Website review, no card needed
craftmakerscollective.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202641 issues · 84 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on craftmakerscollective.com, 10 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
78C- #55,323 of 108,860 reviewed websitesbeats 44%
- #36,257 of 61,765 online storesbeats 36%
- #34,680 of 56,365 Shopify storesbeats 33%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 1.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 135 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 138 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.9 s
1.8 s
2.7 s
3.6 s
4.6 s
5.5 s
6.4 s
7.3 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.5 s · 823 KiBAbout 823 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
14.2 MB9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (14.2 MB).
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, piwik.pro and cookieinformation.com and others), adding 16.7 MB and 631 ms of main-thread time.
unibrew.com adds 0 ms
0 msunibrew.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 15.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 62
62/100Your mobile performance score is 62. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
YouTube adds 530 ms
530 msYouTube costs a phone 530 ms of main-thread work and 1,009 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
500 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 500 ms).
Main-thread work: 2.8 s
A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
1,513 HTML elements
The page has 1,513 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Render-blocking requests
250 ms15 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 250 ms.
5 long tasks on the main thread
5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 110 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
87 KiBAbout 87 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Legacy JavaScript
22 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 22 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
1 checks passed
Server response: 83 ms
83 msYour server sent the HTML in 83 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 10.3 s
10.3 sYour largest element takes 10.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image. Most of its time is resource load delay (5.2 s).
Speed Index: 12.6 s
12.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 16.1 s
16.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 16.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.2 s
2.2 sThe first text or image appears after 2.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 135 ms to 138 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 160 ms
160 msReal visitors wait 160 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 501 ms
501 msReal visitors wait 501 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 105 ms
105 msScripts block the page for only 105 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.009
0.009The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.009, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 17.3 MB in 97 requests
17.3 MBYour homepage downloads 17.3 MB in 97 requests on a phone: media 14.2 MB (8), scripts 1.4 MB (34) and images 1.3 MB (19). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
smukfest_2023_recap_v200_00_28_15still003.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
3 images far larger than shown
399 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 20180827_oly00180_1.jpg at 2,880 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 399 KiB.
About 4.9 g of CO₂ per visit
4.91 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.91 g of CO₂e: 588.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
11 buttons without a name
11 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (4 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (68 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 68 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (3 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 71 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 7 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (13 characters)
Your title is only 13 characters: “Royal Unibrew”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
12 H1 headlines
There are 12 <h1> headlines (“Royal Unibrew og Tivoli forlænger partnerskab”, “46 år sammen: Smukfest og Royal Unibrew fortsætte…” and “Faxe Kondi og Uno-X Mobility Cycling indgår partn…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
Meta description is long (276 characters)
Your meta description is 276 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
51 internal links, 18 external
The homepage links to 51 pages on craftmakerscollective.com and 18 external pages.
2 checks passed
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://royalunibrew.dk/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://royalunibrew.dk/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (774 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
https://royalunibrew.dk/nyheder/pressekontakt has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 pages share a meta description
https://royalunibrew.dk/karriere, https://royalunibrew.dk/karriere/karriere-i-royal-unibrew and https://royalunibrew.dk/karriere/internationale-karrieremuligheder use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
15 pages without an H1
https://royalunibrew.dk/brands, https://royalunibrew.dk/brands/oel, https://royalunibrew.dk/brands/laeskedrikke, https://royalunibrew.dk/brands/rtd-cider-cocktails, https://royalunibrew.dk/brands/energi-funktionelle-drikke and https://royalunibrew.dk/brands/egekilde and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 26 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 broken images
2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.royalunibrew.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/RoyalUnibrew_logo.png.
20 small tap targets
20 of 46 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 880 words of copy
The homepage carries about 880 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “[email protected]”.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
11 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at craftmakerscollective.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2025.
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- E-commerce
- Shopify;Shopify Plus
- Hosting
- Datacenter Luxembourg S.A.
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on craftmakerscollective.com, including 13 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.