Website review, no card needed
designbridge.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202630 issues · 85 checks
This review found 30 issues worth fixing on designbridge.com, 8 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
Read the full growth playbook for Design Bridge and Partners
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
78CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 220 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 226 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 226 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 231 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 328 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 338 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 338 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 296 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 206 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 190 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.5 s
0.9 s
1.4 s
1.9 s
2.4 s
2.8 s
3.3 s
3.8 s
designbridge.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.8 s · 419 KiB22 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (419 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 62
62/100Your mobile performance score is 62. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
600 ms · 158 KiBAbout 158 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 137 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
13 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 third-party service on the page
1 third-party service load with your homepage (geojs.io), adding 2 KiB and 0 ms of main-thread time.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 2.0 s
A phone's processor spends 2.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 1 ms
1 msYour server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 9.3 s
9.3 sYour largest element takes 9.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Most awarded global brand design agency”.
Time to Interactive: 9.3 s
9.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 9.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.2 s
6.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.6 s
3.6 sReal visitors wait 3.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 940 ms
940 msReal visitors wait 940 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s
2.6 sThe first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 216 ms
216 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 216 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
5 checks passed
Real-user INP: 193 ms
193 msReal visitors wait 193 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 12% faster for real visitors
-12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 220 ms to 190 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 16% faster for real visitors
-16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.3 s to 3.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 18.2 MB in 64 requests
18.2 MBYour homepage downloads 18.2 MB in 64 requests on a phone: other files 17.1 MB (34), scripts 931 KiB (22) and fonts 76 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 5.2 g of CO₂ per visit
5.17 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.17 g of CO₂e: 620.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
37 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 40 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 3 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (69 characters)
Your title is 69 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Award-Winning Global Brand Design Agency | Design Bridge and Partners”.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://designbridge.com/api/sitemap, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
9 internal links, 0 external
The homepage links to 9 pages on designbridge.com and 0 external pages.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 124 characters
Your meta description is 124 characters: “A Global Brand Design Agency with expertise across Brand Strategy, Brand Identity, Brand Experience and Brand Effective…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Most awarded global brand design agency”.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
/ and /about all use the title “Award-Winning Global Brand Design Agency | Design Bridge and Partners”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
3 pages without an H1
/contact, /work and /insights have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
/contact has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
4 internal pages checked
We fetched 4 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 4 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 4 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 4 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 third-party cookies
3 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “%c%d font-size:0;color:transparent NaN”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
5 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
1 broken link to your own pages
1 link from your homepage to your own site is broken, for example https://www.designbridge.com/Search (404).
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (designbridge.com).
Valid certificate (53 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WR3 verifies for designbridge.com and is valid for another 53 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://designbridge.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
Domain expires in 47 days
designbridge.com is registered until Dec 2026. Make sure auto-renew is on and the card on file is current.
No CAA record
designbridge.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
designbridge.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
1 checks passed
Domain is 27 years old
27 yearsdesignbridge.com was registered in Dec 1998 through CSC Corporate Domains, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 53 words
The homepage has only about 53 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact”.
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact” and “Join us”.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 95/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 a include:mailgun.org include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.createsend.com ip4:79.173.147.162 ip4:79.1…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “selector1” and “selector2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
4 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Hosting
- Google Cloud
Company
- Founded
- 2023
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 30 issues on designbridge.com, including 12 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.