Website review, no card needed
daystar.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202622 issues · 95 checks
This review found 22 issues worth fixing on daystar.com, 8 of them high impact, across 95 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
87BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 138 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 134 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 129 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 174 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 151 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.5 s · 459 KiB59 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (459 KiB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
970 ms · 168 KiBAbout 168 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 970 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 61
61/100Your mobile performance score is 61 (desktop: 93). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Render-blocking requests
800 ms21 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 800 ms.
5 third-party services on the page
5 third-party services load with your homepage (Hubspot, Google Tag Manager and hubspotusercontent-na1.net and others), adding 334 KiB and 239 ms of main-thread time.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 13 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
80 KiB4 images could be 80 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 76 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 93 but mobile only 61. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.2 s
A phone's processor spends 1.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 615 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 8 ms
8 msYour server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 11.0 s
11.0 sYour largest element takes 11.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Learn More”.
First Contentful Paint: 4.1 s
4.1 sThe first text or image appears after 4.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 11.1 s
11.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 11.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.6 s
6.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Tap response (INP) got 17% slower for real visitors
+17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 138 ms to 151 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors
+10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 132 ms
132 msReal visitors wait 132 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 624 ms
624 msReal visitors wait 624 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 49 ms
49 msScripts block the page for only 49 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.2 MB in 80 requests
7.2 MBYour homepage downloads 7.2 MB in 80 requests on a phone: media 5.4 MB (1), images 766 KiB (28) and scripts 619 KiB (18). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
Daystar-Television-Network-Leadership-XP-2026-TV-logo.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 2.0 g of CO₂ per visit
2.03 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.03 g of CO₂e: 243.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 22 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
50 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
4 links with vague text
4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
80 internal links, 42 external
The homepage links to 80 pages on daystar.com and 42 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 136 characters
Your meta description is 136 characters: “An award winning, faith-based network dedicated to spreading the Gospel 24/7 – all around the world, through all media …”.
Title: 33 characters
Your title is a healthy 33 characters: “Home | Daystar Television Network”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://daystar.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://daystar.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (729 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
/watch and /support-faq all use the title “Support & FAQ | Daystar Television Network”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
5 pages without an H1
/about, /about-marcus-lamb, /joni, /israel and /satellite-coverage have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 39 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
9 small tap targets
9 of 21 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (daystar.com).
Valid certificate (53 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for daystar.com and is valid for another 53 days.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://daystar.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 59 links work
All 59 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 19 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
daystar.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
daystar.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 31 years old
31 yearsdaystar.com was registered in Mar 1995 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Mar 2033
daystar.com is registered until Mar 2033.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 66 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 859 words of copy
The homepage carries about 859 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn More”.
26 calls to action
The homepage has 26 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Schedule” and “Shop”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and HubSpot.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 95/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:mail.zendesk.com include:sendgrid.net include:servers.mcsv.net ip4:63.147.112.89 include:spf.protection.…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “k2”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and HubSpot (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
15 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
- It loads jQuery 1.7.1, older than 3.5 (which fixed known security holes).
Stack
- CMS
- HubSpot
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- HubSpot
Company
- Founded
- 1997
- Headquarters
- Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 22 issues on daystar.com, including 8 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.