Website review, no card needed

eco.com logo

eco.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202630 issues · 93 checks

This review found 30 issues worth fixing on eco.com, 5 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 11.2 MB in 66 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.4 s2.3 sMay 9Oct 242.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.2 s
May 16, 20263.1 s
May 23, 20262.9 s
May 30, 20262.7 s
Jun 6, 20262.7 s
Jun 13, 20262.6 s
Jun 20, 20262.6 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.5 s
Jul 11, 20262.4 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.5 s
Aug 1, 20262.4 s
Aug 8, 20262.4 s
Aug 15, 20262.4 s
Aug 22, 20262.4 s
Aug 29, 20262.4 s
Sep 5, 20262.4 s
Sep 12, 20262.4 s
Sep 19, 20262.5 s
Sep 26, 20262.5 s
Oct 3, 20262.6 s
Oct 10, 20262.6 s
Oct 17, 20262.5 s
Oct 24, 20262.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
366 ms98 msMay 9Oct 24140 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026335 ms
May 16, 2026303 ms
May 23, 2026257 ms
May 30, 2026248 ms
Jun 6, 2026233 ms
Jun 13, 2026228 ms
Jun 20, 2026165 ms
Jun 27, 2026151 ms
Jul 4, 2026143 ms
Jul 11, 2026137 ms
Jul 18, 2026142 ms
Jul 25, 2026151 ms
Aug 1, 2026157 ms
Aug 8, 2026165 ms
Aug 15, 2026167 ms
Aug 22, 2026163 ms
Aug 29, 2026150 ms
Sep 5, 2026140 ms
Sep 12, 2026129 ms
Sep 19, 2026134 ms
Sep 26, 2026139 ms
Oct 3, 2026153 ms
Oct 10, 2026155 ms
Oct 17, 2026144 ms
Oct 24, 2026140 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

4 to fix75
  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (framerusercontent.com, Google Tag Manager and framer.com and others), adding 11.2 MB and 537 ms of main-thread time.

  • framerusercontent.com adds 366 ms

    366 ms

    framerusercontent.com costs a phone 366 ms of main-thread work and 10.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 75

    75/100

    Your mobile performance score is 75. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    610 ms · 181 KiB

    About 181 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 610 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 246 KiB

    4 images could be 246 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 102 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    16 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (16 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    10 KiB

    About 10 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 695 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 73 ms

    73 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 73 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.6 s

    5.6 s

    Your largest element takes 5.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Program money movement across digital asset markets—with st…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 9.4 s

    9.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 9.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors wait 2.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 278 ms

    278 ms

    Real visitors wait 278 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 988 ms

    988 ms

    Real visitors wait 988 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

5 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 55% faster for real visitors

    -55%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 335 ms to 140 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 21% faster for real visitors

    -21%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 90 ms

    90 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 90 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix69
  • Page weight: 11.2 MB in 66 requests

    11.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 11.2 MB in 66 requests on a phone: media 9.9 MB (1), images 547 KiB (34) and scripts 537 KiB (20). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    zDbCmswUWhSXiVkUxMEYy2NpuE.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (105 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 3.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.19 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.19 g of CO₂e: 382.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

1 to fix96
  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

1 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 72 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9284
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“The Smartest Money Moves With Eco” and “The Smartest Money Moves With Eco”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (203 characters)

    Your meta description is 203 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 50 internal links, 110 external

    The homepage links to 50 pages on eco.com and 110 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Title: 41 characters

    Your title is a healthy 41 characters: “Eco: Failsafe Execution for Onchain Money”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://eco.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://eco.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,122 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (1 KiB, 0 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 4 pages without an H1

    /sauce, /blog, /privacy-policy and /tos have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    /support/en/articles/10165545-eco-brand-guidelines has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 14 internal pages checked

    We fetched 14 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 14 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9691
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    28 of 30 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix93
  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

6 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (eco.com).

  • Valid certificate (75 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE2 verifies for eco.com and is valid for another 75 days.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://eco.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 35 links work

    All 35 links checked from your homepage (15 internal, 20 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • DNSSEC is off

    eco.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 28 years old

    28 years

    eco.com was registered in Sep 1998 through Cloudflare, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Certificate issuers are restricted

    CAA records allow only digicert.com, letsencrypt.org, pki.goog and ssl.com to issue certificates for eco.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.

  • Registered until Sep 2035

    eco.com is registered until Sep 2035.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 444 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 444 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SCHEDULE DEMO”.

  • 21 calls to action

    The homepage has 21 calls to action, for example “SCHEDULE DEMO”, “LEARN MORE” and “SUBSCRIBE”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Email authentication

1 to fix75
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be eco.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.

  • Email authentication score: 75/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net include:mail.zendesk.com -all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 8 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

CMS
Framer 1f371ea
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
Framer

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 30 issues on eco.com, including 14 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25