Website review, no card needed

craftmakerscollective.com logo

craftmakerscollective.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202641 issues · 84 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on craftmakerscollective.com, 10 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.8 s1.3 sMay 23Nov 71.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20261.4 s
May 30, 20261.4 s
Jun 6, 20261.4 s
Jun 13, 20261.5 s
Jun 20, 20261.4 s
Jun 27, 20261.5 s
Jul 4, 20261.5 s
Jul 11, 20261.6 s
Jul 18, 20261.7 s
Jul 25, 20261.7 s
Aug 1, 20261.7 s
Aug 8, 20261.6 s
Aug 15, 20261.6 s
Aug 22, 20261.5 s
Aug 29, 20261.6 s
Sep 5, 20261.5 s
Sep 12, 20261.5 s
Sep 19, 20261.4 s
Sep 26, 20261.3 s
Oct 3, 20261.3 s
Oct 10, 20261.3 s
Oct 17, 20261.4 s
Oct 24, 20261.4 s
Oct 31, 20261.4 s
Nov 7, 20261.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
147 ms131 msMay 23Nov 7138 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026135 ms
May 30, 2026137 ms
Jun 6, 2026137 ms
Jun 13, 2026139 ms
Jun 20, 2026137 ms
Jun 27, 2026135 ms
Jul 4, 2026135 ms
Jul 11, 2026135 ms
Jul 18, 2026137 ms
Jul 25, 2026142 ms
Aug 1, 2026141 ms
Aug 8, 2026143 ms
Aug 15, 2026139 ms
Aug 22, 2026137 ms
Aug 29, 2026141 ms
Sep 5, 2026138 ms
Sep 12, 2026137 ms
Sep 19, 2026133 ms
Sep 26, 2026135 ms
Oct 3, 2026135 ms
Oct 10, 2026139 ms
Oct 17, 2026144 ms
Oct 24, 2026145 ms
Oct 31, 2026142 ms
Nov 7, 2026138 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of craftmakerscollective.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. craftmakerscollective.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. craftmakerscollective.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  3. craftmakerscollective.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  4. craftmakerscollective.com at 3.6 s3.6 s
  5. craftmakerscollective.com at 4.6 s4.6 s
  6. craftmakerscollective.com at 5.5 s5.5 s
  7. craftmakerscollective.com at 6.4 s6.4 s
  8. craftmakerscollective.com at 7.3 s7.3 s

Speed

9 to fix62
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.5 s · 823 KiB

    About 823 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    14.2 MB

    9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (14.2 MB).

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, piwik.pro and cookieinformation.com and others), adding 16.7 MB and 631 ms of main-thread time.

  • unibrew.com adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    unibrew.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 15.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 62

    62/100

    Your mobile performance score is 62. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • YouTube adds 530 ms

    530 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 530 ms of main-thread work and 1,009 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    500 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 500 ms).

  • Main-thread work: 2.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 1,513 HTML elements

    The page has 1,513 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Render-blocking requests

    250 ms

    15 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 250 ms.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 110 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    87 KiB

    About 87 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    22 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 22 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 83 ms

    83 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 83 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.3 s

    10.3 s

    Your largest element takes 10.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image. Most of its time is resource load delay (5.2 s).

  • Speed Index: 12.6 s

    12.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 16.1 s

    16.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 135 ms to 138 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 160 ms

    160 ms

    Real visitors wait 160 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 501 ms

    501 ms

    Real visitors wait 501 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 105 ms

    105 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 105 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.009

    0.009

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.009, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix53
  • Page weight: 17.3 MB in 97 requests

    17.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 17.3 MB in 97 requests on a phone: media 14.2 MB (8), scripts 1.4 MB (34) and images 1.3 MB (19). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    smukfest_2023_recap_v200_00_28_15still003.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    399 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 20180827_oly00180_1.jpg at 2,880 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 399 KiB.

  • About 4.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.91 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.91 g of CO₂e: 588.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8392
  • 11 buttons without a name

    11 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (4 elements)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (68 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 68 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (3 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 71 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 7 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 9272
  • Title is short (13 characters)

    Your title is only 13 characters: “Royal Unibrew”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 12 H1 headlines

    There are 12 <h1> headlines (“Royal Unibrew og Tivoli forlænger partnerskab”, “46 år sammen: Smukfest og Royal Unibrew fortsætte…” and “Faxe Kondi og Uno-X Mobility Cycling indgår partn…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (276 characters)

    Your meta description is 276 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 51 internal links, 18 external

    The homepage links to 51 pages on craftmakerscollective.com and 18 external pages.

2 checks passed
  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://royalunibrew.dk/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://royalunibrew.dk/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (774 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix88
  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://royalunibrew.dk/nyheder/pressekontakt has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages share a meta description

    https://royalunibrew.dk/karriere, https://royalunibrew.dk/karriere/karriere-i-royal-unibrew and https://royalunibrew.dk/karriere/internationale-karrieremuligheder use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    https://royalunibrew.dk/brands, https://royalunibrew.dk/brands/oel, https://royalunibrew.dk/brands/laeskedrikke, https://royalunibrew.dk/brands/rtd-cider-cocktails, https://royalunibrew.dk/brands/energi-funktionelle-drikke and https://royalunibrew.dk/brands/egekilde and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 26 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 7370
  • 2 broken images

    2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.royalunibrew.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/RoyalUnibrew_logo.png.

  • 20 small tap targets

    20 of 46 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 880 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 880 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “[email protected]”.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 11 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at craftmakerscollective.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2025.

Stack

Framework
Next.js
E-commerce
Shopify;Shopify Plus
Hosting
Datacenter Luxembourg S.A.

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on craftmakerscollective.com, including 13 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25