Website review, no card needed

danucem.com logo

danucem.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202640 issues · 105 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on danucem.com, 15 of them high impact, across 105 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.4 s3.5 sMay 16Oct 313.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20264.0 s
May 23, 20263.8 s
May 30, 20263.7 s
Jun 6, 20263.6 s
Jun 13, 20263.6 s
Jun 20, 20263.8 s
Jun 27, 20263.9 s
Jul 4, 20264.0 s
Jul 11, 20263.9 s
Jul 18, 20263.8 s
Jul 25, 20263.8 s
Aug 1, 20263.8 s
Aug 8, 20263.8 s
Aug 15, 20263.9 s
Aug 22, 20264.0 s
Aug 29, 20264.1 s
Sep 5, 20264.2 s
Sep 12, 20264.3 s
Sep 19, 20264.2 s
Sep 26, 20264.2 s
Oct 3, 20264.3 s
Oct 10, 20264.2 s
Oct 17, 20264.2 s
Oct 24, 20264.1 s
Oct 31, 20263.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
162 ms142 msMay 16Oct 31144 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026150 ms
May 23, 2026152 ms
May 30, 2026147 ms
Jun 6, 2026145 ms
Jun 13, 2026149 ms
Jun 20, 2026152 ms
Jun 27, 2026153 ms
Jul 4, 2026153 ms
Jul 11, 2026148 ms
Jul 18, 2026149 ms
Jul 25, 2026148 ms
Aug 1, 2026150 ms
Aug 8, 2026153 ms
Aug 15, 2026154 ms
Aug 22, 2026154 ms
Aug 29, 2026152 ms
Sep 5, 2026152 ms
Sep 12, 2026152 ms
Sep 19, 2026152 ms
Sep 26, 2026155 ms
Oct 3, 2026160 ms
Oct 10, 2026157 ms
Oct 17, 2026153 ms
Oct 24, 2026150 ms
Oct 31, 2026144 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of danucem.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. danucem.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. danucem.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. danucem.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  4. danucem.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  5. danucem.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  6. danucem.com at 3.6 s3.6 s
  7. danucem.com at 4.2 s4.2 s
  8. danucem.com at 4.8 s4.8 s

danucem.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

8 to fix49
  • Improve image delivery

    6.3 s · 3.7 MB

    12 images could be 3.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.9 s

    33 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.9 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.1 s · 376 KiB

    About 376 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 49

    49/100

    Your mobile performance score is 49. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, edgly.net and FontAwesome CDN and others), adding 991 KiB and 695 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 610 ms

    610 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 610 ms of main-thread work and 658 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 44 KiB

    About 44 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 2.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 747 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 225 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 12 KiB

    12 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 8 KiB

    8 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    4 KiB

    2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4 KiB).

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 61 ms

    61 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 61 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors wait 2.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 38.5 s

    38.5 s

    Your largest element takes 38.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “This Site uses cookies. A cookie is a small amount of data …”.

  • Time to Interactive: 40.3 s

    40.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 40.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 11.0 s

    11.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    Real visitors wait 3.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 535 ms

    535 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 535 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 8 images without width and height

    8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 150 ms to 144 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.0 s to 3.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 144 ms

    144 ms

    Real visitors wait 144 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix53
  • Page weight: 10.4 MB in 103 requests

    10.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 10.4 MB in 103 requests on a phone: images 9.1 MB (37), scripts 957 KiB (27) and fonts 179 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (516 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (470 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.94 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.94 g of CO₂e: 352.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 8791
  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Headings should not be empty (4 elements)

    Headings should not be empty: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (3 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 28 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 32 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 28 passed and 4 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 7569
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is long (69 characters)

    Your title is 69 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Danucem – built on responsibility | Danucem – built on responsibility”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.danucem.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 8 links with vague text

    8 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 5 links crawlers can't follow

    5 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 211 internal links, 11 external

    The homepage links to 211 pages on danucem.com and 11 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Meta description: 133 characters

    Your meta description is 133 characters: “As a responsible supplier of construction materials, we strive to ensure your buildings grow with safety and the enviro…”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,609 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix93
  • 3 pages share a meta description

    /partner-zone/documents, /for-media and /contact/cement use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    /sk, /hu and /at have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    /contact/cement and /p/3/cem-i-42-5-n-sr-0 took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 153 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    9 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 9 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 9 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9278
  • 10 broken images

    10 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.danucem.com/web/images/danucem-logo.svg.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 429 ()”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    46 of 47 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://crhslovakia.com/kariera/.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (danucem.com).

  • Valid certificate (35 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for danucem.com and is valid for another 35 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://danucem.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 48 links work

    All 48 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 8 external) answered without errors; 4 did not answer within 5 s.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    danucem.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    danucem.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 8 years old

    8 years

    danucem.com was registered in Oct 2018 through Gransy, s.r.o.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Oct 2027

    danucem.com is registered until Oct 2027.

Content and conversion

1 to fix80
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 632 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 632 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact”.

  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Contact”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 4 email links.

Email authentication

100
  • Email authentication score: 100/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 a:mail.maptq.com include:_spf.crh.com include:spf.mail.aas.services include:_spf.m1.websupport.sk -all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1” and “k2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 10 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
WebSupport s.r.o.

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on danucem.com, including 18 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25