Website review, no card needed
eco.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202630 issues · 93 checks
This review found 30 issues worth fixing on eco.com, 5 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 11.2 MB in 66 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
77CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 335 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 303 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 257 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 248 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 233 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 228 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 140 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (framerusercontent.com, Google Tag Manager and framer.com and others), adding 11.2 MB and 537 ms of main-thread time.
framerusercontent.com adds 366 ms
366 msframerusercontent.com costs a phone 366 ms of main-thread work and 10.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 75
75/100Your mobile performance score is 75. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
610 ms · 181 KiBAbout 181 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 610 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 246 KiB4 images could be 246 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 102 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Use efficient cache lifetimes
16 KiB3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (16 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
10 KiBAbout 10 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.7 s
A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 695 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 73 ms
73 msYour server sent the HTML in 73 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 5.6 s
5.6 sYour largest element takes 5.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Program money movement across digital asset markets—with st…”.
Time to Interactive: 9.4 s
9.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 9.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.9 s
2.9 sReal visitors wait 2.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 278 ms
278 msReal visitors wait 278 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 988 ms
988 msReal visitors wait 988 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.2 s
2.2 sThe first text or image appears after 2.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 4.1 s
4.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 4.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
4 images without width and height
4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
5 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 55% faster for real visitors
-55%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 335 ms to 140 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 21% faster for real visitors
-21%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 90 ms
90 msScripts block the page for only 90 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 11.2 MB in 66 requests
11.2 MBYour homepage downloads 11.2 MB in 66 requests on a phone: media 9.9 MB (1), images 547 KiB (34) and scripts 537 KiB (20). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
zDbCmswUWhSXiVkUxMEYy2NpuE.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (105 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 3.2 g of CO₂ per visit
3.19 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.19 g of CO₂e: 382.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
1 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 72 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“The Smartest Money Moves With Eco” and “The Smartest Money Moves With Eco”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (203 characters)
Your meta description is 203 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
50 internal links, 110 external
The homepage links to 50 pages on eco.com and 110 external pages.
5 checks passed
Title: 41 characters
Your title is a healthy 41 characters: “Eco: Failsafe Execution for Onchain Money”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://eco.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://eco.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,122 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (1 KiB, 0 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
4 pages without an H1
/sauce, /blog, /privacy-policy and /tos have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
/support/en/articles/10165545-eco-brand-guidelines has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
14 internal pages checked
We fetched 14 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 14 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
28 of 30 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
6 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (eco.com).
Valid certificate (75 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE2 verifies for eco.com and is valid for another 75 days.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://eco.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 35 links work
All 35 links checked from your homepage (15 internal, 20 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
DNSSEC is off
eco.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
3 checks passed
Domain is 28 years old
28 yearseco.com was registered in Sep 1998 through Cloudflare, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Certificate issuers are restricted
CAA records allow only digicert.com, letsencrypt.org, pki.goog and ssl.com to issue certificates for eco.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.
Registered until Sep 2035
eco.com is registered until Sep 2035.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 444 words of copy
The homepage carries about 444 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SCHEDULE DEMO”.
21 calls to action
The homepage has 21 calls to action, for example “SCHEDULE DEMO”, “LEARN MORE” and “SUBSCRIBE”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be eco.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.
Email authentication score: 75/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net include:mail.zendesk.com -all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
8 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- CMS
- Framer 1f371ea
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Framer
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 30 issues on eco.com, including 14 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.