Website review, no card needed

eirmc.com logo

eirmc.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202627 issues · 78 checks

This review found 27 issues worth fixing on eirmc.com, 12 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.8 s2.4 sMay 16Oct 312.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.7 s
May 23, 20262.7 s
May 30, 20262.6 s
Jun 6, 20262.7 s
Jun 13, 20262.8 s
Jun 20, 20262.8 s
Jun 27, 20262.8 s
Jul 4, 20262.6 s
Jul 11, 20262.7 s
Jul 18, 20262.6 s
Jul 25, 20262.5 s
Aug 1, 20262.6 s
Aug 8, 20262.5 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.5 s
Sep 5, 20262.5 s
Sep 12, 20262.5 s
Sep 19, 20262.5 s
Sep 26, 20262.5 s
Oct 3, 20262.5 s
Oct 10, 20262.4 s
Oct 17, 20262.5 s
Oct 24, 20262.6 s
Oct 31, 20262.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
97 ms86 msMay 16Oct 3195 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 202691 ms
May 23, 202691 ms
May 30, 202688 ms
Jun 6, 202691 ms
Jun 13, 202688 ms
Jun 20, 202687 ms
Jun 27, 202688 ms
Jul 4, 202687 ms
Jul 11, 202691 ms
Jul 18, 202695 ms
Jul 25, 202692 ms
Aug 1, 202695 ms
Aug 8, 202689 ms
Aug 15, 202688 ms
Aug 22, 202688 ms
Aug 29, 202689 ms
Sep 5, 202691 ms
Sep 12, 202693 ms
Sep 19, 202696 ms
Sep 26, 202695 ms
Oct 3, 202696 ms
Oct 10, 202695 ms
Oct 17, 202692 ms
Oct 24, 202693 ms
Oct 31, 202695 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of eirmc.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. eirmc.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. eirmc.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. eirmc.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  4. eirmc.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  5. eirmc.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  6. eirmc.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  7. eirmc.com at 3.3 s3.3 s
  8. eirmc.com at 3.7 s3.7 s

Speed

7 to fix33
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.5 s · 486 KiB

    About 486 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.0 s

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.0 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 33

    33/100

    Your mobile performance score is 33. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    750 ms · 186 KiB

    7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (186 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    750 ms · 147 KiB

    About 147 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 64 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 64 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 2.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (ehc.com, invocacdn.com and securiti.ai and others), adding 738 KiB and 303 ms of main-thread time.

  • 15 long tasks on the main thread

    15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 232 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    170 KiB

    5 images could be 170 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Font display

    150 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 13 ms

    13 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 13 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 9.0 s

    9.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 9.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 26.0 s

    26.0 s

    Your largest element takes 26.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Mother measuring son's height on wall in kitchen.”.

  • Time to Interactive: 26.9 s

    26.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 26.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.7 s

    9.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 687 ms

    687 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 687 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.13

    0.13

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.13 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.146

    0.146

    The layout shifts by 0.146 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 91 ms to 95 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 111 ms

    111 ms

    Real visitors wait 111 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 428 ms

    428 ms

    Real visitors wait 428 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 4.7 MB in 54 requests

    4.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.7 MB in 54 requests on a phone: scripts 2.4 MB (19), fonts 1.6 MB (5) and other files 351 KiB (17). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.35 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.35 g of CO₂e: 161.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

1 to fixGoogle 9999
  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 18 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 1 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 10076
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is long (66 characters)

    Your title is 66 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Full-Service Hospital & ER | Eastern Idaho Regional Medical Center”.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: missing name”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 95 internal links, 25 external

    The homepage links to 95 pages on eirmc.com and 25 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 148 characters

    Your meta description is 148 characters: “Located in Idaho Falls, our hospital proudly offers comprehensive medical services across a three-state area, including…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.eirmc.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.eirmc.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing name, url, sameAs (social profiles) and description. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,178 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 73 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Minified React error #418; visit https://reactjs.org/docs/error-decoder.html?invariant=418 for the full message or use …”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    20 of 22 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix75
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 816 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 816 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “schedule Average ER Wait Times”.

  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Register Online” and “Call us: (208) 529-6111”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at eirmc.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Hosting
Vercel

Company

Headquarters
Idaho Falls

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 27 issues on eirmc.com, including 16 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25