Programmable

Website review, no card needed

crocodic.com logo

crocodic.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202616 issues · 80 checks

This review found 16 issues worth fixing on crocodic.com, 6 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Site score

82B

Closest competitors among reviewed websites

Compare side by side
Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.6 s908 msMay 2Oct 173.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.9 s
May 9, 20262.9 s
May 16, 20263.1 s
May 23, 20263.4 s
May 30, 20263.4 s
Jun 6, 20263.3 s
Jun 13, 20262.8 s
Jun 20, 20263.9 s
Jun 27, 20264.7 s
Jul 4, 20265.0 s
Jul 11, 20265.1 s
Jul 18, 20265.0 s
Jul 25, 20264.7 s
Aug 1, 20261.7 s
Aug 8, 20261.6 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.6 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.6 s
Sep 12, 20261.5 s
Sep 19, 20261.5 s
Sep 26, 20261.4 s
Oct 3, 20261.5 s
Oct 10, 20262.4 s
Oct 17, 20263.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
285 ms95 msMay 2Oct 17263 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026191 ms
May 9, 2026213 ms
May 16, 2026203 ms
May 23, 2026230 ms
May 30, 2026241 ms
Jun 6, 2026197 ms
Jun 13, 2026222 ms
Jun 20, 2026237 ms
Jun 27, 2026242 ms
Jul 4, 2026240 ms
Jul 11, 2026235 ms
Jul 18, 2026212 ms
Jul 25, 2026171 ms
Aug 1, 2026121 ms
Aug 8, 2026124 ms
Aug 15, 2026138 ms
Aug 22, 2026141 ms
Aug 29, 2026128 ms
Sep 5, 2026128 ms
Sep 12, 2026117 ms
Sep 19, 2026124 ms
Sep 26, 2026138 ms
Oct 3, 2026138 ms
Oct 10, 2026195 ms
Oct 17, 2026263 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

crocodic.com (opens in a new tab)
Live view · interaction off

Speed

1 to fix98

  • Render-blocking requests

    300 ms

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 300 ms.

  • Improve image delivery

    15 KiB

    2 images could be 15 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

3 checks passed

  • Mobile performance score: 98

    98/100

    Your mobile performance score is 98 (desktop: 83). That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).

  • Main-thread work: 0.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 12 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 17 ms

    17 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 17 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix50

  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Real visitors wait 3.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Speed Index: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 13% slower for real visitors

    +13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 191 ms to 263 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Your largest element renders in 1.8 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Bangun sistem Enterprise yang berdampak pada bisnis dan ter…”.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • First Contentful Paint: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 0.9 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    The page is fully interactive after 1.8 s.

Images and page weight

100

  • About 0.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.13 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.13 g of CO₂e: 15.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed

  • Page weight: 477 KiB in 27 requests

    477 KiB

    Your homepage downloads 477 KiB in 27 requests on a phone: images 240 KiB (10), fonts 151 KiB (4) and scripts 38 KiB (4). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

Google 100100
2 checks passed

  • Every image has alt text

    All 28 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 35 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 35 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 35 passed and 0 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

Google 100100

  • 33 internal links, 19 external

    The homepage links to 33 pages on crocodic.com and 19 external pages.

8 checks passed

  • Meta description: 149 characters

    Your meta description is 149 characters: “Crocodic membangun custom software enterprise, ERP dengan AI untuk bisnis Indonesia. Sistem adaptif, 320+ klien terbant…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Bangun sistem Enterprise yang berdampak pada bisnis dan terintegrasi AI”.

  • Title: 50 characters

    Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “Software House untuk Enterprise Software, ERP & AI”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://crocodic.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, FAQPage, HowTo, Organization and WebPage.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://crocodic.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed

  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,226 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (195 KiB, 598 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95

  • 2 pages without an H1

    /privacy-policy and /terms-of-services have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 11 internal pages checked

    We fetched 11 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed

  • Linked pages load

    All 11 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 11 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 11 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687

  • 4 small tap targets

    4 of 12 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

1 checks passed

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix86

  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

5 checks passed

  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (crocodic.com).

  • Valid certificate (44 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR1 verifies for crocodic.com and is valid for another 44 days.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://crocodic.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 27 links work

    All 27 links checked from your homepage (12 internal, 15 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

1 to fix

  • Domain expires in 32 days

    crocodic.com is registered until Nov 2026. Make sure auto-renew is on and the card on file is current.

  • No CAA record

    crocodic.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    crocodic.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

1 checks passed

  • Domain is 13 years old

    13 years

    crocodic.com was registered in Nov 2012 through CV. Jogjacamp. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

Content and conversion

2 to fix60

  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,087 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,087 words of visible text.

3 checks passed

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 35 testimonial or review blocks, 17 customer or partner logos and 2 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

Email authentication

2 to fix35

  • No SPF record

    crocodic.com has no SPF record, so mail servers can't tell which servers may send email as you. Your mail lands in spam more often, and anyone can send mail pretending to be you.

  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be crocodic.com is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.

  • Email authentication score: 35/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

1 checks passed

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “k2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

1 checks passed

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

  • It runs WordPress 6.9.10; the current release is 7.1.3.
  • 3 plugins are behind their latest release.all-in-one-seo-pack 5.0.2 → 5.0.3 · translatepress-multilingual 3.3.7 → 3.3.8 · elementor 3.35.7 → 4.3.5

Stack

CMS
WordPress 6.9.10
Analytics
Google Analytics | Hotjar

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 16 issues on crocodic.com, including 6 speed issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25