Website review, no card needed
delasco.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202634 issues · 82 checks
This review found 34 issues worth fixing on delasco.com, 7 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
85B- #14,890 of 108,859 reviewed websitesbeats 82%
- #9,501 of 61,765 online storesbeats 79%
- #9,244 of 56,365 Shopify storesbeats 78%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 1.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 136 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 146 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
4.3 s
8.6 s
13.0 s
17.3 s
21.6 s
25.9 s
30.2 s
34.5 s
Speed
Main-thread work: 4.4 s
A phone's processor spends 4.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.4 MB27 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.4 MB).
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Clarity and Facebook and others), adding 2.9 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 76
76/100Your mobile performance score is 76. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
838 KiBAbout 838 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Improve image delivery
662 KiB20 images could be 662 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Google Tag Manager adds 254 ms
254 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 254 ms of main-thread work and 486 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
300 ms6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 300 ms.
Minify JavaScript
275 KiB275 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
dialpad.com adds 132 ms
132 msdialpad.com costs a phone 132 ms of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Shopify adds 142 ms
142 msShopify costs a phone 142 ms of main-thread work and 545 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
120 ms · 228 KiBAbout 228 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 120 ms faster on a phone.
10 long tasks on the main thread
10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 170 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
58 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 58 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 11 ms
11 msYour server sent the HTML in 11 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Speed Index: 28.5 s
28.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 28.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 25.0 s
25.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 25.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.11
0.11For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.11 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 432 ms
432 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 432 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s
2.1 sThe first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 136 ms to 146 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 153 ms
153 msReal visitors wait 153 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 636 ms
636 msReal visitors wait 636 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 2.1 s
2.1 sYour largest element renders in 2.1 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Save on the products your practice relies on every day, fro…”.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.4 MB in 431 requests
5.4 MBYour homepage downloads 5.4 MB in 431 requests on a phone: scripts 2.9 MB (92), other files 1.3 MB (271) and images 939 KiB (39). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
132 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example fab-icon.png at 2,048 px wide, shown at 32 px. Resized copies would save about 132 KiB.
1 image in older formats
1 image (133 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit
1.54 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.54 g of CO₂e: 185.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
30 text elements with low contrast
30 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Hidden but focusable
2 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (10 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
51 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 5 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“” and “ASDS 2026 Show Specials”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (190 characters)
Your meta description is 190 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
143 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 143 pages on delasco.com and 8 external pages.
6 checks passed
Title: 53 characters
Your title is a healthy 53 characters: “Delasco - Professional Dermatology & Medical Supplies”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.delasco.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, CollectionPage, ImageObject, Organization and WebPage.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.delasco.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (946 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.delasco.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
2 pages without a meta description
https://www.delasco.com/pages/frostaway and https://www.delasco.com/pages/microneedling have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
9 pages without an H1
https://www.delasco.com/pages/frostaway, https://www.delasco.com/pages/microneedling, https://www.delasco.com/collections/sutures, https://www.delasco.com/collections/chemicals, https://www.delasco.com/collections/professional-skincare and https://www.delasco.com/collections/cryosurgery and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 63 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “[Regios Discounts] [USER ERROR] To display discounts on product pages, you need to create an automatic product discount…”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
56 of 60 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 792 words of copy
The homepage carries about 792 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop All Specials” and “Sign Up for the Free Tutorials”.
12 calls to action
The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Shop Now”, “Shop All Specials” and “Sign Up for the Free Tutorials”.
4 short forms
4 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 5 testimonial or review blocks and 2 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and LinkedIn Insight.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
10 trackers load before any consent
10Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amplitude, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and HubSpot and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
35 cookies set on arrival
35Opening the homepage sets 35 cookies, 8 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
49 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 49 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at delasco.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 13 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Yoast Seo · Regios Discounts · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Wisepops Popup Builder Cro · Product Filters Search · Judge Me Reviews · Free Shipping Bar · Buy Again Reorder · Free Gift · Duos B2b · mfyz.app · hextom.com · hubapi.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Shopify
Company
- Employees
- 67
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 34 issues on delasco.com, including 18 speed issues and 3 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.