Website review, no card needed

dietsmann.com logo

dietsmann.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202641 issues · 94 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on dietsmann.com, 8 of them high impact, across 94 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.5 s2.8 sMay 9Oct 243.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20264.2 s
May 16, 20264.3 s
May 23, 20264.3 s
May 30, 20264.2 s
Jun 6, 20263.9 s
Jun 13, 20263.5 s
Jun 20, 20263.1 s
Jun 27, 20263.2 s
Jul 4, 20263.1 s
Jul 11, 20263.1 s
Jul 18, 20263.1 s
Jul 25, 20263.2 s
Aug 1, 20263.3 s
Aug 8, 20263.3 s
Aug 15, 20263.2 s
Aug 22, 20263.1 s
Aug 29, 20263.2 s
Sep 5, 20263.1 s
Sep 12, 20263.3 s
Sep 19, 20263.4 s
Sep 26, 20263.3 s
Oct 3, 20263.2 s
Oct 10, 20263.1 s
Oct 17, 20263.0 s
Oct 24, 20263.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
124 ms95 msMay 9Oct 24117 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026118 ms
May 16, 2026121 ms
May 23, 2026120 ms
May 30, 2026119 ms
Jun 6, 2026113 ms
Jun 13, 2026110 ms
Jun 20, 2026112 ms
Jun 27, 2026117 ms
Jul 4, 2026111 ms
Jul 11, 2026106 ms
Jul 18, 202699 ms
Jul 25, 202698 ms
Aug 1, 2026108 ms
Aug 8, 2026111 ms
Aug 15, 2026112 ms
Aug 22, 2026111 ms
Aug 29, 2026107 ms
Sep 5, 2026108 ms
Sep 12, 2026112 ms
Sep 19, 2026112 ms
Sep 26, 2026110 ms
Oct 3, 2026108 ms
Oct 10, 2026108 ms
Oct 17, 2026111 ms
Oct 24, 2026117 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of dietsmann.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. dietsmann.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. dietsmann.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. dietsmann.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. dietsmann.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. dietsmann.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. dietsmann.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. dietsmann.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. dietsmann.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

dietsmann.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

5 to fix70
  • Render-blocking requests

    4.2 s

    83 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.2 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    350 ms · 708 KiB

    8 images could be 708 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    900 ms · 137 KiB

    About 137 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 70

    70/100

    Your mobile performance score is 70. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    450 ms · 68 KiB

    About 68 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 21 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • 1 third-party service on the page

    1 third-party service load with your homepage (Google Fonts), adding 118 KiB and 1 ms of main-thread time.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 207 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 36 ms

    36 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 36 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.0 s

    4.0 s

    Real visitors wait 4.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 14.6 s

    14.6 s

    Your largest element takes 14.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Maintenance innovators in onshore & offshore”.

  • Time to Interactive: 15.3 s

    15.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 118 ms to 117 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 119 ms

    119 ms

    Real visitors wait 119 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 28% faster for real visitors

    -28%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.2 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix74
  • Page weight: 3.9 MB in 196 requests

    3.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.9 MB in 196 requests on a phone: images 2.9 MB (21), scripts 405 KiB (68) and stylesheets 358 KiB (100). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    header-02-400x234.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (740 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (55 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.10 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.10 g of CO₂e: 131.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9494
  • 3 tap targets too small

    3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 20 links without text

    20 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 4 form fields without a label

    4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings should not be empty (2 elements)

    Headings should not be empty: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 35 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

8 to fixGoogle 9166
  • Title is short (16 characters)

    Your title is only 16 characters: “Home - Dietsmann”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 10 H1 headlines

    There are 10 <h1> headlines (“”, “Maintenance innovators in onshore & offshore” and “”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (295 characters)

    Your meta description is 295 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 20 links with vague text

    20 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.dietsmann.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at dietsmann.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • 119 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 119 pages on dietsmann.com and 5 external pages.

1 checks passed
  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,033 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix88
  • 2 pages without a meta description

    /news.html and /contact.html have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages share a meta description

    /visit-to-iter.html, /african-energy-week-2025-cloned.html and /african-energy-week-2025.html use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 6 pages without an H1

    /news.html, /contact.html, /visit-to-iter.html, /african-energy-week-2025-cloned.html, /african-energy-week-2025.html and /new-contract-mie-nigeria.html have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    /history.html and /careers.html have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 34 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10087
  • 5 small tap targets

    5 of 7 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Connecting to 'https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Roboto:100,100i,200,200i,300,300i,400,400i,500,500i,600,600i,700…”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (dietsmann.com).

  • Valid certificate (79 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for dietsmann.com and is valid for another 79 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://dietsmann.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 40 links work

    All 40 links checked from your homepage (35 internal, 5 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

1 to fix
  • Domain expires in 74 days

    dietsmann.com is registered until Jan 2027. Make sure auto-renew is on and the card on file is current.

  • No CAA record

    dietsmann.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 30 years old

    30 years

    dietsmann.com was registered in Jan 1996 through OVH sas. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • DNSSEC is on

    dietsmann.com's DNS answers are signed (DNSSEC), so they can't be forged on the way to visitors.

Content and conversion

4 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 528 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 528 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Contact”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (5 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

Email authentication

90
  • Email authentication score: 90/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 a mx ip4:152.228.153.12 ip4:152.228.153.2 include:mx.ovh.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 2 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Hosting
OVHcloud

Company

Founded
1969
Headquarters
Sofia

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on dietsmann.com, including 14 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25