Website review, no card needed

deadline.com logo

deadline.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 October 202639 issues · 111 checks

This review found 39 issues worth fixing on deadline.com, 14 of them high impact, across 111 checks. The most urgent: mobile performance score: 47. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.7 s1.4 sApr 18Oct 31.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20261.5 s
Apr 25, 20261.5 s
May 2, 20261.5 s
May 9, 20261.5 s
May 16, 20261.5 s
May 23, 20261.6 s
May 30, 20261.7 s
Jun 6, 20261.7 s
Jun 13, 20261.7 s
Jun 20, 20261.6 s
Jun 27, 20261.6 s
Jul 4, 20261.6 s
Jul 11, 20261.6 s
Jul 18, 20261.6 s
Jul 25, 20261.6 s
Aug 1, 20261.6 s
Aug 8, 20261.6 s
Aug 15, 20261.5 s
Aug 22, 20261.5 s
Aug 29, 20261.5 s
Sep 5, 20261.5 s
Sep 12, 20261.5 s
Sep 19, 20261.5 s
Sep 26, 20261.5 s
Oct 3, 20261.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
201 ms129 msApr 18Oct 3144 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026193 ms
Apr 25, 2026185 ms
May 2, 2026174 ms
May 9, 2026166 ms
May 16, 2026153 ms
May 23, 2026154 ms
May 30, 2026153 ms
Jun 6, 2026146 ms
Jun 13, 2026145 ms
Jun 20, 2026137 ms
Jun 27, 2026139 ms
Jul 4, 2026146 ms
Jul 11, 2026149 ms
Jul 18, 2026154 ms
Jul 25, 2026153 ms
Aug 1, 2026152 ms
Aug 8, 2026151 ms
Aug 15, 2026146 ms
Aug 22, 2026143 ms
Aug 29, 2026145 ms
Sep 5, 2026145 ms
Sep 12, 2026144 ms
Sep 19, 2026146 ms
Sep 26, 2026143 ms
Oct 3, 2026144 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of deadline.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. deadline.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. deadline.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  3. deadline.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  4. deadline.com at 4.0 s4.0 s
  5. deadline.com at 5.0 s5.0 s
  6. deadline.com at 6.0 s6.0 s
  7. deadline.com at 7.0 s7.0 s
  8. deadline.com at 7.9 s7.9 s

deadline.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

12 to fix47
  • Mobile performance score: 47

    47/100

    Your mobile performance score is 47. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 9.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 9.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Ad Lightning, Google/Doubleclick Ads and Optanon and others), adding 2.5 MB and 2.0 s of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.8 MB

    179 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.8 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1,024 KiB

    About 1,024 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 555 ms

    555 ms

    Google/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 555 ms of main-thread work and 867 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Ad Lightning adds 555 ms

    555 ms

    Ad Lightning costs a phone 555 ms of main-thread work and 248 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 253 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Optanon adds 196 ms

    196 ms

    Optanon costs a phone 196 ms of main-thread work and 323 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,101 HTML elements

    The page has 2,101 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • blogherads.com adds 137 ms

    137 ms

    blogherads.com costs a phone 137 ms of main-thread work and 569 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 137 ms

    137 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 137 ms of main-thread work and 308 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    250 ms

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 250 ms.

  • Improve image delivery

    196 KiB

    8 images could be 196 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    153 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 153 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    96 KiB

    About 96 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 65 ms

    65 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 65 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 54.6 s

    54.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 54.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 12.0 s

    12.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    Your largest element takes 4.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Contenders London 2026 logo”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 5 images without width and height

    5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 131 ms

    131 ms

    Real visitors wait 131 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 683 ms

    683 ms

    Real visitors wait 683 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 24% faster for real visitors

    -24%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 193 ms to 144 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 5.5 MB in 1,079 requests

    5.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.5 MB in 1,079 requests on a phone: scripts 3.7 MB (178), other files 792 KiB (533) and images 507 KiB (261). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.55 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.55 g of CO₂e: 185.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8992
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Hidden but focusable

    23 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 2 tap targets too small

    2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 48 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 6 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 9295
  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“deadline-logo-svg Deadline” and “deadline-logo-svg Deadline”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 241 internal links, 128 external

    The homepage links to 241 pages on deadline.com and 128 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 155 characters

    Your meta description is 155 characters: “Deadline.com is always the first to break up-to-the-minute entertainment, Hollywood and media news, with an unfiltered,…”.

  • Title: 48 characters

    Your title is a healthy 48 characters: “Deadline – Hollywood Entertainment Breaking News”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://deadline.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebPage.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://deadline.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix53
  • robots.txt blocks 3 AI answer engine crawlers

    3 of 6

    Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User) and Perplexity (PerplexityBot). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.

  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.

1 checks passed
  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,828 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 7 pages without a meta description

    /tip-line, /p/awards-season, /h/political-news, /video, /p/events-hub and /p/contenders-television-documentary-unscripted-2026 and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 11 pages without an H1

    /v/tv, /v/film, /p/awards-season, /v/box-office, /v/business and /v/international and 5 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 4 pages with very little text

    /h/political-news, /p/events-hub, /p/contenders-television-documentary-unscripted-2026 and /p/contenders-television-2026 have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 127 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

5 to fixGoogle 3569
  • 10 broken images

    10 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://deadline.com/.

  • 33 third-party cookies

    33 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 18 small tap targets

    18 of 54 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 2 deprecated browser APIs that will stop working in future browsers (“The Topics API is deprecated and will be removed in a future release.”).

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Error: <svg> attribute viewBox: Expected number, "0 0 NaN NaN".”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (deadline.com).

  • Valid certificate (34 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for deadline.com and is valid for another 34 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://deadline.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 60 links work

    All 60 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 20 external) answered without errors; 3 did not answer within 5 s.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    deadline.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    deadline.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 31 years old

    31 years

    deadline.com was registered in Sep 1995 through eNom, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Sep 2027

    deadline.com is registered until Sep 2027.

Content and conversion

3 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,134 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,134 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Sign Up”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Hotjar.

Email authentication

1 to fix70
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be deadline.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.

  • Email authentication score: 70/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:amazonses.com ~all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 10 trackers load before any consent

    10

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Comscore, Criteo, Google Ads and Google Analytics and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 34 cookies set on arrival

    34

    Opening the homepage sets 34 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 95 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 95 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 39 issues on deadline.com, including 18 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25