Website review, no card needed

dreamstime.com logo

dreamstime.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 14 November 202626 issues · 64 checks

This review found 26 issues worth fixing on dreamstime.com, 5 of them high impact, across 64 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.5 s2.0 sMay 23Nov 72.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.4 s
Jun 6, 20262.4 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.3 s
Jun 27, 20262.3 s
Jul 4, 20262.2 s
Jul 11, 20262.1 s
Jul 18, 20262.0 s
Jul 25, 20262.1 s
Aug 1, 20262.1 s
Aug 8, 20262.1 s
Aug 15, 20262.1 s
Aug 22, 20262.1 s
Aug 29, 20262.1 s
Sep 5, 20262.1 s
Sep 12, 20262.1 s
Sep 19, 20262.1 s
Sep 26, 20262.1 s
Oct 3, 20262.1 s
Oct 10, 20262.1 s
Oct 17, 20262.1 s
Oct 24, 20262.1 s
Oct 31, 20262.1 s
Nov 7, 20262.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
163 ms118 msMay 23Nov 7158 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026123 ms
May 30, 2026123 ms
Jun 6, 2026124 ms
Jun 13, 2026125 ms
Jun 20, 2026125 ms
Jun 27, 2026126 ms
Jul 4, 2026126 ms
Jul 11, 2026125 ms
Jul 18, 2026124 ms
Jul 25, 2026123 ms
Aug 1, 2026123 ms
Aug 8, 2026124 ms
Aug 15, 2026127 ms
Aug 22, 2026128 ms
Aug 29, 2026129 ms
Sep 5, 2026130 ms
Sep 12, 2026130 ms
Sep 19, 2026132 ms
Sep 26, 2026135 ms
Oct 3, 2026139 ms
Oct 10, 2026142 ms
Oct 17, 2026144 ms
Oct 24, 2026146 ms
Oct 31, 2026147 ms
Nov 7, 2026158 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of dreamstime.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. dreamstime.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. dreamstime.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. dreamstime.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. dreamstime.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. dreamstime.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. dreamstime.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. dreamstime.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. dreamstime.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

8 to fix66
  • Mobile performance score: 66

    66/100

    Your mobile performance score is 66. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, px-cloud.net and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 834 KiB and 738 ms of main-thread time.

  • 15 long tasks on the main thread

    15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 803 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    360 ms · 245 KiB

    About 245 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 360 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 3.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 319 ms

    319 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 319 ms of main-thread work and 348 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • px-cloud.net adds 313 ms

    313 ms

    px-cloud.net costs a phone 313 ms of main-thread work and 276 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    283 KiB

    4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (283 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    213 KiB

    6 images could be 213 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    17 KiB

    About 17 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 48 ms

    48 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 48 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.8 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 8.7 s

    8.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 8.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Real visitors wait 2.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 24% slower for real visitors

    +24%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 123 ms to 158 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Your largest element takes 3.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “misty mountain ridges in the morning artistic photo of carp…”.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 183 ms

    183 ms

    Real visitors wait 183 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.3 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Speed Index: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 1.6 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.48 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.48 g of CO₂e: 57.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.7 MB in 92 requests

    1.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.7 MB in 92 requests on a phone: scripts 826 KiB (16), images 717 KiB (21) and other files 110 KiB (53). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fix93
  • 6 images without alt text

    6 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 35 tap targets too small

    35 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10096
  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.dreamstime.com/sitemap2-en-index.xml.gz, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 193 internal links, 11 external

    The homepage links to 193 pages on dreamstime.com and 11 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 147 characters

    Your meta description is 147 characters: “Find the perfect stock photos, images and vectors for your project. Quickly search over 378 million images including fr…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “378 million royalty-free stock photos, vectors & videos — world's largest stock community”.

  • Title: 58 characters

    Your title is a healthy 58 characters: “Stock Photos & Images, Vectors, Video & Audio - Dreamstime”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.dreamstime.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: FAQPage, Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.dreamstime.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 160 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

1 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    7 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9692
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 403 ()”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix57
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 20 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • A 8-field form

    Your longest form asks for 8 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 15 words

    The homepage has only about 15 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • 8 calls to action

    The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Sign up for free”, “Prices and download plans” and “Prices and Download plans”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 10 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at dreamstime.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
IBM Cloud

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 26 issues on dreamstime.com, including 16 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25