Website review, no card needed

Doximity logo

doximity.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202641 issues · 103 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on doximity.com, 9 of them high impact, across 103 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

Read the full growth playbook for Doximity

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.8 s1.7 sApr 18Oct 32.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20261.9 s
Apr 25, 20261.9 s
May 2, 20261.8 s
May 9, 20261.8 s
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20261.9 s
Jun 6, 20261.9 s
Jun 13, 20262.0 s
Jun 20, 20262.0 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20262.1 s
Jul 11, 20262.1 s
Jul 18, 20262.1 s
Jul 25, 20262.1 s
Aug 1, 20262.1 s
Aug 8, 20262.1 s
Aug 15, 20262.1 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.2 s
Sep 12, 20262.1 s
Sep 19, 20262.0 s
Sep 26, 20262.0 s
Oct 3, 20262.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
80 ms78 msApr 18Oct 379 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 202679 ms
Apr 25, 202678 ms
May 2, 202678 ms
May 9, 202678 ms
May 16, 202679 ms
May 23, 202679 ms
May 30, 202679 ms
Jun 6, 202679 ms
Jun 13, 202679 ms
Jun 20, 202679 ms
Jun 27, 202679 ms
Jul 4, 202679 ms
Jul 11, 202679 ms
Jul 18, 202679 ms
Jul 25, 202680 ms
Aug 1, 202680 ms
Aug 8, 202680 ms
Aug 15, 202680 ms
Aug 22, 202680 ms
Aug 29, 202679 ms
Sep 5, 202679 ms
Sep 12, 202679 ms
Sep 19, 202679 ms
Sep 26, 202679 ms
Oct 3, 202679 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of doximity.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. doximity.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. doximity.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. doximity.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  4. doximity.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  5. doximity.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  6. doximity.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  7. doximity.com at 3.3 s3.3 s
  8. doximity.com at 3.8 s3.8 s

doximity.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

9 to fix71
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 71

    71/100

    Your mobile performance score is 71 (desktop: 74). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Improve image delivery

    988 KiB

    19 images could be 988 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    460 ms · 517 KiB

    About 517 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 460 ms faster on a phone.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 2.1 MB and 386 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 105 KiB

    About 105 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google CDN adds 289 ms

    289 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 289 ms of main-thread work and 733 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • doxcdn.com adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    doxcdn.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 184 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    104 KiB

    13 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (104 KiB).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    20 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 20 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 13.8 s

    13.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 13.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 23% slower for real visitors

    +23%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    Your largest element takes 3.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Stanford & Harvard Study: Doximity Ask is the most accurate…”.

  • Speed Index: 5.2 s

    5.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 327 ms

    327 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 327 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 17 images without width and height

    17 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 79 ms to 79 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 145 ms

    145 ms

    Real visitors wait 145 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 799 ms

    799 ms

    Real visitors wait 799 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.024

    0.024

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.024, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix75
  • Page weight: 2.8 MB in 102 requests

    2.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.8 MB in 102 requests on a phone: scripts 1.2 MB (19), images 1.0 MB (29) and other files 389 KiB (42). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    150 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example logo-cancer-treatment-centers-of-america.jpg at 627 px wide, shown at 106 px. Resized copies would save about 150 KiB.

  • 9 images in older formats

    9 images (438 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.81 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.81 g of CO₂e: 96.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 7588
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    3 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 9 tap targets too small

    9 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)

    Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Users should be able to zoom and scale the text up to 500% (1 element)

    Users should be able to zoom and scale the text up to 500%: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 41 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 8370
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (14 characters)

    Your title is only 14 characters: “AI for Doctors”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.doximity.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 29 internal links, 16 external

    The homepage links to 29 pages on doximity.com and 16 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Clinical AI for Physicians”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

AI search readiness

2 to fix75
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • Some text only appears after JavaScript runs

    59%

    The HTML your server sends has 420 of the 707 words a browser shows. AI crawlers don't run JavaScript, so they miss the rest.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

3 to fix88
  • 12 pages without a meta description

    /app, /desktop, /ask/overview, /dialer, /clinicians/scribe and /about/company and 6 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    /about/research and /about/press use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 page without an H1

    /blog has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    /about/contact and /directory have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    /blog and /about/jobs took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 20 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 7791
  • 5 small tap targets

    5 of 13 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“The Protected Audience API is deprecated and will be removed in a future release.”).

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • 4 links through redirect chains

    4 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.doximity.com/recruiting.

9 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (doximity.com).

  • Valid certificate (119 days left)

    The certificate from Sectigo Limited · Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA verifies for doximity.com and is valid for another 119 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://doximity.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 38 links work

    All 38 links checked from your homepage (22 internal, 16 external) answered without errors.

  • security.txt published

    A security.txt file tells researchers how to report a problem with your site.

Domain and trust

  • DNSSEC is off

    doximity.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 16 years old

    16 years

    doximity.com was registered in Dec 2009 through Name106, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Certificate issuers are restricted

    CAA records allow only amazon.com, digicert.com, globalsign.com and letsencrypt.org to issue certificates for doximity.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.

  • Registered until Dec 2030

    doximity.com is registered until Dec 2030.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 707 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 707 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “quote carousel bullet 1”, “quote carousel bullet 2” and “quote carousel bullet 3”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 50 testimonial or review blocks and 30 customer or partner logos.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Email authentication

85
  • Email authentication score: 85/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:sendgrid.net include:mail.zendesk.com include:mg-spf…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 10 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Hiring

Hiring
15 open roles
Teams
Data (5), Sales & Client Success (2), Clinical Search (1), Finance (Doximity) (1)
Job board
greenhouse

Company

Founded
2011
Headquarters
San Mateo

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 41 issues on doximity.com, including 16 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25