Website review, no card needed

designerblooms.com.ph logo

designerblooms.com.ph website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202656 issues · 102 checks

This review found 56 issues worth fixing on designerblooms.com.ph, 24 of them high impact, across 102 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.2 s1.3 sMay 23Nov 73.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20262.0 s
Jun 6, 20262.2 s
Jun 13, 20262.3 s
Jun 20, 20262.2 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20262.0 s
Jul 11, 20261.9 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.8 s
Aug 1, 20262.0 s
Aug 8, 20262.1 s
Aug 15, 20262.1 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20262.0 s
Sep 5, 20262.1 s
Sep 12, 20262.5 s
Sep 19, 20262.9 s
Sep 26, 20263.5 s
Oct 3, 20264.1 s
Oct 10, 20264.7 s
Oct 17, 20264.7 s
Oct 24, 20264.2 s
Oct 31, 20263.7 s
Nov 7, 20263.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
404 ms99 msMay 23Nov 7303 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026134 ms
May 30, 2026144 ms
Jun 6, 2026185 ms
Jun 13, 2026195 ms
Jun 20, 2026192 ms
Jun 27, 2026154 ms
Jul 4, 2026154 ms
Jul 11, 2026145 ms
Jul 18, 2026149 ms
Jul 25, 2026162 ms
Aug 1, 2026179 ms
Aug 8, 2026175 ms
Aug 15, 2026176 ms
Aug 22, 2026169 ms
Aug 29, 2026158 ms
Sep 5, 2026169 ms
Sep 12, 2026212 ms
Sep 19, 2026246 ms
Sep 26, 2026315 ms
Oct 3, 2026334 ms
Oct 10, 2026348 ms
Oct 17, 2026369 ms
Oct 24, 2026347 ms
Oct 31, 2026342 ms
Nov 7, 2026303 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of designerblooms.com.ph (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. designerblooms.com.ph at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. designerblooms.com.ph at 2.0 s2.0 s
  3. designerblooms.com.ph at 3.0 s3.0 s
  4. designerblooms.com.ph at 4.0 s4.0 s
  5. designerblooms.com.ph at 5.0 s5.0 s
  6. designerblooms.com.ph at 6.0 s6.0 s
  7. designerblooms.com.ph at 7.1 s7.1 s
  8. designerblooms.com.ph at 8.1 s8.1 s

Speed

12 to fix41
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    4.8 s · 832 KiB

    9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (832 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.3 s · 560 KiB

    About 560 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 41

    41/100

    Your mobile performance score is 41. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 3,609 HTML elements

    The page has 3,609 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, rise-ai.com and productessentials.app and others), adding 2.8 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 209 KiB

    About 209 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 430 ms

    430 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 430 ms of main-thread work and 342 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    450 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 450 ms.

  • rise-ai.com adds 203 ms

    203 ms

    rise-ai.com costs a phone 203 ms of main-thread work and 1.6 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 17 long tasks on the main thread

    17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 282 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Klaviyo adds 140 ms

    140 ms

    Klaviyo costs a phone 140 ms of main-thread work and 310 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    200 ms · 73 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 73 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    118 KiB

    10 images could be 118 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Minify CSS

    6 KiB

    6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 29 ms

    29 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 29 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

14 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    Real visitors wait 4.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 38.8 s

    38.8 s

    Your largest element takes 38.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Enjoy 20% OFF your first order! First Name Last Name Email …”.

  • Time to Interactive: 39.1 s

    39.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 39.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 11.7 s

    11.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 938 ms

    938 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 938 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user INP: 391 ms

    391 ms

    Real visitors wait 391 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.18

    0.18

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.18 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 132% slower for real visitors

    +132%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 134 ms to 303 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 69% slower for real visitors

    +69%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 924 ms

    924 ms

    Real visitors wait 924 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 48 images without width and height

    48 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

1 checks passed
  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 6.8 MB in 305 requests

    6.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.8 MB in 305 requests on a phone: scripts 2.3 MB (84), images 2.1 MB (39) and other files 1.9 MB (152). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.93 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.93 g of CO₂e: 231.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

16 to fixGoogle 6480
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    3 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (3 elements)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (2 elements)

    ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (5 elements)

    ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (5 elements)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • ARIA toggle fields must have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA toggle fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (3 elements)

    Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 53 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 68 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 53 passed and 15 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8587
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 19 links with vague text

    19 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • 111 internal links, 71 external

    The homepage links to 111 pages on designerblooms.com.ph and 71 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 151 characters

    Your meta description is 151 characters: “Elevate your floral experience with stunning bouquets and arrangements. We offer imported flowers, NCR-wide, next-day d…”.

  • Title: 60 characters

    Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “Flower Delivery & Home Styling Services | Designer Blooms PH”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://designerblooms.com.ph/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://designerblooms.com.ph/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,904 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://designerblooms.com.ph/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix93
  • 5 pages share a meta description

    https://designerblooms.com.ph/collections/faux-pine, https://designerblooms.com.ph/collections/trees-tree-skirts, https://designerblooms.com.ph/collections/decor, https://designerblooms.com.ph/collections/ornaments-sprays and https://designerblooms.com.ph/collections/stockings-ribbons use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    https://designerblooms.com.ph/collections/all-blooms, https://designerblooms.com.ph/pages/rewards-program-page, https://designerblooms.com.ph/pages/locations, https://designerblooms.com.ph/pages/designer-blooms-installations, https://designerblooms.com.ph/collections/sale and https://designerblooms.com.ph/pages/christmas and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 pages with very little text

    https://designerblooms.com.ph/collections/all-blooms, https://designerblooms.com.ph/pages/rewards-program-page, https://designerblooms.com.ph/pages/locations, https://designerblooms.com.ph/pages/designer-blooms-installations, https://designerblooms.com.ph/collections/sale and https://designerblooms.com.ph/pages/christmas and 9 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 46 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 5483
  • 18 small tap targets

    18 of 79 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of null (reading 'add')”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,547 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,547 words of visible text.

  • Urgency cues

    The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SHOP NOW” and “PRE-ORDER NOW”.

  • 14 calls to action

    The homepage has 14 calls to action, for example “SHOP NOW”, “Shop All” and “SHOP NEW DESIGNS”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 124 testimonial or review blocks and 2 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 15 cookies set on arrival

    15

    Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 33 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 33 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at designerblooms.com.ph, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 7 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Inbox · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Judge Me Reviews · Epa Easy Product Addons · Discount Planner By Productessentials · Freegifts · rise-ai.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 56 issues on designerblooms.com.ph, including 26 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25