Website review, no card needed
danucem.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202640 issues · 105 checks
This review found 40 issues worth fixing on danucem.com, 15 of them high impact, across 105 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 150 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 152 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 144 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.2 s
1.8 s
2.4 s
3.0 s
3.6 s
4.2 s
4.8 s
danucem.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Improve image delivery
6.3 s · 3.7 MB12 images could be 3.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.3 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.9 s33 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.9 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.1 s · 376 KiBAbout 376 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 49
49/100Your mobile performance score is 49. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, edgly.net and FontAwesome CDN and others), adding 991 KiB and 695 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 610 ms
610 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 610 ms of main-thread work and 658 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 44 KiBAbout 44 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 2.1 s
A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 747 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 long tasks on the main thread
8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 225 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 12 KiB12 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 8 KiB8 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
4 KiB2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4 KiB).
Duplicated JavaScript
2 KiB2 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
1 checks passed
Server response: 61 ms
61 msYour server sent the HTML in 61 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors wait 2.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 38.5 s
38.5 sYour largest element takes 38.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “This Site uses cookies. A cookie is a small amount of data …”.
Time to Interactive: 40.3 s
40.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 40.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 11.0 s
11.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.8 s
3.8 sReal visitors wait 3.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Total Blocking Time: 535 ms
535 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 535 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s
2.4 sThe first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
8 images without width and height
8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 150 ms to 144 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.0 s to 3.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 144 ms
144 msReal visitors wait 144 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 10.4 MB in 103 requests
10.4 MBYour homepage downloads 10.4 MB in 103 requests on a phone: images 9.1 MB (37), scripts 957 KiB (27) and fonts 179 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images in older formats
2 images (516 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (470 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.9 g of CO₂ per visit
2.94 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.94 g of CO₂e: 352.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
6 links without text
6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Headings should not be empty (4 elements)
Headings should not be empty: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (3 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
28 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 32 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 28 passed and 4 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is long (69 characters)
Your title is 69 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Danucem – built on responsibility | Danucem – built on responsibility”.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.danucem.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
8 links with vague text
8 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
5 links crawlers can't follow
5 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
211 internal links, 11 external
The homepage links to 211 pages on danucem.com and 11 external pages.
3 checks passed
Meta description: 133 characters
Your meta description is 133 characters: “As a responsible supplier of construction materials, we strive to ensure your buildings grow with safety and the enviro…”.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,609 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
3 pages share a meta description
/partner-zone/documents, /for-media and /contact/cement use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
3 pages without an H1
/sk, /hu and /at have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages slow to respond
/contact/cement and /p/3/cem-i-42-5-n-sr-0 took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 153 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
9 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 9 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 9 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
10 broken images
10 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.danucem.com/web/images/danucem-logo.svg.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 429 ()”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
46 of 47 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://crhslovakia.com/kariera/.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
8 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (danucem.com).
Valid certificate (35 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for danucem.com and is valid for another 35 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://danucem.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 48 links work
All 48 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 8 external) answered without errors; 4 did not answer within 5 s.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
danucem.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
danucem.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 8 years old
8 yearsdanucem.com was registered in Oct 2018 through Gransy, s.r.o.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Oct 2027
danucem.com is registered until Oct 2027.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 632 words of copy
The homepage carries about 632 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact”.
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Contact”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 4 email links.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 100/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 a:mail.maptq.com include:_spf.crh.com include:spf.mail.aas.services include:_spf.m1.websupport.sk -all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1” and “k2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
10 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- WebSupport s.r.o.
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 40 issues on danucem.com, including 18 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.