Website review, no card needed
diplomium.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202620 issues · 72 checks
This review found 20 issues worth fixing on diplomium.com, 4 of them high impact, across 72 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
83BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 4.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 163 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 157 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.2 s5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.2 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
300 ms · 2.4 MB16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.4 MB).
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 37 KiBAbout 37 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (Clarity and Google Fonts), adding 78 KiB and 61 ms of main-thread time.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Improve image delivery
5 KiB1 image could be 5 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
3 checks passed
Mobile performance score: 99
99/100Your mobile performance score is 99. That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).
Main-thread work: 0.5 s
A phone's processor spends 0.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 148 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 3.9 s
3.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 4.0 s
4.0 sReal visitors wait 4.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.18
0.18For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.18 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 163 ms to 157 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.1 s to 4.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Real-user INP: 157 ms
157 msReal visitors wait 157 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 792 ms
792 msReal visitors wait 792 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 2.9 s
2.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 2.9 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s
1.1 sThe first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.003
0.003The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.003, good is under 0.1).
Largest Contentful Paint: 1.1 s
1.1 sYour largest element renders in 1.1 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Automatically generate and email your certificates in no ti…”.
Total Blocking Time: 0 ms
0 msScripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Time to Interactive: 1.1 s
1.1 sThe page is fully interactive after 1.1 s.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.5 MB in 26 requests
2.5 MBYour homepage downloads 2.5 MB in 26 requests on a phone: media 2.3 MB (2), fonts 109 KiB (2) and scripts 57 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit
0.71 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.71 g of CO₂e: 85.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
All page content should be contained by landmarks (10 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 12 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
30 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 32 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 30 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (FAQPage and VideoObject) but with 1 problem, for example “VideoObject: contentUrl is not an absolute URL ("https://www.diplomium.com/assets/images/Final Cort…”.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
5 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 5 pages on diplomium.com and 6 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 159 characters
Your meta description is 159 characters: “Platform for automatic certificate generation and email delivery. Additionally, Diplomium creates certificates with QR …”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Automatically generate and email your certificates in no time!”.
Title: 44 characters
Your title is a healthy 44 characters: “Diplomium | Automatic Certificate Generation”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://diplomium.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://diplomium.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (693 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://diplomium.com/llms.txt (4 KiB, 16 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
/ and https://diplomium.com/blog all use the title “Diplomium | Automatic certificate generation”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://diplomium.com/blog, whose canonical is https://diplomium.com/blog/en. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page without an H1
https://diplomium.com/app has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 internal pages checked
We fetched 2 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 2 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 2 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 2 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
6 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Only about 228 words
The homepage has only about 228 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get Started!” and “Learn More”.
11 calls to action
The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Pricing”, “Contact” and “Sign Up”.
1 short form
A short form (4 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
7 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at diplomium.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Bootstrap
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Dattatec.com
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 20 issues on diplomium.com, including 6 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.