1, 2026127 ms
Aug 8, 2026126 ms
Aug 15, 2026128 ms
Aug 22, 2026129 ms
Aug 29, 2026130 ms
Sep 5, 2026132 ms
Sep 12, 2026130 ms
Sep 19, 2026132 ms
Sep 26, 2026132 ms
Oct 3, 2026132 ms
Oct 10, 2026134 ms
Oct 17, 2026133 ms
Oct 24, 2026133 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of cotesushi.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. cotesushi.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. cotesushi.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. cotesushi.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. cotesushi.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. cotesushi.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. cotesushi.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. cotesushi.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. cotesushi.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

cotesushi.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

12 to fix35
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.9 s

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 35

    35/100

    Your mobile performance score is 35. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    950 ms · 678 KiB

    11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (678 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    1.4 MB

    18 images could be 1.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Mapbox, Google Maps and Clarity and others), adding 2.0 MB and 905 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 700 KiB

    About 700 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mapbox adds 604 ms

    604 ms

    Mapbox costs a phone 604 ms of main-thread work and 1.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 17 long tasks on the main thread

    17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 604 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    480 ms · 60 KiB

    About 60 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 480 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2,803 HTML elements

    The page has 2,803 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Google Maps adds 124 ms

    124 ms

    Google Maps costs a phone 124 ms of main-thread work and 393 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    150 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    18 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 18 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 6 ms

    6 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 13.1 s

    13.1 s

    Your largest element takes 13.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “L’ART CULINAIRE NIKKEI From Japan to Peru Découvrir notre c…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 23.2 s

    23.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 23.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.4 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 8.6 s

    8.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 42 images without width and height

    42 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 124 ms to 133 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.0 s to 1.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 172 ms

    172 ms

    Real visitors wait 172 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 689 ms

    689 ms

    Real visitors wait 689 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.035

    0.035

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.035, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix53
  • Page weight: 13.5 MB in 152 requests

    13.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 13.5 MB in 152 requests on a phone: media 7.5 MB (1), images 2.8 MB (76) and scripts 1.5 MB (24). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 10 images far larger than shown

    419 KiB

    10 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 3.webp at 960 px wide, shown at 133 px. Resized copies would save about 419 KiB.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (343 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 3.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.84 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.84 g of CO₂e: 460.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8693
  • 20 text elements with low contrast

    20 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Hidden but focusable

    3 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (53 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 53 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 10 form fields without a label

    10 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h5, h2 → h5 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 311 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9295
  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 98 internal links, 65 external

    The homepage links to 98 pages on cotesushi.com and 65 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 127 characters

    Your meta description is 127 characters: “Côté Sushi : craquez pour nos sushis, makis et California. Commandez en ligne ou sur l’application et profitez de la li…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “NIKKEI”.

  • Title: 59 characters

    Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “Côté Sushi, livraison de sushis, makis, restaurant japonais”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://cotesushi.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: FAQPage, MobileApplication, Organization and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://cotesushi.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,386 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 41 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 1 page that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 1 page that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9679
  • 31 small tap targets

    31 of 68 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Scrolls sideways on phones

    On a 390 px-wide phone the page scrolls sideways, a sign that something is wider than the screen.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix86
  • 1 broken external link

    1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://cotesushi.go.link/?adj_t=1sl8h8p5 (404).

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • Short HSTS lifetime

    HSTS is set, but max-age is 180 days; one year is the recommended minimum.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

5 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (cotesushi.com).

  • Valid certificate (79 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for cotesushi.com and is valid for another 79 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://cotesushi.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

  • DNSSEC is off

    cotesushi.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 18 years old

    18 years

    cotesushi.com was registered in Jan 2008 through OVH sas. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Certificate issuers are restricted

    CAA records allow only letsencrypt.org, comodoca.com, digicert.com and ssl.com to issue certificates for cotesushi.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.

  • Registered until Jan 2032

    cotesushi.com is registered until Jan 2032.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 2,003 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 2,003 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo, a star rating and 2 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Email authentication

1 to fix70
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be cotesushi.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.

  • Email authentication score: 70/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:mx.ovh.com include:spf.sendinblue.com a:smtp5.silae.fr include:spf.protection.outlook.com mx ~all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “mail”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 12 cookies set on arrival

    12

    Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 24 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 24 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Cloudflare

Company

Founded
2010
Headquarters
Paris

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 39 issues on cotesushi.com, including 18 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25