Website review, no card needed

diplomium.com logo

diplomium.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202620 issues · 72 checks

This review found 20 issues worth fixing on diplomium.com, 4 of them high impact, across 72 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.8 s2.6 sMay 23Nov 74.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20264.1 s
May 30, 20264.3 s
Jun 6, 20264.6 s
Jun 13, 20264.0 s
Jun 20, 20263.7 s
Jun 27, 20263.5 s
Jul 4, 20263.5 s
Jul 11, 20263.7 s
Jul 18, 20263.8 s
Jul 25, 20263.8 s
Aug 1, 20263.6 s
Aug 8, 20263.3 s
Aug 15, 20263.1 s
Aug 22, 20262.9 s
Aug 29, 20263.2 s
Sep 5, 20263.4 s
Sep 12, 20263.4 s
Sep 19, 20263.5 s
Sep 26, 20263.3 s
Oct 3, 20263.3 s
Oct 10, 20263.3 s
Oct 17, 20263.6 s
Oct 24, 20263.8 s
Oct 31, 20263.9 s
Nov 7, 20264.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
173 ms94 msMay 23Nov 7157 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026163 ms
May 30, 2026164 ms
Jun 6, 2026144 ms
Jun 13, 2026161 ms
Jun 20, 2026162 ms
Jun 27, 2026159 ms
Jul 4, 2026163 ms
Jul 11, 2026161 ms
Jul 18, 2026157 ms
Jul 25, 2026160 ms
Aug 1, 2026138 ms
Aug 8, 2026123 ms
Aug 15, 2026103 ms
Aug 22, 2026103 ms
Aug 29, 2026114 ms
Sep 5, 2026127 ms
Sep 12, 2026136 ms
Sep 19, 2026139 ms
Sep 26, 2026149 ms
Oct 3, 2026156 ms
Oct 10, 2026148 ms
Oct 17, 2026141 ms
Oct 24, 2026128 ms
Oct 31, 2026156 ms
Nov 7, 2026157 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of diplomium.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. diplomium.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. diplomium.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. diplomium.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. diplomium.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. diplomium.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. diplomium.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. diplomium.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. diplomium.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

2 to fix99
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.2 s

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.2 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    300 ms · 2.4 MB

    16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.4 MB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 37 KiB

    About 37 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (Clarity and Google Fonts), adding 78 KiB and 61 ms of main-thread time.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Improve image delivery

    5 KiB

    1 image could be 5 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

3 checks passed
  • Mobile performance score: 99

    99/100

    Your mobile performance score is 99. That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).

  • Main-thread work: 0.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 148 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.0 s

    4.0 s

    Real visitors wait 4.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.18

    0.18

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.18 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 163 ms to 157 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.1 s to 4.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 157 ms

    157 ms

    Real visitors wait 157 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 792 ms

    792 ms

    Real visitors wait 792 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 2.9 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.003

    0.003

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.003, good is under 0.1).

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Your largest element renders in 1.1 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Automatically generate and email your certificates in no ti…”.

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    The page is fully interactive after 1.1 s.

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.5 MB in 26 requests

    2.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.5 MB in 26 requests on a phone: media 2.3 MB (2), fonts 109 KiB (2) and scripts 57 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.71 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.71 g of CO₂e: 85.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9896
  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (10 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 12 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 30 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 32 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 30 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10096
  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (FAQPage and VideoObject) but with 1 problem, for example “VideoObject: contentUrl is not an absolute URL ("https://www.diplomium.com/assets/images/Final Cort…”.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 5 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 5 pages on diplomium.com and 6 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 159 characters

    Your meta description is 159 characters: “Platform for automatic certificate generation and email delivery. Additionally, Diplomium creates certificates with QR …”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Automatically generate and email your certificates in no time!”.

  • Title: 44 characters

    Your title is a healthy 44 characters: “Diplomium | Automatic Certificate Generation”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://diplomium.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://diplomium.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (693 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://diplomium.com/llms.txt (4 KiB, 16 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 2 pages share a title

    / and https://diplomium.com/blog all use the title “Diplomium | Automatic certificate generation”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://diplomium.com/blog, whose canonical is https://diplomium.com/blog/en. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://diplomium.com/app has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 internal pages checked

    We fetched 2 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 2 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 2 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 2 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9691
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    6 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix81
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Only about 228 words

    The homepage has only about 228 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get Started!” and “Learn More”.

  • 11 calls to action

    The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Pricing”, “Contact” and “Sign Up”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (4 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at diplomium.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Bootstrap
Analytics
Google Analytics | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Dattatec.com

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 20 issues on diplomium.com, including 6 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25