Website review, no card needed

economatica.com logo

economatica.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202621 issues · 77 checks

This review found 21 issues worth fixing on economatica.com, 3 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element). Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.9 s1.3 sMay 16Oct 311.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.7 s
May 23, 20262.2 s
May 30, 20261.9 s
Jun 6, 20261.6 s
Jun 13, 20261.5 s
Jun 20, 20261.6 s
Jun 27, 20261.5 s
Jul 4, 20261.6 s
Jul 11, 20261.6 s
Jul 18, 20261.5 s
Jul 25, 20261.9 s
Aug 1, 20261.9 s
Aug 8, 20261.9 s
Aug 15, 20261.8 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.7 s
Sep 12, 20261.9 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20261.7 s
Oct 24, 20261.8 s
Oct 31, 20261.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
170 ms102 msMay 16Oct 31162 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026110 ms
May 23, 2026119 ms
May 30, 2026123 ms
Jun 6, 2026130 ms
Jun 13, 2026144 ms
Jun 20, 2026133 ms
Jun 27, 2026138 ms
Jul 4, 2026136 ms
Jul 11, 2026134 ms
Jul 18, 2026136 ms
Jul 25, 2026127 ms
Aug 1, 2026134 ms
Aug 8, 2026131 ms
Aug 15, 2026128 ms
Aug 22, 2026147 ms
Aug 29, 2026147 ms
Sep 5, 2026151 ms
Sep 12, 2026159 ms
Sep 19, 2026156 ms
Sep 26, 2026154 ms
Oct 3, 2026159 ms
Oct 10, 2026160 ms
Oct 17, 2026158 ms
Oct 24, 2026159 ms
Oct 31, 2026162 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of economatica.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. economatica.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. economatica.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  3. economatica.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  4. economatica.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  5. economatica.com at 3.1 s3.1 s
  6. economatica.com at 3.8 s3.8 s
  7. economatica.com at 4.4 s4.4 s
  8. economatica.com at 5.0 s5.0 s

Speed

9 to fix75
  • Mobile performance score: 75

    75/100

    Your mobile performance score is 75. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    700 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 700 ms.

  • Document request latency

    650 ms

    The HTML itself could arrive about 650 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Reduce initial server response time

    650 ms

    Reduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 650 ms on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    286 KiB

    About 286 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 271 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    268 KiB

    8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (268 KiB).

  • Main-thread work: 2.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 894 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Server response: 750 ms

    750 ms

    Your server takes 750 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (posthog.com, Facebook and Clarity and others), adding 478 KiB and 374 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    23 KiB

    About 23 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    22 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 22 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    15 KiB

    15 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify JavaScript

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 9.0 s

    9.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 9.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 40% slower for real visitors

    +40%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 110 ms to 162 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.232

    0.232

    The layout shifts by 0.232 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 448 ms

    448 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 448 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

9 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 158 ms

    158 ms

    Real visitors wait 158 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 415 ms

    415 ms

    Real visitors wait 415 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 27% faster for real visitors

    -27%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Speed Index: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.3 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Your largest element renders in 1.9 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Inteligência financeira em todos os formatos que o seu time…”.

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.27 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.27 g of CO₂e: 32.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Page weight: 964 KiB in 48 requests

    964 KiB

    Your homepage downloads 964 KiB in 48 requests on a phone: scripts 792 KiB (16), fonts 71 KiB (2) and HTML 48 KiB (1). That is a lean page.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9895
  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (36 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 36 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 7 form fields without a label

    7 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 18 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

Google 100100
  • 94 internal links, 20 external

    The homepage links to 94 pages on economatica.com and 20 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 144 characters

    Your meta description is 144 characters: “Dados financeiros com 40 anos de histórico, prontos para análises, decisões e agentes de IA. Plataforma, Terminal, Exce…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Inteligência financeira em todos os formatos que o seu time precisa.”.

  • Title: 59 characters

    Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “Economatica: Dados Financeiros para Humanos e Agentes de IA”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.economatica.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: ItemList, Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.economatica.com/sitemap-index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,858 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.economatica.com/llms.txt (1 KiB, 9 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 27 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 96100
  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    6 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 5 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,474 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,474 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Solicitar demo” and “Demo da Plataforma→”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (4 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and PostHog.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 18 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 18 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at economatica.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Astro
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | PostHog
Hosting
Vercel

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 21 issues on economatica.com, including 15 speed issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25