Website review, no card needed
eatdeux.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 November 202626 issues · 82 checks
This review found 26 issues worth fixing on eatdeux.com, 7 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: 3 text elements with low contrast. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
83B- #25,242 of 109,350 reviewed websitesbeats 72%
- #16,619 of 61,859 online storesbeats 67%
- #16,121 of 56,401 Shopify storesbeats 65%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 987 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 979 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 949 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 1.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 104 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 92 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.5 s
0.9 s
1.4 s
1.8 s
2.3 s
2.8 s
3.2 s
3.7 s
Speed
Mobile performance score: 73
73/100Your mobile performance score is 73. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
600 ms · 229 KiBAbout 229 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
750 ms3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.
Improve image delivery
458 KiB15 images could be 458 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 206 KiB11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (206 KiB).
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Hotjar, Yotpo and Shopify and others), adding 372 KiB and 215 ms of main-thread time.
2 long tasks on the main thread
2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 197 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 14 KiBAbout 14 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
11 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.9 s
A phone's processor spends 1.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 700 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 10 ms
10 msYour server sent the HTML in 10 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 8.4 s
8.4 sYour largest element takes 8.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 9.5 s
9.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 9.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
73 images without width and height
73 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Speed Index: 3.4 s
3.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 3.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 104 ms to 92 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
10 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 99 ms
99 msReal visitors wait 99 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 455 ms
455 msReal visitors wait 455 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 16% faster for real visitors
-16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 130 ms
130 msScripts block the page for only 130 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s
1.1 sThe first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.2 MB in 164 requests
3.2 MBYour homepage downloads 3.2 MB in 164 requests on a phone: images 1.5 MB (43), other files 679 KiB (71) and scripts 672 KiB (40). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images far larger than shown
51 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example IMG_3014_2.png at 358 px wide, shown at 89 px. Resized copies would save about 51 KiB.
About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit
0.92 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.92 g of CO₂e: 110.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (3 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 39 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (26 characters)
Your title is only 26 characters: “DEUX | Good-For-You Snacks”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: sameAs is an empty list”.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:title and og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
36 internal links, 2 external
The homepage links to 36 pages on eatdeux.com and 2 external pages.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 157 characters
Your meta description is 157 characters: “Edible, vegan and gluten-free snacks enhanced with functional ingredients like immunity vitamins, collagen & protein. A…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.eatdeux.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.eatdeux.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (573 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.eatdeux.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
7 pages without a meta description
https://www.eatdeux.com/pages/become-a-member, https://www.eatdeux.com/collections/bundle-sale, https://www.eatdeux.com/collections/cookie-dough, https://www.eatdeux.com/collections/dessert-spreads, https://www.eatdeux.com/collections/donuts and https://www.eatdeux.com/collections/all-products and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page without an H1
https://www.eatdeux.com/collections/all-products has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages with very little text
https://www.eatdeux.com/pages/become-a-member, https://www.eatdeux.com/pages/contact and https://www.eatdeux.com/pages/invite-friends have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
14 internal pages checked
We fetched 14 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 14 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 broken images
3 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.eatdeux.com/Liquid%20error%20(snippets/responsive-image%20line%2042):%20invalid%20url%20input.
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Unexpected identifier 'document'”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
19 of 20 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 5 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 607 words of copy
The homepage carries about 607 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
10 calls to action
The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “SHOP COOKIE DOUGHS”, “SHOP SPREADS” and “SHOP DONUTS”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Hotjar.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
16 cookies set on arrival
16Opening the homepage sets 16 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
24 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 24 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at eatdeux.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 1 app. It is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
postscript.io
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Hotjar
- Hosting
- Shopify
Company
- Headquarters
- Los Angeles
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 26 issues on eatdeux.com, including 8 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.