Website review, no card needed

dutoit.com logo

dutoit.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202646 issues · 106 checks

This review found 46 issues worth fixing on dutoit.com, 12 of them high impact, across 106 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.7 s2.8 sMay 2Oct 173.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.0 s
May 9, 20263.0 s
May 16, 20263.2 s
May 23, 20263.5 s
May 30, 20263.9 s
Jun 6, 20264.0 s
Jun 13, 20264.1 s
Jun 20, 20264.0 s
Jun 27, 20263.9 s
Jul 4, 20263.8 s
Jul 11, 20263.8 s
Jul 18, 20263.9 s
Jul 25, 20264.0 s
Aug 1, 20263.8 s
Aug 8, 20263.8 s
Aug 15, 20263.8 s
Aug 22, 20263.9 s
Aug 29, 20264.2 s
Sep 5, 20264.3 s
Sep 12, 20264.4 s
Sep 19, 20264.5 s
Sep 26, 20264.3 s
Oct 3, 20263.9 s
Oct 10, 20263.8 s
Oct 17, 20263.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
217 ms110 msMay 2Oct 17172 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026122 ms
May 9, 2026123 ms
May 16, 2026138 ms
May 23, 2026147 ms
May 30, 2026159 ms
Jun 6, 2026165 ms
Jun 13, 2026164 ms
Jun 20, 2026159 ms
Jun 27, 2026147 ms
Jul 4, 2026142 ms
Jul 11, 2026148 ms
Jul 18, 2026171 ms
Jul 25, 2026188 ms
Aug 1, 2026181 ms
Aug 8, 2026181 ms
Aug 15, 2026164 ms
Aug 22, 2026148 ms
Aug 29, 2026185 ms
Sep 5, 2026190 ms
Sep 12, 2026192 ms
Sep 19, 2026205 ms
Sep 26, 2026179 ms
Oct 3, 2026156 ms
Oct 10, 2026179 ms
Oct 17, 2026172 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

11 to fix44
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    6.7 s · 3.1 MB

    127 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.1 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    5.8 s

    60 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.8 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.9 s · 794 KiB

    About 794 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 44

    44/100

    Your mobile performance score is 44 (desktop: 65). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Amazon Web Services and others), adding 585 KiB and 711 ms of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    300 ms · 303 KiB

    6 images could be 303 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 436 ms

    436 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 436 ms of main-thread work and 314 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    350 ms · 47 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 47 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 336 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 2.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Facebook adds 258 ms

    258 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 258 ms of main-thread work and 212 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    22 KiB

    22 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    12 KiB

    About 12 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors wait 2.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 17.4 s

    17.4 s

    Your largest element takes 17.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Dutoit Group is An integrated investment group that invests…”.

  • Speed Index: 13.6 s

    13.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 13.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 18.1 s

    18.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 18.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.7 s

    3.7 s

    Real visitors wait 3.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 43% slower for real visitors

    +43%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 122 ms to 172 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 24% slower for real visitors

    +24%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 3.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 575 ms

    575 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 575 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 173 ms

    173 ms

    Real visitors wait 173 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.09

    0.09

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.09, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 3.4 MB in 134 requests

    3.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.4 MB in 134 requests on a phone: images 1.6 MB (29), scripts 1.6 MB (39) and stylesheets 149 KiB (60). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (30 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.98 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.98 g of CO₂e: 117.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

11 to fixGoogle 8788
  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (9 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 9 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)

    Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Hidden but focusable

    1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 25 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 10 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 8577
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 3 H1 headlines

    There are 3 <h1> headlines (“Dutoit Group isAn integrated investment group tha…”, “Juicy GemsOrchard to Adventure” and “Dutoit Group isAn integrated investment group tha…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 58 internal links, 20 external

    The homepage links to 58 pages on dutoit.com and 20 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Title: 32 characters

    Your title is a healthy 32 characters: “Dutoit – Dedication Always Shows”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.dutoit.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.dutoit.com/wp-sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,393 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 12 pages without a meta description

    /dutoit-group, /about, /about/our-social-contract, /about/careers, /about/business-divisions and /about/what-we-do and 6 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 5 pages without an H1

    /about/what-we-do, /products, /news, /news/newsletters and /contact have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    /news/newsletters has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 8 pages slow to respond

    /about/careers, /about/business-divisions, /about/what-we-do, /packing-facilities, /products and /our-brands and 2 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 12 internal pages checked

    We fetched 12 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 12 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    5 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix93
  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

6 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (dutoit.com).

  • Valid certificate (87 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR1 verifies for dutoit.com and is valid for another 87 days.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://dutoit.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 34 links work

    All 34 links checked from your homepage (15 internal, 19 external) answered without errors; 3 did not answer within 5 s.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    dutoit.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    dutoit.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 28 years old

    28 years

    dutoit.com was registered in Sep 1998 through Tucows Domains Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Sep 2027

    dutoit.com is registered until Sep 2027.

Content and conversion

1 to fix88
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 357 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 357 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact” and “SHOP NOW”.

  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Shop now” and “Contact Us”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Email authentication

1 to fix75
  • SPF does not block other senders (no all)

    Your SPF record doesn't end in -all or ~all, so it doesn't stop other servers sending as you: “v=spf1 redirect=dutoit.com.spf.sophosdmarc.net”.

  • Email authentication score: 75/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “selector2” and “k2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

CMS
WordPress 7.1.3
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 46 issues on dutoit.com, including 22 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25